Literature DB >> 30098015

A Multicomponent Model to Improve Hospital Care of Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Liron Sinvani1,2, Jessy Warner-Cohen2,3, Andrew Strunk1, Travis Halbert1, Ruchika Harisingani1,2, Colm Mulvany1, Michael Qiu1, Andrzej Kozikowski2,4, Vidhi Patel4, Tara Liberman2,4, Maria Carney2,4, Renee Pekmezaris2,5, Gisele Wolf-Klein2,4, Corey Karlin-Zysman1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a multicomponent intervention improves care in hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment.
DESIGN: One-year retrospective chart review with propensity score matching on critical demographic and clinical variables was used to compare individauls with cognitive impairmenet on intervention and nonintervention units.
SETTING: Large tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All hospitalized individuals age 65 and older with cognitive impairment admitted to medicine who required constant or enhanced observation for behavioral and psychological symptoms. INTERVENTION: Multicomponent intervention (geographic unit cohorting, multidisciplinary approach, patient engagement specialists (PES), staff education) or usual care. MEASUREMENTS: In-hospital mortality, length of stay, readmission, management of behavioral disturbances.
RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 476 of the 712 intervention visits were pair-matched with 476 of the 558 usual care visits. Matching was successful in balancing baseline covariates between intervention and usual care units. Individuals admitted to the intervention unit had lower in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs 2.9%, p=0.05) and shorter stays (5.0 vs 5.8 days, p=0.04). There was no difference in discharge home (p=0.90) or 30-day readmission rates (p=0.44). Individuals on the intervention unit were less likely than those receivng usual care to have an order for constant (12.0% vs 45.8%, p<0.01) or enhanced (22.1% vs 79.6%, p<0.01) observation, to be taking benzodiazepines (26.3% vs 38.0%, p<0.01), to be taking nothing by mouth (29.6% vs 40.8%, p=0.01), to be on bedrest (17.0% vs 25.8%, p=0.01), to be taking antipsychotics (41.2% vs 54.0%, p<0.01), or to have restraints (3.2% vs 6.9%, p=.01).
CONCLUSION: A multicomponent intervention of geographic cohorting, multidisciplinary approach, PES, and staff education may offer a new paradigm in the management of hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment.
© 2018, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2018, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive impairment; constant observation; dementia; patient engagement specialists; sitter

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30098015     DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  5 in total

1.  Identifying Caregiver Availability Using Medical Notes With Rule-Based Natural Language Processing: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Elham Mahmoudi; Wenbo Wu; Cyrus Najarian; James Aikens; Julie Bynum; V G Vinod Vydiswaran
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2022-09-22

2.  Explaining Caregivers' Perceptions of Palliative Care Unmet Needs in Iranian Alzheimer's Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Hadis Ashrafizadeh; Mahin Gheibizadeh; Maryam Rassouli; Fatemeh Hajibabaee; Shahnaz Rostami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-01

3.  Increased Emergency Department Hallway Length of Stay is Associated with Development of Delirium.

Authors:  Kate van Loveren; Arnav Singla; Liron Sinvani; Christopher Calandrella; Thomas Perera; Martina Brave; Lance Becker; Timmy Li
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-09

4.  Quality of life of patients with dementia in acute hospitals in Germany: a non-randomised, case-control study comparing a regular ward with a special care ward with dementia care concept.

Authors:  Daniel Lüdecke; Georg Poppele; Jens Klein; Christopher Kofahl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  What are the needs of people with dementia in acute hospital settings, and what interventions are made to meet these needs? A systematic integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Janne Røsvik; Anne Marie Mork Rokstad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.