PURPOSE: Body composition has emerged as an important prognostic factor in cancer patients. Severe depletion of skeletal muscle (sarcopenia) and, hence, of overall lean body mass may represent an occult condition in individuals with normal or even high body weight. Sarcopenia has been associated with poor performance status, 5-fluorouracil toxicity, and shortened survival in cancer patients. Here, we prospectively studied patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving capecitabine treatment in order to determine if sarcopenia was associated with a higher incidence of toxicity and a shorter time to tumor progression (TTP). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Fifty-five women with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracycline and/or taxane treatment were included. Skeletal muscle cross-sectional area at the third lumbar vertebra was measured by computerized tomography, and sarcopenia was defined using a previously published cutoff point. Toxicity was assessed after cycle 1 of treatment, and TTP was determined prospectively. RESULTS: Approximately 25% of patients were classified as sarcopenic, and this feature was seen in normal weight, overweight, and obese individuals. Toxicity was present in 50% of sarcopenic patients, compared with only 20% of nonsarcopenic patients (P = 0.03), and TTP was shorter in sarcopenic patients (101.4 days; confidence interval, 59.8-142.9) versus nonsarcopenic patients (173.3 days; confidence interval, 126.1-220.5; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia is a significant predictor of toxicity and TTP in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine. Our results raise the potential use of body composition assessment to predict toxicity and individualize chemotherapy dosing.
PURPOSE: Body composition has emerged as an important prognostic factor in cancerpatients. Severe depletion of skeletal muscle (sarcopenia) and, hence, of overall lean body mass may represent an occult condition in individuals with normal or even high body weight. Sarcopenia has been associated with poor performance status, 5-fluorouraciltoxicity, and shortened survival in cancerpatients. Here, we prospectively studied patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving capecitabine treatment in order to determine if sarcopenia was associated with a higher incidence of toxicity and a shorter time to tumor progression (TTP). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Fifty-five women with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracycline and/or taxane treatment were included. Skeletal muscle cross-sectional area at the third lumbar vertebra was measured by computerized tomography, and sarcopenia was defined using a previously published cutoff point. Toxicity was assessed after cycle 1 of treatment, and TTP was determined prospectively. RESULTS: Approximately 25% of patients were classified as sarcopenic, and this feature was seen in normal weight, overweight, and obese individuals. Toxicity was present in 50% of sarcopenic patients, compared with only 20% of nonsarcopenic patients (P = 0.03), and TTP was shorter in sarcopenic patients (101.4 days; confidence interval, 59.8-142.9) versus nonsarcopenic patients (173.3 days; confidence interval, 126.1-220.5; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION:Sarcopenia is a significant predictor of toxicity and TTP in metastatic breast cancerpatients treated with capecitabine. Our results raise the potential use of body composition assessment to predict toxicity and individualize chemotherapy dosing.
Authors: Thomas W Buford; Stephen D Anton; Andrew R Judge; Emanuele Marzetti; Stephanie E Wohlgemuth; Christy S Carter; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Marco Pahor; Todd M Manini Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Shlomit Strulov Shachar; Allison M Deal; Marc Weinberg; Grant R Williams; Kirsten A Nyrop; Karteek Popuri; Seul Ki Choi; Hyman B Muss Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: R Cohen; L H Preta; V Joste; E Curis; O Huillard; A Jouinot; C Narjoz; A Thomas-Schoemann; A Bellesoeur; M Tiako Meyo; J Quilichini; D Desaulle; I Nicolis; A Cessot; M Vidal; F Goldwasser; J Alexandre; B Blanchet Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Thomas A Blackwell; Igor Cervenka; Bhuwan Khatri; Jacob L Brown; Megan E Rosa-Caldwell; David E Lee; Richard A Perry; Lemuel A Brown; Wesley S Haynie; Michael P Wiggs; Walter G Bottje; Tyrone A Washington; Byungwhi C Kong; Jorge L Ruas; Nicholas P Greene Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: C Matthew Kinsey; Raul San José Estépar; Jos van der Velden; Bernard F Cole; David C Christiani; George R Washko Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 4.254