| Literature DB >> 30096753 |
Shalv Amit Parekh1, Rebecca Nicole David2, Kranthi K R Bannuru3, Lakshminarasimhan Krishnaswamy4, Avinash Baji5,6.
Abstract
The scarcity of drinking water and the contamination of water sources in underdeveloped countries are serious problems that require immediate low-tech and low-cost solutions. In this study, we fabricated polyacrylonitrile (PAN) porous membranes coated with silver nanoparticles (AgNP) and demonstrated their use for water filtration and water treatment applications. The membranes were prepared by electrospinning a PAN solution and treating in a hydroxylamine (NH₂OH) aqueous solution to form ⁻C(NH₂)N⁻OH groups that were used for functionalization (Ag⁺ ions) of the membrane. The coordinated silver ions were then converted to silver nanoparticles. The microstructure of the membrane, water permeability, antimicrobial effect (using Escherichia coli), and particulate filtration capabilities were studied. This study verified that the membrane demonstrated a 100% reduction for Gram-negative bacteria with an effective filtration rate of 8.0 mL/cm² min. Furthermore, the membrane was able to eliminate 60% of latex beads as small as 50 nm and over 80% of the 2 µm beads via gravity filtration. This study demonstrated that PAN⁻AgNP membranes can be employed as antimicrobial membranes for the filtration of water in underdeveloped countries.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial; electrospinning; polyacrylonitrile; silver nanoparticles; water filtration
Year: 2018 PMID: 30096753 PMCID: PMC6161080 DOI: 10.3390/membranes8030059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Schematic of electrospinning setup used to prepare the membranes. PAN: polyacrylonitrile.
Figure 2Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of electrospun PAN fibres: (a) PAN at ×200 magnification (Scale Bar = 100 µm); (b) PAN at ×1000 magnification (Scale Bar = 10 µm); (c) PAN at ×10,000 magnification (Scale Bar = 1 µm); (d) PAN–AgNP (silver nanoparticles) at ×200 magnification (Scale Bar = 100 µm); (e) PAN–AgNP at ×1000 magnification (Scale Bar = 10 µm); (f) PAN–AgNP at ×10,000 magnification (Scale Bar = 1 µm).
Figure 3Histogram size distribution of: (a) PAN; (b) PAN–AgNP.
Figure 4Comparison of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of PAN and PAN with AgNP membranes.
Figure 5XRD plots of PAN and PAN–AgNP.
Antimicrobial efficacy of AgNP on PAN membranes tested on Escherichia coli.
| Sample | Percentage Reduction | |
|---|---|---|
| 30 min | 60 min | |
| PAN (control) | No Reduction | No Reduction |
| No Reduction | No Reduction | |
| PAN–AgNP Sample 1 | 99.997678 | 99.9995 |
| PAN–AgNP Sample 2 | 99.989017 | 100.000 |
| PAN–AgNP Sample 3 | 99.999213 | 100.000 |
Figure 6Agar plates of sample from the (a) Bacterial control; (b) PAN sample control; (c) PAN–AgNP sample (after 30 min); (d) PAN–AgNP sample (after 60 min).
Particulate filtration efficacy of PAN membranes with latex beads.
| Sample | Moles of Latex Beads (×105) | |
|---|---|---|
| Before Filtration | After Filtration | |
| PAN with 2 µm | 222.24 | 41.76 |
| PAN with 50 nm | 164.64 | 66.24 |
Figure 7Filter membrane sample after filtration of solution with latex beads: (a) PAN with 2 µm latex beads at ×270 magnification; (b) PAN with 2 µm latex beads at ×800 magnification; (c) PAN with 50 nm latex beads at ×800 magnification; (d) PAN with 50 nm latex beads at ×27,000 magnification.