Agnieszka Nowakowska-Toporowska1, Krystyna Malecka2, Zbigniew Raszewski3, Wlodzimierz Wieckiewicz4. 1. Research Assistant, Department of Prosthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland. Electronic address: agano125@gmail.com. 2. Research Associate Professor, Department of Drug Technology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland. 3. Laboratory Technician, Department of Prosthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland. 4. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The hardness of silicone resilient denture liners was reported to be more stable than that of acrylic resin resilient denture liners. However, the changes in hardness of these materials in artificial saliva are unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate changes in the hardness of addition-polymerizing silicone-resilient denture liners for long-term use after storage in artificial saliva. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four addition-polymerizing silicone resilient denture liners were tested: GC Reline Soft, Elite Soft Relining, Megabase, and Mucopren Soft. All were long-term relining materials of the soft type. Fifteen disk-shaped specimens were prepared for each of the tested materials (40 mm in base diameter, 8 mm in thickness). Their initial hardness was assessed with a Shore A durometer, after which they were stored in artificial saliva at a temperature of 37°C. Hardness was examined after 7, 30, and 90 days. Statistical analysis was performed using parametric ANOVA for dependent and independent variables and Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc tests (α=.05). RESULTS: All resilient denture liners increased in hardness during the experiment. The change was least for Elite Soft Relining, and GC Reline Soft was the hardest material. Initially, Megabase and Mucopren Soft were significantly softer than the other 2 materials, but their hardness increased rapidly after the first 7 days of specimen conditioning, achieving values close to Elite Soft Relining. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study, room temperature vulcanizing addition-polymerizing polyvinyl siloxanes of the soft type have different initial hardness, and this changes with storage time in artificial saliva at the temperature of the oral cavity.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The hardness of silicone resilient denture liners was reported to be more stable than that of acrylic resin resilient denture liners. However, the changes in hardness of these materials in artificial saliva are unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate changes in the hardness of addition-polymerizing silicone-resilient denture liners for long-term use after storage in artificial saliva. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four addition-polymerizing silicone resilient denture liners were tested: GC Reline Soft, Elite Soft Relining, Megabase, and Mucopren Soft. All were long-term relining materials of the soft type. Fifteen disk-shaped specimens were prepared for each of the tested materials (40 mm in base diameter, 8 mm in thickness). Their initial hardness was assessed with a Shore A durometer, after which they were stored in artificial saliva at a temperature of 37°C. Hardness was examined after 7, 30, and 90 days. Statistical analysis was performed using parametric ANOVA for dependent and independent variables and Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc tests (α=.05). RESULTS: All resilient denture liners increased in hardness during the experiment. The change was least for Elite Soft Relining, and GC Reline Soft was the hardest material. Initially, Megabase and Mucopren Soft were significantly softer than the other 2 materials, but their hardness increased rapidly after the first 7 days of specimen conditioning, achieving values close to Elite Soft Relining. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study, room temperature vulcanizing addition-polymerizing polyvinyl siloxanes of the soft type have different initial hardness, and this changes with storage time in artificial saliva at the temperature of the oral cavity.
Authors: Faris A Alshahrani; Fatemah AlToraibily; Maryam Alzaid; Amr A Mahrous; Maram A Al Ghamdi; Mohammed M Gad Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 4.967