Literature DB >> 30102068

Giving and Receiving Effective Feedback: A Review Article and How-To Guide.

Rachel Jug1, Xiaoyin Sara Jiang1, Sarah M Bean1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Feedback is the delivery of information based on direct observation that is meant to improve performance. Learning is at the heart of feedback, and as such, feedback is a required competency in pathology resident education. In the laboratory setting, the ability of laboratory professionals in all practice settings and experience levels to give and receive feedback is crucial to workflow and ultimately patient care. OBJECTIVE.—: To summarize the importance of feedback, strategies for optimizing feedback exchange, and overcoming barriers to giving and receiving feedback. DATA SOURCES.—: Peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, medical education literature, and published books on feedback and communication were reviewed to explore ideal methods of giving and receiving feedback and to identify common barriers to feedback exchange. CONCLUSIONS.—: Medical education literature emphasizes techniques for giving feedback and describes barriers often encountered to feedback exchange in medical practice. Effective feedback requires that the giver, receiver, and environment be carefully considered. Likewise, each of these factors can impose barriers to feedback exchange. Various methods for giving feedback have been described. All feedback should address a specific behavior, be nonevaluative in nature, and be followed by confirmation of understanding and an action plan. Few articles describe the importance of receiving feedback. Receiving feedback can be difficult, but it is enhanced by learning to listen and making conscious decisions regarding implementing the messages heard. Giving and receiving feedback become easier with practice.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30102068     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0058-RA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  8 in total

1.  Online peer editing: effects of comments and edits on academic writing skills.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Galina Shulgina; Mik Fanguy; Jamie Costley
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Training and standardization of simulated patients for multicentre studies in clinical pharmacy education.

Authors:  Karina A Resende; Afonso M Cavaco; Márcia D Luna-Leite; Bianca R Acacio; Núbia N Pinto; Maria D Neta; Angelita C Melo
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2020-10-30

3.  Rapid Feedback: Assessing Pre-clinical Teaching in the Era of Online Learning.

Authors:  Daniel Walden; Meagan Rawls; Sally A Santen; Moshe Feldman; Anna Vinnikova; Alan Dow
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Overcoming barriers to effective feedback: a solution-focused faculty development approach.

Authors:  Samar McCutcheon; Anne-Marie Duchemin
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-23

Review 5.  The Use of Feedback in Improving the Knowledge, Attitudes and Skills of Medical Students: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Margareth Alves Bastos E Castro; Regina Lúcia Muniz de Almeida; Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti; Sandra Helena Cerrato Tibiriçá; Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel; Giancarlo Lucchetti
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-10-18

6.  Introduction of structured feedback for MBBS students: Perception of students and faculty.

Authors:  Himashree Bhattacharyya; Jayant Vagha; Gajendra Kumar Medhi; Star Pala; Happy Chutia; Parash Jyoti Bora; Vizovonuo Visi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2020-10-30

7.  Does the format residents use to give and receive feedback about teaching affect the usefulness of the feedback?

Authors:  Udoka Okpalauwaekwe; Sean Polreis; Marcel D'Eon
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 8.  Emotions in simulation-based education: friends or foes of learning?

Authors:  Vicki R LeBlanc; Glenn D Posner
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.