Literature DB >> 30088099

In vitro and field efficacy of fungicides against sheath blight of rice and post-harvest fungicide residue in soil, husk, and brown rice using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Pankaj Kumar1, Sushil Ahlawat2, Reena Chauhan2, Anil Kumar3, Ram Singh3, Ashwani Kumar3.   

Abstract

Rice is a staple food for about 65% of the India's population. India ranks first in area under rice and second in production of rice in the world. In India, it is cultivated over 43.39 m ha with a production and productivity of 104.32 million tons and 2404 kg/ha, respectively. Besides ensuring food security of the nation, it is an export commodity and earns a huge foreign exchange. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of five fungicides against Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn AG-1 IA, inciting sheath blight of rice in vitro and under field conditions along with post-harvest residue of the fungicides found effective in disease management. In vitro growth inhibition tests revealed that the EC50 values of azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, pencycuron 22.9% SC, thifluzamide 23.9% SC, hexaconazole 4% + zineb 68% WP, and validamycin 3% L against Rhizoctonia solani ranged from 0.006 to 354.81 ppm a.i., whereas the corresponding EC90 values were 0.758 to 1202.26 ppm a.i. Thifluzamide 23.9% SC was found to be the most inhibitory with EC50 and EC90 values of 0.006 and 0.758 ppm a.i. followed by hexaconazole 4% + zineb 68% WP. The complete inhibition of sclerotia formation was observed at 1 ppm, 20 ppm, and 25 ppm a.i. of thifluzamide 23.9% SC, hexaconazole 4% + zineb 68% WP, and azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC, respectively. In field trials, azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC was the best treatment in reducing sheath blight and in enhancing grain yield of rice followed by thifluzamide 23.9% SC, pencycuron 22.9% SC, and validamycin 3% L, whereas hexaconazole 4% + zineb 68% WP was the least effective fungicide. Benefit-cost ratio (B:C) of different fungicides reflected that pencycuron 22.9% SC (B:C 5.06) and azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC(B:C 4.65) sprayed at single/recommended doses of 1 ml/l were highly economical in managing sheath blight disease of rice. Double dose of pencycuron 22.9% SC further enhanced the B:C to 7.24 while the double dose of azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC was less economical (B:C 2.84) compared to their recommended doses. Samples of rice matrices were processed using QuEChERS method and analyzed for the presence of fungicide residues by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). The post-harvest residues of azoxystrobin, difenoconazole, and pencycuron, sprayed at single/recommended and double doses with a pre-harvest interval (PHI) of 44 days, were found below the limit of quantification (LOQ), i.e., 0.01 and 0.005 mg kg-1 for azoxystrobin and difenoconazole and 0.05 mg kg-1 for pencycuron in brown rice, cropped soil, paddy straw, and husk. These results clearly demonstrated that treatment of azoxystrobin 18.2% + difenoconazole 11.4% SC and pencycuron 22.9% SC could be taken as safe for crop protection and environmental contamination point of view. The findings of this research work will have a positive impact on rice export and use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Azoxystrobin; Bioefficacy; Difenoconazole; Pencycuron; Post-harvest fungicide residue; Rhizoctonia solani

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30088099     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6897-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Dissipation of epoxiconazole in the paddy field under subtropical conditions of Taiwan.

Authors:  H T Lin; S S Wong; G C Li
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health B       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Status of insecticide contamination of soil and water in Haryana, India.

Authors:  Beena Kumari; V K Madan; T S Kathpal
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Dissipation of difenoconazole in rice, paddy soil, and paddy water under field conditions.

Authors:  K Wang; J X Wu; H Y Zhang
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.291

4.  Pesticide residue analysis of soil, water, and grain of IPM basmati rice.

Authors:  Sumitra Arora; Irani Mukherji; Aman Kumar; R K Tanwar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  The evolution and pathogenic mechanisms of the rice sheath blight pathogen.

Authors:  Aiping Zheng; Runmao Lin; Danhua Zhang; Peigang Qin; Lizhi Xu; Peng Ai; Lei Ding; Yanran Wang; Yao Chen; Yao Liu; Zhigang Sun; Haitao Feng; Xiaoxing Liang; Rongtao Fu; Changqing Tang; Qiao Li; Jing Zhang; Zelin Xie; Qiming Deng; Shuangcheng Li; Shiquan Wang; Jun Zhu; Lingxia Wang; Huainian Liu; Ping Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Persistence and decontamination studies of chlorantraniliprole in Capsicum annum using GC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Sushil Ahlawat; Suman Gulia; Kamla Malik; Savita Rani; Reena Chauhan
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Rhizoctonia solani Kühn Pathophysiology: Status and Prospects of Sheath Blight Disease Management in Rice.

Authors:  Manoranjan Senapati; Ajit Tiwari; Neha Sharma; Priya Chandra; Bishnu Maya Bashyal; Ranjith Kumar Ellur; Prolay Kumar Bhowmick; Haritha Bollinedi; K K Vinod; Ashok Kumar Singh; S Gopala Krishnan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Sheath blight of rice: a review and identification of priorities for future research.

Authors:  Pooja Singh; Purabi Mazumdar; Jennifer Ann Harikrishna; Subramanian Babu
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.540

4.  Occurrence of Fungicides in Vineyard and the Surrounding Environment.

Authors:  Meruyert Sergazina; Lua Vazquez; Maria Llompart; Thierry Dagnac
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.