| Literature DB >> 30090299 |
Julian Messelberger1, Annette Grünwald1, Piermaria Pinter2, Max M Hansmann3, Dominik Munz1.
Abstract
Organic singlet diradicaloids promise application in non-linear optics, electronic devices and singlet fission. The stabilization of carbon allotropes/cumulenes (C1, C2, C4) by carbenes has been equally an area of high activity. Combining these fields, we showed recently that carbene scaffolds allow as well for the design of diradicaloids. Herein, we report a comprehensive computational investigation (CASSCF/NEVPT2; fractional occupation DFT) on the electronic properties of carbene-bridge-carbene type diradicaloids. We delineate how to adjust the properties of these ensembles through the choice of carbene and bridge and show that already a short C2 bridge results in remarkable diradicaloid character. The choice of the carbene separately tunes the energies of the S1 and T1 excited states, whereas the bridge adjusts the overall energy level of the excited states. Accordingly, we develop guidelines on how to tailor the electronic properties of these molecules. Of particular note, fractional occupation DFT is an excellent tool to predict singlet-triplet gaps.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30090299 PMCID: PMC6053972 DOI: 10.1039/c8sc01999a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1Closed-shell singlet (left) as well as open-shell singlet (right) resonance structures of Tschitschibabin's diradicaloid.
Fig. 2Modular synthesis of carbene derived diradicaloids and cumulenes.
Fig. 3Isolated and herein studied molecular scaffolds with singlet diradicaloid character.
Fig. 4Isolated and proposed carbene stabilized Kekulé diradicaloids studied herein. Structures 19, 23 and 24 show pyramidalized amino groups.
Fig. 5Frontier orbitals of 13 as obtained from CASSCF(12,12) calculation.
Diradical indices (y0, y1), NFOD, vertical excitation energies E(S1, T1, T2), absorption wavelengths and oscillation strength (fosc) for S0 → S1 transitions. Energies are given relative to the S0 state and were obtained from CASSCF(12,12) calculations for 1, 3, 4 and 13 and from CASSCF(8,8) for 2
| Compound |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.47 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.29 |
|
| 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
|
| 1.36 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.89 | 0.85 |
|
| 2.13 | 2.41 | 2.46 | 2.07 | 2.49 |
|
| 0.41 | 1.59 | 1.65 | 1.23 | 0.80 |
|
| 2.79 | 3.90 | 2.90 | 2.50 | 2.90 |
| Absorption S0 → S1 (S2) in [nm] | 581 (339 S2) | 514 | 503 | 599 | 498 (444 S2) |
|
| 0.0 (0.01) | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.13 | 0.0 (0.9) |
The biradical indices relate to CASSCF(14,14), whereas the energies were only calculated with CASSCF(12,12) due to prohibitive computational demand for the NEVPT2 correction.
Diradical indices (y0, y1), NFOD, vertical excitation energies E(S1, T1, T2), calculated absorption wavelengths and oscillation strength (fosc) for S0 → S1 transitions. Energies are given relative to the S0 state and were obtained from CASSCF(8,8) for 8 and CASSCF(12,12) for the other compounds
| Compound |
|
|
|
|
|
| Substituent | Nitroxide | Oxo-verdazyl | Quinone | CAAC | NHC |
|
| 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 0.13 |
|
| 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
|
| 2.14 | 2.10 | 1.34 | 0.47 | 0.69 |
|
| 2.30 | 3.09 | 2.19 | 2.74 | 2.46 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.75 | 1.70 | 1.78 |
|
| 2.2 | 2.97 | 2.90 | 3.51 | 2.79 |
| Absorption S0 → S1 (S2) in [nm] | 538 | 400 | 566 | 461 | 503 |
|
| 0.02 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
Diradical indices (y0, y1), NFOD, vertical excitation energies E(S1, T1, T2), calculated absorption wavelengths and oscillation strength (fosc) for S0 → S1 transitions. Energies are given relative to the S0 state and were obtained from CASSCF(12,12) for 13–19, 24 and CASSCF(14,14) for 20–23
| Compound |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Substituent | Diphenyl-carbene | Cyclopentylidene | Cyclic Fischer carbene | CAAC | saNHC | Pyrazolidin-ylidene | TTF | NHC | MIC | Pyrazolin-ylidene | Bent allene |
|
| 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 1 |
|
| 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
|
| 1.20 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 1.14 | 1.28 | 1.58 | 1.16 | 2.41 |
|
| 1.59 | 2.56 | 2.55 | 2.49 | 2.35 | 2.46 | 2.07 | 1.67 | 0.96 | 1.89 | 2.37 |
|
| 0.54 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0 |
|
| 2.64 | 2.90 | 2.90 | 2.90 | 2.97 | 2.83 | 2.55 | 2.19 | 0.84 | 2.31 | 2.30 |
| Absorption S0 → S1 (S2, S3) in [nm] | 680 | 483 (276, S3) | 484 (288, S3) | 498 (444, S2) | 527 | 504 (433, S2) | 598 | 742 | 1297 | 625 (422, S2) | 522 |
|
| 1.0 | 0.0 (0.1, S3) | 0.0 (0.2, S3) | 0.0 (0.9, S2) | 1.1 | 0.0 (1.1, S2) | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 (0.4, S2) | 0.01 |
Fig. 6Energy levels of S1 and twice the T1 states for 13 and 16–24. Derivatives of aliphatic carbenes are labeled with blue cycles, carbenes with aromatic character with red squares. Error bars relate to the root mean square deviation for the S1 states from the experimentally available values.
Diradical indices (y0, y1), NFOD, vertical excitation energies E(S1, T1, T2), calculated absorption wavelength and oscillation strength (fosc) for S0 → S1 transitions. Energies are given relative to the S0 state and were obtained from CASSCF(4,4) for 10 and 11, CASSCF(6,6) for 12, CASSCF(8,8) for 8, CASSCF(12,12) for 13 and CASSCF(14,14) for 14
| Compound |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bridge | C1 | C2 | C4 | C6H4 | CC–C6H4–CC | CC–C6H4–C6H4–CC |
|
| 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.29 | 0.78 |
|
| 0 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
|
| 0.06 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.85 | 1.43 |
|
| 5.38 | 2.88 | 2.82 | 2.74 | 2.49 | 1.58 |
|
| 4.27 | 1.41 | 1.68 | 1.70 | 0.80 | 0.21 |
|
| 4.54 | 5.62 | 4.4 | 3.51 | 2.90 | 2.10 |
| Absorption S0 → S1 (S2) in [nm] | 231 | 430 | 442 | 461 | 498 (444) | 784 (610) |
|
| 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 (0.9) | 0.0 (1.0) |
Fig. 7Frontier orbitals of 14 as obtained from CASSCF(14,14) calculation.
Fig. 8Suitability of 8, 10–14 for singlet fission according to energy matching condition of the S1 and T1 states. Error bars relate to the root mean square deviation for the S1 states from the experimentally available values.
Fig. 9Suitability of investigated diradicaloids for singlet fission according to energy matching condition of S1 and T1 states (left; 10 has been omitted for clarity) and the value of the diradical indices y0 and y1 (right). Error bars relate to the root mean square deviation for the S1 states from the experimentally available values.
Fig. 10The NFOD is a good descriptor for the singlet–triplet gap.164