| Literature DB >> 25378574 |
Josep Quer1, Josep Gregori2, Francisco Rodríguez-Frias3, Maria Buti4, Antonio Madejon5, Sofia Perez-del-Pulgar6, Damir Garcia-Cehic7, Rosario Casillas8, Maria Blasi8, Maria Homs8, David Tabernero8, Miguel Alvarez-Tejado9, Jose Manuel Muñoz9, Maria Cubero7, Andrea Caballero10, Jose Antonio del Campo11, Esteban Domingo12, Irene Belmonte10, Leonardo Nieto10, Sabela Lens6, Paloma Muñoz-de-Rueda13, Paloma Sanz-Cameno14, Silvia Sauleda15, Marta Bes15, Jordi Gomez16, Carlos Briones17, Celia Perales12, Julie Sheldon12, Lluis Castells4, Lluis Viladomiu7, Javier Salmeron13, Angela Ruiz-Extremera13, Rosa Quiles-Pérez13, Ricardo Moreno-Otero14, Rosario López-Rodríguez14, Helena Allende18, Manuel Romero-Gómez11, Jaume Guardia4, Rafael Esteban4, Javier Garcia-Samaniego5, Xavier Forns6, Juan Ignacio Esteban1.
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is classified into seven major genotypes and 67 subtypes. Recent studies have shown that in HCV genotype 1-infected patients, response rates to regimens containing direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are subtype dependent. Currently available genotyping methods have limited subtyping accuracy. We have evaluated the performance of a deep-sequencing-based HCV subtyping assay, developed for the 454/GS-Junior platform, in comparison with those of two commercial assays (Versant HCV genotype 2.0 and Abbott Real-time HCV Genotype II) and using direct NS5B sequencing as a gold standard (direct sequencing), in 114 clinical specimens previously tested by first-generation hybridization assay (82 genotype 1 and 32 with uninterpretable results). Phylogenetic analysis of deep-sequencing reads matched subtype 1 calling by population Sanger sequencing (69% 1b, 31% 1a) in 81 specimens and identified a mixed-subtype infection (1b/3a/1a) in one sample. Similarly, among the 32 previously indeterminate specimens, identical genotype and subtype results were obtained by direct and deep sequencing in all but four samples with dual infection. In contrast, both Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 and Abbott Real-time HCV Genotype II failed subtype 1 calling in 13 (16%) samples each and were unable to identify the HCV genotype and/or subtype in more than half of the non-genotype 1 samples. We concluded that deep sequencing is more efficient for HCV subtyping than currently available methods and allows qualitative identification of mixed infections and may be more helpful with respect to informing treatment strategies with new DAA-containing regimens across all HCV subtypes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25378574 PMCID: PMC4290919 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02093-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Microbiol ISSN: 0095-1137 Impact factor: 5.948