Literature DB >> 30092279

Constructing atomic structural models into cryo-EM densities using molecular dynamics - Pros and cons.

Yuhang Wang1, Mrinal Shekhar1, Darren Thifault2, Christopher J Williams3, Ryan McGreevy1, Jane Richardson3, Abhishek Singharoy4, Emad Tajkhorshid5.   

Abstract

Accurate structure determination from electron density maps at 3-5 Å resolution necessitates a balance between extensive global and local sampling of atomistic models, yet with the stereochemical correctness of backbone and sidechain geometries. Molecular Dynamics Flexible Fitting (MDFF), particularly through a resolution-exchange scheme, ReMDFF, provides a robust way of achieving this balance for hybrid structure determination. Employing two high-resolution density maps, namely that of β-galactosidase at 3.2 Å and TRPV1 at 3.4 Å, we showcase the quality of ReMDFF-generated models, comparing them against ones submitted by independent research groups for the 2015-2016 Cryo-EM Model Challenge. This comparison offers a clear evaluation of ReMDFF's strengths and shortcomings, and those of data-guided real-space refinements in general. ReMDFF results scored highly on the various metric for judging the quality-of-fit and quality-of-model. However, some systematic discrepancies are also noted employing a Molprobity analysis, that are reproducible across multiple competition entries. A space of key refinement parameters is explored within ReMDFF to observe their impact within the final model. Choice of force field parameters and initial model seem to have the most significant impact on ReMDFF model-quality. To this end, very recently developed CHARMM36m force field parameters provide now more refined ReMDFF models than the ones originally submitted to the Cryo-EM challenge. Finally, a set of good-practices is prescribed for the community to benefit from the MDFF developments. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryo-EM data challenge; Force fields; Hybrid modeling; Molecular dynamics flexible fitting; Resolution-exchange; Structure determination

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30092279      PMCID: PMC6394829          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  65 in total

Review 1.  Single-particle imaging of macromolecules by cryo-electron microscopy.

Authors:  Joachim Frank
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2001-10-25

2.  UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.

Authors:  Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  iMODFIT: efficient and robust flexible fitting based on vibrational analysis in internal coordinates.

Authors:  José Ramón Lopéz-Blanco; Pablo Chacón
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.867

4.  MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation.

Authors:  Christopher J Williams; Jeffrey J Headd; Nigel W Moriarty; Michael G Prisant; Lizbeth L Videau; Lindsay N Deis; Vishal Verma; Daniel A Keedy; Bradley J Hintze; Vincent B Chen; Swati Jain; Steven M Lewis; W Bryan Arendall; Jack Snoeyink; Paul D Adams; Simon C Lovell; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Self-assembly of photosynthetic membranes.

Authors:  Jen Hsin; Danielle E Chandler; James Gumbart; Christopher B Harrison; Melih Sener; Johan Strumpfer; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.102

6.  Structural basis of highly conserved ribosome recycling in eukaryotes and archaea.

Authors:  Thomas Becker; Sibylle Franckenberg; Stephan Wickles; Christopher J Shoemaker; Andreas M Anger; Jean-Paul Armache; Heidemarie Sieber; Charlotte Ungewickell; Otto Berninghausen; Ingo Daberkow; Annette Karcher; Michael Thomm; Karl-Peter Hopfner; Rachel Green; Roland Beckmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Structures of the Sec61 complex engaged in nascent peptide translocation or membrane insertion.

Authors:  Marko Gogala; Thomas Becker; Birgitta Beatrix; Jean-Paul Armache; Clara Barrio-Garcia; Otto Berninghausen; Roland Beckmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model.

Authors:  Alexey Onufriev; Donald Bashford; David A Case
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

10.  A structural model of the active ribosome-bound membrane protein insertase YidC.

Authors:  Stephan Wickles; Abhishek Singharoy; Jessica Andreani; Stefan Seemayer; Lukas Bischoff; Otto Berninghausen; Johannes Soeding; Klaus Schulten; Eli O van der Sluis; Roland Beckmann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  4 in total

1.  Automated cryo-EM structure refinement using correlation-driven molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Maxim Igaev; Carsten Kutzner; Lars V Bock; Andrea C Vaiana; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Cryo-EM structures of a lipid-sensitive pentameric ligand-gated ion channel embedded in a phosphatidylcholine-only bilayer.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar; Yuhang Wang; Zhening Zhang; Zhiyu Zhao; Gisela D Cymes; Emad Tajkhorshid; Claudio Grosman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  CryoFold: determining protein structures and data-guided ensembles from cryo-EM density maps.

Authors:  Mrinal Shekhar; Genki Terashi; Chitrak Gupta; Daipayan Sarkar; Gaspard Debussche; Nicholas J Sisco; Jonathan Nguyen; Arup Mondal; John Vant; Petra Fromme; Wade D Van Horn; Emad Tajkhorshid; Daisuke Kihara; Ken Dill; Alberto Perez; Abhishek Singharoy
Journal:  Matter       Date:  2021-09-22

4.  Assessment of detailed conformations suggests strategies for improving cryoEM models: Helix at lower resolution, ensembles, pre-refinement fixups, and validation at multi-residue length scale.

Authors:  Jane S Richardson; Christopher J Williams; Lizbeth L Videau; Vincent B Chen; David C Richardson
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 2.867

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.