Literature DB >> 30097445

Microbial Source Tracking Using Quantitative and Digital PCR To Identify Sources of Fecal Contamination in Stormwater, River Water, and Beach Water in a Great Lakes Area of Concern.

Zachery R Staley1, Rachel J Boyd2, Phoenix Shum2, Thomas A Edge2.   

Abstract

Areas of concern (AOCs) around the Great Lakes are characterized by historic and ongoing problems with microbial water quality, leading to beneficial use impairments (BUIs) such as beach postings and closures. In this study, we assessed river and beach sites within the Rouge River watershed, associated stormwater outfalls, and at Rouge Beach. The concentrations of Escherichia coli as well as human- and gull-specific qPCR microbial source tracking (MST) markers were assessed at all sites. A preliminary comparison of digital PCR (dPCR) methodologies for both MST markers was conducted regarding sensitivity and specificity. Within the watershed, the outfalls were found to be a prominent source of human fecal contamination, with two outfalls particularly affected by sewage cross-connections. However, the occurrence of human fecal contamination along Rouge Beach and in the lower portions of the watershed was largely dependent on rain events. Gull fecal contamination was the predominant source of contamination at the beach, particularly during dry weather. The multiplex human/gull dPCR methodology used in this study tended to be more sensitive than the individual quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays, with only a slight decrease in specificity. Both dPCR and qPCR methodologies identified the same predominance of human and gull markers in stormwater and beach locations, respectively; however, the dPCR multiplex assay was more sensitive and capable of detecting fecal contamination that was undetected by qPCR assays. These results demonstrate the dPCR assay used in this study could be a viable tool for MST studies to increase the ability to identify low levels of fecal contamination.IMPORTANCE Fecal contamination of recreational water poses a persistent and ongoing problem, particularly in areas of concern around the Great Lakes. The identification of the source(s) of fecal contamination is essential for safeguarding public health as well as guiding remediation efforts; however, fecal contamination may frequently be present at low levels and remain undetectable by certain methodologies. In this study, we utilized microbial source tracking techniques using both quantitative and digital PCR assays to identify sources of contamination. Our results indicated high levels of human fecal contamination within stormwater outfalls, while lower levels were observed throughout the watershed. Additionally, high levels of gull fecal contamination were detected at Rouge Beach, particularly during drier sampling events. Furthermore, our results indicated an increased sensitivity of the digital PCR assay to detect both human and gull contamination, suggesting it could be a viable tool for future microbial source tracking studies. © Crown copyright 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; area of concern; dPCR; qPCR; source tracking; stormwater; water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30097445      PMCID: PMC6182909          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01634-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  26 in total

1.  Specificity of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron marker for human feces.

Authors:  C Andrew Carson; Jessica M Christiansen; Helen Yampara-Iquise; Verel W Benson; Claire Baffaut; Jerri V Davis; Robert R Broz; William B Kurtz; Wendi M Rogers; William H Fales
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Performance, design, and analysis in microbial source tracking studies.

Authors:  Donald M Stoeckel; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Microbial source tracking: a forensic technique for microbial source identification?

Authors:  Carl M Stapleton; Mark D Wyer; David Kay; John Crowther; Adrian T McDonald; Martin Walters; Andrew Gawler; Terry Hindle
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2007-04-23

4.  Application of microbial source tracking methods in a Gulf of Mexico field setting.

Authors:  A Korajkic; B D Badgley; M J Brownell; V J Harwood
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Effect of platform, reference material, and quantification model on enumeration of Enterococcus by quantitative PCR methods.

Authors:  Yiping Cao; Mano Sivaganesan; Julie Kinzelman; A Denene Blackwood; Rachel T Noble; Richard A Haugland; John F Griffith; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Comparative microbial source tracking methods for identification of fecal contamination sources at Sunnyside Beach in the Toronto region area of concern.

Authors:  Zachery R Staley; Thomas A Edge
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.744

7.  Comparison of gull feces-specific assays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of Catellicoccus marimammalium and Streptococcus spp.

Authors:  Hodon Ryu; John F Griffith; Izhar U H Khan; Stephen Hill; Thomas A Edge; Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; Joel Gonzalez-Nieves; Jorge Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Characterizing a model human gut microbiota composed of members of its two dominant bacterial phyla.

Authors:  Michael A Mahowald; Federico E Rey; Henning Seedorf; Peter J Turnbaugh; Robert S Fulton; Aye Wollam; Neha Shah; Chunyan Wang; Vincent Magrini; Richard K Wilson; Brandi L Cantarel; Pedro M Coutinho; Bernard Henrissat; Lara W Crock; Alison Russell; Nathan C Verberkmoes; Robert L Hettich; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  High sensitivity of children to swimming-associated gastrointestinal illness: results using a rapid assay of recreational water quality.

Authors:  Timothy J Wade; Rebecca L Calderon; Kristen P Brenner; Elizabeth Sams; Michael Beach; Richard Haugland; Larry Wymer; Alfred P Dufour
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Design and evaluation of Bacteroides DNA probes for the specific detection of human fecal pollution.

Authors:  C A Kreader
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  6 in total

1.  Contaminant Discharge From Outfalls and Subsequent Aquatic Ecological Risks in the River Systems in Dhaka City: Extent of Waste Load Contribution in Pollution.

Authors:  Nehreen Majed; Md Al Sadikul Islam
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Microbial Source Tracking as a Method of Determination of Beach Sand Contamination.

Authors:  Elisabete Valério; Maria Leonor Santos; Pedro Teixeira; Ricardo Matias; João Mendonça; Warish Ahmed; João Brandão
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Molecular Diagnostic Tools Applied for Assessing Microbial Water Quality.

Authors:  Lisa Paruch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Human Fecal Contamination Corresponds to Changes in the Freshwater Bacterial Communities of a Large River Basin.

Authors:  Jill S McClary-Gutierrez; Zac Driscoll; Cheryl Nenn; Ryan J Newton
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-09-08

5.  Genetic sequence data evidence that human faecal-associated HF183 sequences are on human skin and in urine.

Authors:  Dong Li; Laurie C Van De Werfhorst; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.059

6.  Assessment of seawater bacterial infection in rabbit tibia by Illumina MiSeq sequencing and bacterial culture.

Authors:  Du Wang; Qingcong Zheng; Qi Lv; Chaofan Zhang; Yun Zheng; Huidong Chen; Wenming Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.