Literature DB >> 30089905

Ecosystem warming extends vegetation activity but heightens vulnerability to cold temperatures.

Andrew D Richardson1,2,3, Koen Hufkens4, Thomas Milliman5, Donald M Aubrecht4, Morgan E Furze4, Bijan Seyednasrollah4,6,7, Misha B Krassovski8, John M Latimer8, W Robert Nettles8, Ryan R Heiderman8, Jeffrey M Warren8, Paul J Hanson8.   

Abstract

Shifts in vegetation phenology are a key example of the biological effects of climate change1-3. However, there is substantial uncertainty about whether these temperature-driven trends will continue, or whether other factors-for example, photoperiod-will become more important as warming exceeds the bounds of historical variability4,5. Here we use phenological transition dates derived from digital repeat photography6 to show that experimental whole-ecosystem warming treatments7 of up to +9 °C linearly correlate with a delayed autumn green-down and advanced spring green-up of the dominant woody species in a boreal Picea-Sphagnum bog. Results were confirmed by direct observation of both vegetative and reproductive phenology of these and other bog plant species, and by multiple years of observations. There was little evidence that the observed responses were constrained by photoperiod. Our results indicate a likely extension of the period of vegetation activity by 1-2 weeks under a 'CO2 stabilization' climate scenario (+2.6 ± 0.7 °C), and 3-6 weeks under a 'high-CO2 emission' scenario (+5.9 ± 1.1 °C), by the end of the twenty-first century. We also observed severe tissue mortality in the warmest enclosures after a severe spring frost event. Failure to cue to photoperiod resulted in precocious green-up and a premature loss of frost hardiness8, which suggests that vulnerability to spring frost damage will increase in a warmer world9,10. Vegetation strategies that have evolved to balance tradeoffs associated with phenological temperature tracking may be optimal under historical climates, but these strategies may not be optimized for future climate regimes. These in situ experimental results are of particular importance because boreal forests have both a circumpolar distribution and a key role in the global carbon cycle11.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30089905     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0399-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  22 in total

1.  Visible and near-infrared hyperspectral indices explain more variation in lower-crown leaf nitrogen concentrations in autumn than in summer.

Authors:  Kathryn I Wheeler; Delphis F Levia; Rodrigo Vargas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Urban warming advances spring phenology but reduces the response of phenology to temperature in the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Lin Meng; Jiafu Mao; Yuyu Zhou; Andrew D Richardson; Xuhui Lee; Peter E Thornton; Daniel M Ricciuto; Xuecao Li; Yongjiu Dai; Xiaoying Shi; Gensuo Jia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Phenological responses of temperate and boreal trees to warming depend on ambient spring temperatures, leaf habit, and geographic range.

Authors:  Rebecca A Montgomery; Karen E Rice; Artur Stefanski; Roy L Rich; Peter B Reich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Woody species do not differ in dormancy progression: Differences in time to budbreak due to forcing and cold hardiness.

Authors:  Al P Kovaleski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  The effect of urbanization on plant phenology depends on regional temperature.

Authors:  Daijiang Li; Brian J Stucky; John Deck; Benjamin Baiser; Robert P Guralnick
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 15.460

6.  Soil metabolome response to whole-ecosystem warming at the Spruce and Peatland Responses under Changing Environments experiment.

Authors:  Rachel M Wilson; Malak M Tfaily; Max Kolton; Eric R Johnston; Caitlin Petro; Cassandra A Zalman; Paul J Hanson; Heino M Heyman; Jennifer E Kyle; David W Hoyt; Elizabeth K Eder; Samuel O Purvine; Randall K Kolka; Stephen D Sebestyen; Natalie A Griffiths; Christopher W Schadt; Jason K Keller; Scott D Bridgham; Jeffrey P Chanton; Joel E Kostka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Transgenerational effects in asexually reproduced offspring of Populus.

Authors:  Sumitra Dewan; Pieter De Frenne; An Vanden Broeck; Marijke Steenackers; Kristine Vander Mijnsbrugge; Kris Verheyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Testing Hopkins' Bioclimatic Law with PhenoCam data.

Authors:  Andrew D Richardson; Koen Hufkens; Xiaolu Li; Toby R Ault
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.936

9.  Shifts in Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Communities and Exploration Types Relate to the Environment and Fine-Root Traits Across Interior Douglas-Fir Forests of Western Canada.

Authors:  Camille E Defrenne; Timothy J Philpott; Shannon H A Guichon; W Jean Roach; Brian J Pickles; Suzanne W Simard
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  PhenoCams for Field Phenotyping: Using Very High Temporal Resolution Digital Repeated Photography to Investigate Interactions of Growth, Phenology, and Harvest Traits.

Authors:  Helge Aasen; Norbert Kirchgessner; Achim Walter; Frank Liebisch
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.