Literature DB >> 30096562

A systems mechanobiology model to predict cardiac reprogramming outcomes on different biomaterials.

Yen P Kong1, Ana Y Rioja1, Xufeng Xue2, Yubing Sun3, Jianping Fu4, Andrew J Putnam5.   

Abstract

During normal development, the extracellular matrix (ECM) regulates cell fate mechanically and biochemically. However, the ECM's influence on lineage reprogramming, a process by which a cell's developmental cycle is reversed to attain a progenitor-like cell state followed by subsequent differentiation into a desired cell phenotype, is unknown. Using a material mimetic of the ECM, here we show that ligand identity, ligand density, and substrate modulus modulate indirect cardiac reprogramming efficiency, but were not individually correlated with phenotypic outcomes in a predictive manner. Alternatively, we developed a data-driven model using partial least squares regression to relate short-term cell states, defined by quantitative mechanosensitive responses to different material environments, with long-term changes in phenotype. This model was validated by accurately predicting the reprogramming outcomes on a different material platform. Collectively, these findings suggest a means to rapidly screen candidate biomaterials that support reprogramming with high efficiency, without subjecting cells to the entire reprogramming process.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart regeneration; Mechanotransduction; Reprogramming; Systems biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30096562      PMCID: PMC6119647          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  44 in total

1.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment.

Authors:  Rowena McBeath; Dana M Pirone; Celeste M Nelson; Kiran Bhadriraju; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Materials as stem cell regulators.

Authors:  William L Murphy; Todd C McDevitt; Adam J Engler
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Takahashi; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Cue-signal-response analysis of TNF-induced apoptosis by partial least squares regression of dynamic multivariate data.

Authors:  Kevin A Janes; Jason R Kelly; Suzanne Gaudet; John G Albeck; Peter K Sorger; Douglas A Lauffenburger
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Nathaniel Huebsch; Praveen R Arany; Angelo S Mao; Dmitry Shvartsman; Omar A Ali; Sidi A Bencherif; José Rivera-Feliciano; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Regulation of the Hippo-YAP pathway by G-protein-coupled receptor signaling.

Authors:  Fa-Xing Yu; Bin Zhao; Nattapon Panupinthu; Jenna L Jewell; Ian Lian; Lloyd H Wang; Jiagang Zhao; Haixin Yuan; Karen Tumaneng; Hairi Li; Xiang-Dong Fu; Gordon B Mills; Kun-Liang Guan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors.

Authors:  Thomas Vierbuchen; Austin Ostermeier; Zhiping P Pang; Yuko Kokubu; Thomas C Südhof; Marius Wernig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to beta-cells.

Authors:  Qiao Zhou; Juliana Brown; Andrew Kanarek; Jayaraj Rajagopal; Douglas A Melton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Matrix identity and tractional forces influence indirect cardiac reprogramming.

Authors:  Yen P Kong; Bita Carrion; Rahul K Singh; Andrew J Putnam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  N-cadherin adhesive interactions modulate matrix mechanosensing and fate commitment of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Brian D Cosgrove; Keeley L Mui; Tristan P Driscoll; Steven R Caliari; Kush D Mehta; Richard K Assoian; Jason A Burdick; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biomaterial-induced conversion of quiescent cardiomyocytes into pacemaker cells in rats.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Hu; An-Sheng Lee; Shih-Lin Chang; Shien-Fong Lin; Ching-Hui Weng; Hsin-Yu Lo; Pei-Chun Chou; Yung-Nan Tsai; Yen-Ling Sung; Chien-Chang Chen; Ruey-Bing Yang; Yuh-Charn Lin; Terry B J Kuo; Cheng-Han Wu; Jin-Dian Liu; Tze-Wen Chung; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 29.234

2.  Stromal cell identity modulates vascular morphogenesis in a microvasculature-on-a-chip platform.

Authors:  Emily A Margolis; David S Cleveland; Yen P Kong; Jeffrey A Beamish; William Y Wang; Brendon M Baker; Andrew J Putnam
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 7.517

Review 3.  Biomaterials and Advanced Biofabrication Techniques in hiPSCs Based Neuromyopathic Disease Modeling.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Xun Ma; Ho Ting Chu; Bo Feng; Rocky S Tuan; Yangzi Jiang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 4.  Extracellular matrix-based biomaterials for cardiac regeneration and repair.

Authors:  Haotong Li; Minghui Bao; Yu Nie
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 4.214

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.