Heike Schütze1, Allan Shell2, Henry Brodaty2. 1. School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia. hschutze@uow.edu.au. 2. Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, UNSW Australia, Level 3, AGSM Building, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dementia is the second leading cause of death in Australia. Over half of patients with dementia are undiagnosed in primary care. This paper describes the development, implementation and initial evaluation of the first national continuing medical education program on the timely diagnosis and management of dementia in general practice in Australia. METHODS: Continuing medical education workshops were developed and run in 16 urban and rural locations across Australia (12 were delivered as small group workshops, four as large groups), and via online modules. Two train-the-trainer workshops were held. The target audience was general practitioners, however, international medical graduates, GP registrars, other doctors, primary care nurses and other health professionals were also welcome. Self-complete questionnaires were used for the evaluation. RESULTS: Of 1236 people (GPs, other doctors, nurses and other health professionals) who participated in the program, 609 completed the full program (small group workshops (282), large group workshops (75), online modules (252)); and 627 elected to undertake one or more individual submodules (large group workshops (444), online program (183)). Of those who completed the full program as a small group workshop, 14 undertook the additional Train-the-trainer program. 76% of participants felt that their learning needs were entirely met and 78% felt the program was entirely relevant to their practice. CONCLUSION: Continuing medical education programs are an effective method to deliver education to GPs. A combination of face-to-face and online delivery modes increases reach to primary care providers. Train-the-trainer sessions and online continuing medical education programs promote long-term delivery sustainability. Further research is required to determine the long-term knowledge translation effects of the program.
BACKGROUND:Dementia is the second leading cause of death in Australia. Over half of patients with dementia are undiagnosed in primary care. This paper describes the development, implementation and initial evaluation of the first national continuing medical education program on the timely diagnosis and management of dementia in general practice in Australia. METHODS: Continuing medical education workshops were developed and run in 16 urban and rural locations across Australia (12 were delivered as small group workshops, four as large groups), and via online modules. Two train-the-trainer workshops were held. The target audience was general practitioners, however, international medical graduates, GP registrars, other doctors, primary care nurses and other health professionals were also welcome. Self-complete questionnaires were used for the evaluation. RESULTS: Of 1236 people (GPs, other doctors, nurses and other health professionals) who participated in the program, 609 completed the full program (small group workshops (282), large group workshops (75), online modules (252)); and 627 elected to undertake one or more individual submodules (large group workshops (444), online program (183)). Of those who completed the full program as a small group workshop, 14 undertook the additional Train-the-trainer program. 76% of participants felt that their learning needs were entirely met and 78% felt the program was entirely relevant to their practice. CONCLUSION: Continuing medical education programs are an effective method to deliver education to GPs. A combination of face-to-face and online delivery modes increases reach to primary care providers. Train-the-trainer sessions and online continuing medical education programs promote long-term delivery sustainability. Further research is required to determine the long-term knowledge translation effects of the program.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alzheimer’s disease; Continuing medical education; Dementia; General practice; Primary care
Authors: Murna Downs; Stephen Turner; Michelle Bryans; Jane Wilcock; John Keady; Enid Levin; Ronan O'Carroll; Kate Howie; Steve Iliffe Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-03-25
Authors: Linda Lang; Angela Clifford; Li Wei; Dongmei Zhang; Daryl Leung; Glenda Augustine; Isaac M Danat; Weiju Zhou; John R Copeland; Kaarin J Anstey; Ruoling Chen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Christopher Beer; Barbara Horner; Osvaldo P Almeida; Samuel Scherer; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Nick Bretland; Penelope Flett; Frank Schaper; Leon Flicker Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Christine R Lathren; Philip D Sloane; Joseph D Hoyle; Sheryl Zimmerman; Daniel I Kaufer Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Michael Woodward; Henry Brodaty; Maree McCabe; Colin L Masters; Sharon L Naismith; Philip Morris; Christopher C Rowe; Peter Walker; Mark Yates Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2022 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Laura Parra-Anguita; Francisco P García-Fernández; Rafael Del-Pino-Casado; Pedro L Pancorbo-Hidalgo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 3.390