Literature DB >> 30087426

Development and validation of a novel automated Gleason grade and molecular profile that define a highly predictive prostate cancer progression algorithm-based test.

Michael J Donovan1, Gerardo Fernandez2, Richard Scott2, Faisal M Khan2, Jack Zeineh2, Giovanni Koll2, Nataliya Gladoun2, Elizabeth Charytonowicz2, Ash Tewari3, Carlos Cordon-Cardo4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative risk assessment remains an important variable in the effective treatment of prostate cancer. There is an unmet clinical need for a test with the potential to enhance the Gleason grading system with novel features that more accurately reflect a personalized prediction of clinical failure.
METHODS: A prospectively designed retrospective study utilizing 892 patients, post radical prostatectomy, followed for a median of 8 years. In training, using digital image analysis to combine microscopic pattern analysis/machine learning with biomarkers, we evaluated Precise Post-op model results to predict clinical failure in 446 patients. The derived prognostic score was validated in 446 patients. Eligible subjects required complete clinical-pathologic variables and were excluded if they had received neoadjuvant treatment including androgen deprivation, radiation or chemotherapy prior to surgery. No patients were enrolled with metastatic disease prior to surgery. Evaluate the assay using time to event concordance index (C-index), Kaplan-Meier, and hazards ratio.
RESULTS: In the training cohort (n = 306), the Precise Post-op test predicted significant clinical failure with a C-index of 0.82, [95% CI: 0.76-0.86], HR:6.7, [95% CI: 3.59-12.45], p < 0.00001. Results were confirmed in validation (n = 284) with a C-index 0.77 [95% CI: 0.72-0.81], HR = 5.4, [95% CI: 2.74-10.52], p < 0.00001. By comparison, a clinical feature base model had a C-index of 0.70 with a HR = 3.7. The Post-Op test also re-classified 58% of CAPRA-S intermediate risk patients as low risk for clinical failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Precise Post-op tissue-based test discriminates low from intermediate high risk prostate cancer disease progression in the postoperative setting. Guided by machine learning, the test enhances traditional Gleason grading with novel features that accurately reflect the biology of personalized risk assignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30087426     DOI: 10.1038/s41391-018-0067-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  3 in total

Review 1.  Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Simon Hein; Gerd Reis; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Bioinformatic profiling of prognosis-related genes in the breast cancer immune microenvironment.

Authors:  Fang Bai; Yuchun Jin; Peng Zhang; Hongliang Chen; Yipeng Fu; Mingdi Zhang; Ziyi Weng; Kejin Wu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  A Deep Learning Approach to Diagnostic Classification of Prostate Cancer Using Pathology-Radiology Fusion.

Authors:  Pegah Khosravi; Maria Lysandrou; Mahmoud Eljalby; Qianzi Li; Ehsan Kazemi; Pantelis Zisimopoulos; Alexandros Sigaras; Matthew Brendel; Josue Barnes; Camir Ricketts; Dmitry Meleshko; Andy Yat; Timothy D McClure; Brian D Robinson; Andrea Sboner; Olivier Elemento; Bilal Chughtai; Iman Hajirasouliha
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 4.813

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.