Literature DB >> 30089024

Real-time slacking as a default mode of grip force control: implications for force minimization and personal grip force variation.

Brendan W Smith1, Justin B Rowe2, David J Reinkensmeyer2,3.   

Abstract

During trial-to-trial movement adaptation, the motor system systematically reduces extraneous muscle forces when kinematic errors experienced on previous movements are small, a phenomenon termed "slacking." There is also growing evidence that the motor system slacks continuously (i.e., in real-time) during arm movement or grip force control, but the initiation of this slacking is not well-characterized, obfuscating its physiological cause. Here, we addressed this issue by asking participants ( n = 32) to track discrete force targets presented visually using isometric grip force, then applying a brief, subtle error-clamp to that visual feedback on random trials. Participants reduced their force in an exponential fashion, on these error-clamp trials, except when the target force was <10% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). This force drift began <250 ms after the onset of the error-clamp, consistent with slacking being an ongoing process unmasked immediately after the motor system finished reacting to the last veridical feedback. Above 10% MVC, the slacking rate increased linearly with grip force magnitude. Grip force variation was approximately 50-100% higher with veridical feedback, largely due to heightened signal power at ~1 Hz, the band of visuomotor feedback control. Finally, the slacking rate measured for each participant during error-clamp trials correlated with their force variation during control trials. That is, participants who slacked more had greater force variation. These results suggest that real-time slacking continuously reduces grip force until visual error prompts correction. Whereas such slacking is suited for force minimization, it may also account for ~30% of the variability in personal grip force variation. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY We provide evidence that a form of slacking continuously conditions real-time grip force production. This slacking is well-suited to promote efficiency but is expected to increase force variation by triggering additional feedback corrections. Moreover, we show that the rate at which a person slacks is substantially correlated with the variation of their grip force. In combination, at the neurophysiological level, our results suggest slacking is caused by one or more relatively smooth neural adaptations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  force drift; human force control; motor adaptation; motor variability; visuomotor tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30089024      PMCID: PMC6230778          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00700.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  73 in total

1.  Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Daniel M Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The nature of constant and cyclic force production: unintentional force-drift characteristics.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; Daniela Mattos; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Control of fast-reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations.

Authors:  Andrea d'Avella; Alessandro Portone; Laure Fernandez; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Gary Liaw; Theodore E Milner; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Adaptation to selective visual scaling of short time scale processes in isometric force.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Finger force changes in the absence of visual feedback in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Satyajit Ambike; Mechelle M Lewis; Xuemei Huang; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Motor synergies and the equilibrium-point hypothesis.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.422

9.  Unintentional movements induced by sequential transient perturbations in a multi-joint positional task.

Authors:  Tao Zhou; Ali Falaki; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Visuomotor adaptation: how forgetting keeps us conservative.

Authors:  Katinka van der Kooij; Eli Brenner; Robert J van Beers; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Expectation of volitional arm movement has prolonged effects on the grip force exerted on a pinched object.

Authors:  Anvesh Naik; Satyajit Ambike
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Force variability is mostly not motor noise: Theoretical implications for motor control.

Authors:  Akira Nagamori; Christopher M Laine; Gerald E Loeb; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.