| Literature DB >> 30092071 |
Aurora Sabrià1,2, Rosa M Pintó1,2, Albert Bosch1,2, Josep Quer3,4, Damir Garcia-Cehic3,4, Josep Gregori3,4,5, Angela Dominguez6,7, Mónica Carol8, Maria-Rosa Sala-Farré8, Susana Guix1,2.
Abstract
Noroviruses are the main cause of epidemics of acute gastroenteritis at a global scale. Although chronically infected immunocompromised individuals are regarded as potential reservoirs for the emergence of new viral variants, viral quasispecies distribution and evolution patterns in acute symptomatic and asymptomatic infections has not been extensively studied. Amplicons of 450 nts from the P2 coding capsid domain were studied using next-generation sequencing (454/GS-Junior) platform. Inter-host diversity between symptomatic and asymptomatic acutely infected individuals linked to the same outbreak as well as their viral intra-host diversity over time were characterized. With an average of 2848 reads per sample and a cutoff frequency of 0.1%, minor variant haplotypes were detected in 5 out of 8 specimens. Transmitted variants could not be confirmed in all infected individuals in one outbreak. The observed initial intra-host viral diversity in asymptomatically infected subjects was higher than in symptomatic ones. Viral quasispecies evolution over time within individuals was host-specific, with an average of 2.8 nt changes per day (0.0062 changes per nucleotide per day) in a given symptomatic case. Nucleotide polymorphisms were detected in 28 out of 450 analyzed nucleotide positions, 32.14% of which were synonymous and 67.86% were non-synonymous. Most observed amino acid changes emerged at or near blockade epitopes A, B, D and E. Our results suggest that acutely infected individuals, even in the absence of symptoms, which go underreported and may enhance transmission, may contribute to norovirus genetic variability and evolution.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30092071 PMCID: PMC6084935 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Selected samples from food-handlers (FH) and health care workers (HCW) involved in outbreaks under study analyzed by NGS.
| Outbreak | Setting | Type of transmission | Date of outbreak | Duration of outbreak (days) | Number of affected individuals/Attack rate (%) | Average age of affected individuals (years) | Subject | Patient description, symptoms, age (years) | Date of specimen collection | Speci-men | Viral load (genome copies/g stool) | Reads (22587 total) | Number of Haplotypes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCC | Restaurant | Foodborne (shellfish, mussels) | 18/5/10 | 4 | 82/50.3 | 42.2 | A | FH, ill, 43 | 20/5/10 | A-1 | 8,09x109 | 2700 | 1 |
| 28/5/10 | A-9 | 1,33x109 | 1795 | 1 | |||||||||
| B | FH, not ill, 36 | 20/5/10 | B-1 | 7,11x109 | 5038 | 7 | |||||||
| UVEVV | Nursing home | Person-to-person | 10/11/10 | 12 | 21/21 | 75.1 | C | HCW, ill, 68 | 17/11/10 | C-1 | 2,07x108 | 1275 | 2 |
| D | HCW, ill, 50 | 17/11/10 | D-1 | 1,32x1011 | 4424 | 3 | |||||||
| 22/11/10 | D-6 | 3,37x1010 | 3653 | 18 | |||||||||
| E | FH, not ill, 47 | 17/11/10 | E-1 | 6,98x107 | 2249 | 1 | |||||||
| F | FH+HCW, not ill | 26/11/10 | F-1 | 1,62x106 | 1453 | 6 |
Primers used for the study.
| Primer | Sequence (5’-3’) | Sense | Position | Genome Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13uNoV5956 | Forward | 5925–5945 | P2 | |
| 13dNoV6447 | Reverse | 6396–6415 | P1 |
a GenBank accession number GU445325
b Underlined nt correspond to M13 forward and reverse primers, respectively
Fig 1Correlation between viral titer in stool (log genome copies/g) and number of reads.
Fig 2Comparison of the intra-host distribution of HuNoV haplotypes.
Each unique haplotype is represented by alternate gray shading. (A) Subjects from RCC11/10 outbreak. (B) Subjects from UVEVV51/10 outbreak. Asterisk indicate serial sample.
Amino acid differences between the haplotypes detected in RCC11/10 outbreak with reference to one of the samples within the outbreak.
GII.4 reference strains are also provided at the top of the table.
| VP1 Amino acid Position | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P2 | P1 | |||||
| Epitope A | Epitope D | Epitope E | ||||
| 294 | 313 | 330 | 394 | 413 | 427 | |
| 2009 New Orleans (GU445325) | P | P | I | T | I | P |
| 2012 Sydney (JX459908) | T | P | I | T | T | P |
| A-1 Hpl.1_100% | P | P | I | T | I | P |
| A-9 Hpl.1_100% | ||||||
| B-1 Hpl.1_98.0% | ||||||
| B-1 Hpl.2_0.8% | ||||||
| B-1 Hpl.3_0.3% | L | |||||
| B-1 Hpl.4_0.2% | ||||||
| B-1 Hpl.5_0.2% | L | |||||
| B-1 Hpl.6_0.2% | T | |||||
| B-1 Hpl.7_0.2% | I | |||||
Fig 3Phylogenetic analysis of haplotypes from RCC11/10 (A) and UVEVV51/10 (B) outbreak based on 450 bp of the P2 region.
The nucleotide dendrogram was inferred using the UPGMA method with distance calculation by number of differences method using the MEGA7 software. A bootstrap of 1000 replicates was performed, and values above 75 are shown. Bold indicates reference strains. Haplotypes names are composed of sample name, number of haplotype.
Amino acid differences between the haplotypes detected in UVEVV51/10 outbreak with reference to one of the samples within the outbreak.
GII.4 reference strains are also provided at the top of the table.
| VP1 Amino acid Position | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P2 | P1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Ep. A | Ep. E | ||||||||||||||||
| 289 | 293 | 294 | 314 | 339 | 356 | 358 | 380 | 399 | 404 | 407 | 413 | 416 | 426 | 433 | 434 | 436 | |
| 2009 New Orleans (GU445325) | D | I | P | T | R | A | F | N | E | V | S | I | V | F | F | F | S |
| 2012 Sydney (JX459908) | D | I | T | T | R | A | F | N | E | V | S | T | V | F | F | F | S |
| C-1 Hpl.1_97.1% | D | I | S | T | K | A | F | N | E | V | S | T | V | F | F | F | S |
| C-1 Hpl.2_2.9% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-1 Hpl.1_96.9% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-1 Hpl.2_2.9% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-1 Hpl.3_0.3% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.1_93.1% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.2_2.9% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.3_0.6% | L | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.4_0.6% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.5_0.4% | A | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.6_0.3% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.7_0.3% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.8_0.2% | T | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.9_0.2% | D | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.10_0.2% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.11_0.2% | L | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.12_0.2% | L | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.13_0.2% | A | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.14_0.2% | G | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.15_0.1% | |||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.16_0.1% | I | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.17_0.1% | R | ||||||||||||||||
| D-6 Hpl.18_0.1% | G | ||||||||||||||||
| E-1 Hpl.1_100% | I | ||||||||||||||||
| F-1 Hpl.1_92.6% | P | R | I | ||||||||||||||
| F-1 Hpl.2_3.4% | P | R | I | ||||||||||||||
| F-1_Hpl.3_2.6% | P | R | V | I | |||||||||||||
| F-1_Hpl.4_0.8% | P | R | I | S | |||||||||||||
| F-1_Hpl.5_0.3% | P | R | M | I | |||||||||||||
| F-1_Hpl.6_0.3% | P | R | I | P | |||||||||||||
Characterization of mutant spectrum found in fecal specimens.
| Sample | Mutations | Nucleotide Mutation Frequency | Amino Acid Mutation Frequency | SN | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ts | Tv | Nsyn | Syn | Indel | Minimum | Maximum | Minimum | Maximum | |||
| B-1 | 102/2267100 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2.65×10−6 | 4.50×10−5 | 5.29×10−5 | 6.22×10−5 | 0.02 |
| C-1 | 37/573750 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1,74×10−6 | 6,45×10−5 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 |
| D-1 | 139/1990800 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1,00×10−6 | 6,98×10−5 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 |
| D-6 | 252/1643850 | 16 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 1,03×10−5 | 1,53×10−4 | 2.01×10−5 | 1.70×10−4 | 0.05 |
| F-1 | 107/653850 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 7,65×10−6 | 1,64×10−4 | 1.84×10−5 | 2.66×10−4 | 0.05 |
a Mutations are those that vary relative to the corresponding consensus sequence. Nucleotides sequenced are the total number of nucleotides sequenced.
b The mutations are classified into: transitions (Ts), transversions (Tv), nonsynonymous (Nsyn), synonymous (Syn) and insertion/deletion (Indel or Stop).
c The minimum nucleotide mutation frequency is the number of different mutations found divided by the total number of nucleotides sequenced. The maximum nucleotide mutation frequency is the total number of mutations found divided by the total number of nucleotides sequenced. The maximum amino acid mutation frequency is the total number of nonsynonymous mutations divided by the number of amino acids encoded in the sequence analyzed. Mutation frequencies are expressed as substitutions per nucleotide or amino acid substitutions per amino acid.
d The Shannon entropy was calculated as SN = [∑i (pi × ln pi)]/lnN, where pi is the frequency of each sequence and N is the total number of sequences.
Fig 4Amino acid variations in P domain.
Amino acid changes observed in minor variants (yellow) were highlighted on the GII.4 P domain (side view), using the GII.4 2012 P2 domain structure (PDB id 4OOS; available at https://www.rcsb.org/structure/4OOS). The reference structure shows epitopes A (red), C (green), D (pink) and E (brown). The Jmol software was used to localize the amino acid residues (Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/).