| Literature DB >> 30086701 |
Anna Skoracka1, Luís Filipe Lopes2, Maria Judite Alves2, Adam Miller3,4, Mariusz Lewandowski5, Wiktoria Szydło6, Agnieszka Majer7, Elżbieta Różańska8, Lechosław Kuczyński7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the mechanisms that underlie the diversification of herbivores through interactions with their hosts is important for their diversity assessment and identification of expansion events, particularly in a human-altered world where evolutionary processes can be exacerbated. We studied patterns of host usage and genetic structure in the wheat curl mite complex (WCM), Aceria tosichella, a major pest of the world's grain industry, to identify the factors behind its extensive diversification.Entities:
Keywords: Aceria tosichella; Demographic history; Genetic diversity; Host-associations; Lineage diversification; Species delimitation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30086701 PMCID: PMC6081818 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1234-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1a Bayesian inference (BI) tree constructed using the GTR + G model for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (Cox1) sequences of the wheat curl mite (WCM) species complex and outgroup species. WCM individuals on the tree are colored according to their grass host species; color boxes correspond to cultivated grasses (cereals) and color labels correspond to non-cultivated grasses. Sequence labels correspond to data in Additional file 1: Table S1and include information about the host species and geographic locality. Vertical bars indicate particular WCM lineages, and these of strict specialists (s) are colored according to their specific host plants. Lineages associated with several hosts are designated as generalists (g), and lineages found on two hosts with higher prevalence on one of them are designated as semi-specialists (ss). Numbers above branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities; only values > 0.6 are shown. b Results of combined Poisson Tree Processes model for species delimitation (PTP) and a Bayesian implementation of PTP (bPTP) identifying additional putative species groups within MT-1, MT-3, MT-6, MT-9, MT-12, MT-17 MT-18, and MT-26 lineages. Blue lines indicate the unique species groups and red clades indicate species groups contained more than one haplotypes. Numbers above the branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities
Fig. 2Bayesian inference (BI) tree constructed using the GTR + G model for the haplotypes of 28S rDNA D2 region of the wheat curl mite (WCM) species complex and outgroup species. Numbers above branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities; only values > 0.6 are shown
Fig. 3Time calibrated mitochondrial Cox1 gene tree showing mean values in million years (mya) above branches and the 95% HPD bars for divergence time on nodes. Color boxes indicate events that may explain the diversification and divergence of WCM lineages
Demographic analyses and recent expansion time for WCM lineages (for those with N ≥ 15). The estimates of neutrality tests for each lineage were determined by Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs statistics. The validity of sudden expansion model was tested by mismatch distributions: SSD, the sum of square deviations; HRag, the raggedness index
| WCM lineage | Tajima’s D | Fu’s Fs | SSD ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MT-1 | −1.3236 (0.0760) | −3.7391 (0.0730) | 0.0293 (0.062) | 0.0428 (0.246) | 27,000 |
| MT-2 | 1.4104 (0.0650) | −1.0015 (0.2720) | 0.0332 (0.223) | 0.0406 (0.427) | 290,000 |
| MT-3 |
|
| 0.0003 (0.910) | 0.0145 (0.724) | 160,000 |
| MT-4 |
|
| 0.0047 (0.901) | 0.0231 (0.948) | 165,000 |
| MT-5 | −0.8571 (0.2170) |
| 0.0029 (0.545) | 0.0117 (0.651) | 440,000 |
| MT-7 | 1.5945 (0.9500) | 2.1540 (0.8730) |
| 0.2901 (0.063) | 390,000 |
| MT-8 |
|
| 0.0024 (0.279) | 0.0298 (0.298) | 86,000 |
| MT-9 | 1.0643 (0.8900) | 1.4746 (0.3410) |
| 0.0144 (0.186) | 995,000 |
P < 0.05 are bolded; all others are not significant
Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) for generalist WCM lineages with host as a grouping variable
| Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | % variation | FST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MT-1 | |||||
| Among hosts | 7 | 14.91 | −0.13294 | −5.01 | |
| Within hosts | 41 | 113.46 | 2.76733 | 105.01 | −0.0501 |
| Total | 48 | 128.37 | 2.63539 | ||
| MT-2 | |||||
| Among hosts | 3 | 21.70 | 2.42727 | 44.13 | |
| Within host | 10 | 30.73 | 3.07273 | 55.87 | 0.44132 |
| Total | 13 | 52.43 | 5.50000 | ||
| MT-3 | |||||
| Among hosts | 7 | 14.01 | 0.02645 | 1.69 | |
| Within host | 311 | 479.58 | 1.54205 | 98.31 | 0.01686 |
| Total | 318 | 493.59 | 1.56850 | ||
| MT-4 | |||||
| Among hosts | 7 | 10.27 | 0.09861 | 7.70 | |
| Within host | 23 | 27.20 | 1.18244 | 92.30 | 0.07697 |
| Total | 30 | 37.45 | 1.28104 | ||
| MT-8 | |||||
| Among hosts | 10 | 23.88 | 0.09467 | 6.90 | |
| Within host | 154 | 196.68 | 1.27714 | 93.10 | 0.06901 |
| Total | 164 | 220.56 | 1.37181 | ||
d.f deegres of freedom, F Fixation index