Literature DB >> 30088069

Muscle mass estimation on breast magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients: comparison between psoas muscle area on computer tomography and pectoralis muscle area on MRI.

Federica Rossi1, Francesca Valdora2, Emanuele Barabino2, Massimo Calabrese3, Alberto Stefano Tagliafico2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation between psoas muscle area (TPA) on CT images and pectoralis muscle area (PMA) on MRI in breast cancer patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study was institutional review board approved and women involved gave written informed consent. Twenty six patients with both body CT and breast MRI available were evaluated. Two radiologists calculated TPA on 1.25-mm and 5-mm body CT images. Two radiologists measured PMA on axial T1-weighted images. Statistical analysis included inter- and intra-reader agreement and correlation between TPA on CT and PMA on MRI.
RESULTS: The Pearson r correlation coefficient was 0.70 (95% CI 0.41-0.81) and the coefficient of determination was 0.49. The inter-reader agreement was k = 0.85 and k = 0.79 for axial 1.25-mm and 5-mm CT images, respectively. The intra-reader agreement of reader 1 was k = 0.98 and k = 0.94 for 1.25-mm and 5-mm CT images, respectively. The intra-reader agreement of reader 2 was k = 0.95 and k = 0.94 for 1.25-mm and 5-mm CT images, respectively. On axial T1-weighted images, the inter-reader agreement for radiologists evaluating the PMA was k = 0.61. Intra-observer agreement of reader 1 and reader 2 for PMA estimation was good (0.62 and 0.64), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The correlation between TPA on CT images and PMA on MRI was very good. Pectoralis muscle area on breast MRI could be useful to estimate muscle mass in women with breast cancer. KEY POINTS: • Pectoralis muscle area can be estimated on breast MRI • Total psoas area on CT and pectoralis muscle area on MRI are strongly correlated • Pectoralis muscle area on breast MRI could estimate the skeletal muscle mass.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Muscle mass; Pectoralis muscle; Psoas muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30088069     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5663-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

Review 1.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Prevalence and prognostic effect of sarcopenia in breast cancer survivors: the HEAL Study.

Authors:  Adriana Villaseñor; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Kathy Baumgartner; Richard Baumgartner; Leslie Bernstein; Anne McTiernan; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): final results.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Franca Podo; Filippo Santoro; Siranoush Manoukian; Silvana Bergonzi; Giovanna Trecate; Daniele Vergnaghi; Massimo Federico; Laura Cortesi; Stefano Corcione; Sandro Morassut; Cosimo Di Maggio; Anna Cilotti; Laura Martincich; Massimo Calabrese; Chiara Zuiani; Lorenzo Preda; Bernardo Bonanni; Luca A Carbonaro; Alma Contegiacomo; Pietro Panizza; Ernesto Di Cesare; Antonella Savarese; Marcello Crecco; Daniela Turchetti; Maura Tonutti; Paolo Belli; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 5.  Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Hans Messersmith; Petrina Causer; Andrea Eisen; Rene Shumak; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The relationship between body composition and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Egidio Del Fabbro; Henrique Parsons; Carla L Warneke; Kalyan Pulivarthi; Jennifer K Litton; Rony Dev; Shana L Palla; Abenaa Brewster; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-08-17

7.  Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Mark Punyanitya; ZiMian Wang; Dympna Gallagher; Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Jeanine Albu; Steven B Heymsfield; Stanley Heshka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-08-13

8.  Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment.

Authors:  Carla M M Prado; Vickie E Baracos; Linda J McCargar; Tony Reiman; Marina Mourtzakis; Katia Tonkin; John R Mackey; Sheryl Koski; Edith Pituskin; Michael B Sawyer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) "cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases" and "nutrition in geriatrics".

Authors:  M Muscaritoli; S D Anker; J Argilés; Z Aversa; J M Bauer; G Biolo; Y Boirie; I Bosaeus; T Cederholm; P Costelli; K C Fearon; A Laviano; M Maggio; F Rossi Fanelli; S M Schneider; A Schols; C C Sieber
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 7.324

10.  Simple psoas cross-sectional area measurement is a quick and easy method to assess sarcopenia and predicts major surgical complications.

Authors:  K I Jones; B Doleman; S Scott; J N Lund; J P Williams
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preoperative Pectoralis Muscle Index Predicts Distant Metastasis-Free Survival in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Wen-Juan Huang; Meng-Lin Zhang; Wen Wang; Qing-Chun Jia; Jia-Rui Yuan; Xin Zhang; Shuang Fu; Yu-Xi Liu; Shi-di Miao; Rui-Tao Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Fasting-mimicking diet and hormone therapy induce breast cancer regression.

Authors:  Irene Caffa; Vanessa Spagnolo; Valter D Longo; Alessio Nencioni; Claudio Vernieri; Francesca Valdemarin; Pamela Becherini; Min Wei; Sebastian Brandhorst; Chiara Zucal; Else Driehuis; Lorenzo Ferrando; Francesco Piacente; Alberto Tagliafico; Michele Cilli; Luca Mastracci; Valerio G Vellone; Silvano Piazza; Anna Laura Cremonini; Raffaella Gradaschi; Carolina Mantero; Mario Passalacqua; Alberto Ballestrero; Gabriele Zoppoli; Michele Cea; Annalisa Arrighi; Patrizio Odetti; Fiammetta Monacelli; Giulia Salvadori; Salvatore Cortellino; Hans Clevers; Filippo De Braud; Samir G Sukkar; Alessandro Provenzani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Radiologic Definition of Sarcopenia in Chronic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Chul-Min Lee; Bo Kyeong Kang; Mimi Kim
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 4.  Sarcopenia: how to measure, when and why.

Authors:  Alberto Stefano Tagliafico; Bianca Bignotti; Lorenzo Torri; Federica Rossi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.469

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.