| Literature DB >> 30096852 |
Ana Carolina Remondi Souza1,2, Beth Burgwyn Fuchs3, Viviane de Souza Alves4, Elamparithi Jayamani5, Arnaldo Lopes Colombo6, Eleftherios Mylonakis7.
Abstract
Caenorhabditiselegans is a valuable tool as an infection model toward the study of Candida species. In this work, we endeavored to develop a C. elegans-Candidaparapsilosis infection model by using the fungi as a food source. Three species of the C. parapsilosis complex (C.parapsilosis (sensustricto), Candidaorthopsilosis and Candidametapsilosis) caused infection resulting in C. elegans killing. All three strains that comprised the complex significantly diminished the nematode lifespan, indicating the virulence of the pathogens against the host. The infection process included invasion of the intestine and vulva which resulted in organ protrusion and hyphae formation. Importantly, hyphae formation at the vulva opening was not previously reported in C. elegans-Candida infections. Fungal infected worms in the liquid assay were susceptible to fluconazole and caspofungin and could be found to mount an immune response mediated through increased expression of cnc-4, cnc-7, and fipr-22/23. Overall, the C. elegans-C. parapsilosis infection model can be used to model C. parapsilosis host-pathogen interactions.Entities:
Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans; Candida parapsilosis; host-pathogen interaction; hyphae; invertebrate infection model
Year: 2018 PMID: 30096852 PMCID: PMC6116074 DOI: 10.3390/genes9080401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Candida parapslosis complex and Caenorhabditis elegans strains used in this study.
| Strain | Description | Purpose | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| WT a | All experiments | ATCC | |
| WT | All experiments | ATCC | |
| WT | All experiments | ATCC | |
|
| |||
|
| WT | Immunity response | [ |
| Killing assay, treatment with antifungal drugs, microscopic studies | [ | ||
|
|
| Immunity response | [ |
a Wild-type.
In vitro activity against C. parapsilosis species complex reference strains.
| MIC (µg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Strain | Fluconazole | Caspofungin |
| ATCC 22019 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| ATCC 96141 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| ATCC 96143 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.
Oligonucleotide sequences used in this study.
| Oligonucleotide a | Sequence 5′ to 3′ | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| ABF-1/Fw | CTGCCTTCTCCTTGTTCTCCTACT | [ |
| ABF-1/Rv | CCTCTGCATTACCGGAACATC | [ |
| ABF-2/Fw | TTTCCTTGCACTTCTCCTGG | This study b |
| ABF-2/Rv | CGGTTCCACAGTTTTGCATAC | This study |
| CNC-4/Fw | ACAATGGGGCTACGGTCCATAT | This study |
| CNC-4/Rv | ACTTTCCAATGAGCATTCCGAGGA | This study |
| CNC-7/Fw | CAGGTTCAATGCAGTATGGCTATGG | This study |
| CNC-7/Rv | GGACGGTACATTCCCATACC | This study |
| FIPR-22/23 Fw | GCTGAAGCTCCACACATCC | [ |
| FIPR-22/23 Rv | TATCCCATTCCTCCGTATCC | [ |
a The letters Fw and Rv in the primers names describe the orientation of the primers 5′ to 3′: F for forward (sense) and R for reverse (antisense); b the efficiency of primers was evaluated based on the slope of the standard curve constructed by a 10 fold-dilution series using the cDNA.
Figure 1C. elegans physiological effects after C. parapsilosis exposure. (A) Escherichia coli exposure shows no adverse effects. The vulva region is highlighted in red; (B) C. parapsilosis (sensu stricto); (C) C. orthopsilosis; (D) C. metapsilosis. Scale Bar-20 µm.
Figure 2Efficacy of fluconazole (FLU) and caspofungin (CAS) during C. elegans infection with C. parapsilosis (sensu stricto), C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis reference strains. (A) C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, FLU treatment. p < 0.05 to FLU_1×MIC. (B) C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, CAS treatment. p = 0.0004 to CAS_1×MIC. (C) C. orthopsilosis ATCC 96141, FLU treatment. p < 0.007 to FLU_1×MIC. (D) C. orthopsilosis ATCC 96141, CAS treatment. p = 0.0001 to CAS_1×MIC. (E) C. metapsilosis ATCC 96143, FLU treatment. p < 0.05 to FLU_1×MIC. (D) C. metapsilosis ATCC 96143, CAS treatment. p < 0.0001 to CAS_1×MIC.
Figure 3Relative expression of antimicrobial peptides after infection with C. parapsilosis (sensu stricto) (ATCC 22019), C. orthopsilosis (ATCC 96141), C. metapsilosis (ATCC 96143), and in non-infected worms (NI). Data are presented as the average of three biological replicates each normalized to a control gene. The error bars represent the standard errors of the mean for three independent biological replicates. * p < 0.005.
Figure 4Infection assay with C. elegans wild-type (N2) and pmk-1 animals shows that pmk-1 was more susceptible to (A) C. parapsilosis (sensu stricto) (ATCC 22019), (B) C. orthopsilosis (ATCC 96141) and (C) C. metapsilosis (ATCC 96143) infection (p < 0.05).