Megan Sweeney1, Kaavya Paruchuri2, Saul N Weingart1. 1. Department of Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 2. Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are few published studies of the use of portable or handheld computers in health care, but these devices have the potential to transform multiple aspects of clinical teaching and practice. OBJECTIVE: This article assesses resident physicians' perceptions and experiences with tablet computers before and after the introduction of these devices. METHODS: We surveyed 49 resident physicians from 8 neurology, surgery, and internal medicine clinical services before and after the introduction of tablet computers at a 415-bed Boston teaching hospital. The surveys queried respondents about their assessment of tablet computers, including the perceived impact of tablets on clinical tasks, job satisfaction, time spent at work, and quality of patient care. RESULTS: Respondents reported that it was easier (73%) and faster (70%) to use a tablet computer than to search for an available desktop. Tablets were useful for reviewing data, writing notes, and entering orders. Respondents indicated that tablet computers increased their job satisfaction (84%), reduced the amount of time spent in the hospital (51%), and improved the quality of care (65%). CONCLUSION: The introduction of tablet computers enhanced resident physicians' perceptions of efficiency, effectiveness, and job satisfaction. Investments in this technology are warranted. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: There are few published studies of the use of portable or handheld computers in health care, but these devices have the potential to transform multiple aspects of clinical teaching and practice. OBJECTIVE: This article assesses resident physicians' perceptions and experiences with tablet computers before and after the introduction of these devices. METHODS: We surveyed 49 resident physicians from 8 neurology, surgery, and internal medicine clinical services before and after the introduction of tablet computers at a 415-bed Boston teaching hospital. The surveys queried respondents about their assessment of tablet computers, including the perceived impact of tablets on clinical tasks, job satisfaction, time spent at work, and quality of patient care. RESULTS: Respondents reported that it was easier (73%) and faster (70%) to use a tablet computer than to search for an available desktop. Tablets were useful for reviewing data, writing notes, and entering orders. Respondents indicated that tablet computers increased their job satisfaction (84%), reduced the amount of time spent in the hospital (51%), and improved the quality of care (65%). CONCLUSION: The introduction of tablet computers enhanced resident physicians' perceptions of efficiency, effectiveness, and job satisfaction. Investments in this technology are warranted. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Authors: Seth J Berkowitz; Justin W Kung; Ronald L Eisenberg; Kevin Donohoe; Leo L Tsai; Priscilla J Slanetz Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Larry F Chu; Matthew J Erlendson; John S Sun; Heather L Alva; Anna M Clemenson Journal: Curr Opin Anaesthesiol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.706
Authors: Sven Y Vetter; Svenja Schüler; Matthes Hackbusch; Michael Müller; Benedict Swartman; Marc Schnetzke; Paul Alfred Grützner; Jochen Franke Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Neda Ratanawongsa; Jennifer L Barton; Courtney R Lyles; Michael Wu; Edward H Yelin; Diana Martinez; Dean Schillinger Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: G D Schiff; M G Amato; T Eguale; J J Boehne; A Wright; R Koppel; A H Rashidee; R B Elson; D L Whitney; T-T Thach; D W Bates; A C Seger Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Christine Sinsky; Lacey Colligan; Ling Li; Mirela Prgomet; Sam Reynolds; Lindsey Goeders; Johanna Westbrook; Michael Tutty; George Blike Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: David C Radley; Melanie R Wasserman; Lauren Ew Olsho; Sarah J Shoemaker; Mark D Spranca; Bethany Bradshaw Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 4.497