Kevin Bui1,2, Vikram Kilambi3, James R Rodrigue4, Sanjay Mehrotra1,2,5. 1. Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. 2. Center for Engineering and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 3. RAND Corporation, Boston, MA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 5. Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recorded at the time of transplant and reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, patient's functional status is measured using the Karnofsky performance score (KPS), ranging 0 to 100. Functional status analysis may provide insights on candidate listing and posttransplant survival outcomes for deceased-donor kidney transplants. METHODS: The cohort consisted of adult deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients transplanted beginning January 2007. One-year and 3-year Cox models for posttransplant survival were fitted with current Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) variables and KPS. Comparative analyses were performed between the SRTR model without KPS and augmented model with it. Using the augmented model, we examined the impact of Kidney Donor Profile Index on posttransplant survivals for 5 different KPS strata: 10 to 30, 40 to 50, 60 to 70, 80 to 90, and 100. RESULTS: Comparative analyses showed that KPS was a statistically significant predictor for posttransplant survival: it improved model calibration, discrimination, and predictive accuracy. From the augmented model, the survival curves illustrated that recipients with KPS 40 to 50 and kidneys with Kidney Donor Profile Index as high as 99 have expected survival probabilities of above 90% in 1 year and above 80% in 3 years. The expected survival probabilities improve as KPS increases. Recipients with KPS 10 to 30 have the worst survival probability, even if they received high-quality kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: Insights from the survival analyses recommend possible inclusion of functional status into SRTR's risk-adjusted models. Moreover, they invite further examination of its use to improve current listing and transplantation strategies at transplant centers and potentially reduce deceased-donor kidney discard rate.
BACKGROUND: Recorded at the time of transplant and reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, patient's functional status is measured using the Karnofsky performance score (KPS), ranging 0 to 100. Functional status analysis may provide insights on candidate listing and posttransplant survival outcomes for deceased-donor kidney transplants. METHODS: The cohort consisted of adult deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients transplanted beginning January 2007. One-year and 3-year Cox models for posttransplant survival were fitted with current Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) variables and KPS. Comparative analyses were performed between the SRTR model without KPS and augmented model with it. Using the augmented model, we examined the impact of Kidney Donor Profile Index on posttransplant survivals for 5 different KPS strata: 10 to 30, 40 to 50, 60 to 70, 80 to 90, and 100. RESULTS: Comparative analyses showed that KPS was a statistically significant predictor for posttransplant survival: it improved model calibration, discrimination, and predictive accuracy. From the augmented model, the survival curves illustrated that recipients with KPS 40 to 50 and kidneys with Kidney Donor Profile Index as high as 99 have expected survival probabilities of above 90% in 1 year and above 80% in 3 years. The expected survival probabilities improve as KPS increases. Recipients with KPS 10 to 30 have the worst survival probability, even if they received high-quality kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: Insights from the survival analyses recommend possible inclusion of functional status into SRTR's risk-adjusted models. Moreover, they invite further examination of its use to improve current listing and transplantation strategies at transplant centers and potentially reduce deceased-donor kidney discard rate.
Authors: Peter P Reese; Roy D Bloom; Justine Shults; Arwin Thomasson; Adam Mussell; Sylvia E Rosas; Kirsten L Johansen; Peter Abt; Matthew Levine; Arthur Caplan; Harold I Feldman; Jason Karlawish Journal: Transplantation Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: A Hart; J M Smith; M A Skeans; S K Gustafson; A R Wilk; A Robinson; J L Wainright; C R Haynes; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske; A K Israni Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: J D Schold; L D Buccini; T R Srinivas; R T Srinivas; E D Poggio; S M Flechner; C Soria; D L Segev; J Fung; D A Goldfarb Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: D M Dickinson; T H Shearon; J O'Keefe; H-H Wong; C L Berg; J D Rosendale; F L Delmonico; R L Webb; R A Wolfe Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: M Abecassis; N D Bridges; C J Clancy; M A Dew; B Eldadah; M J Englesbe; M F Flessner; J C Frank; J Friedewald; J Gill; C Gries; J B Halter; E L Hartmann; W R Hazzard; F M Horne; J Hosenpud; P Jacobson; B L Kasiske; J Lake; R Loomba; P N Malani; T M Moore; A Murray; M-H Nguyen; N R Powe; P P Reese; H Reynolds; M D Samaniego; K E Schmader; D L Segev; A S Shah; L G Singer; J A Sosa; Z A Stewart; J C Tan; W W Williams; D W Zaas; K P High Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Marion Hemmersbach-Miller; Barbara D Alexander; Debra L Sudan; Carl Pieper; Kenneth E Schmader Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Alvin G Thomas; Jessica M Ruck; Nadia M Chu; Dayawa Agoons; Ashton A Shaffer; Christine E Haugen; Bonnielin Swenor; Silas P Norman; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Vikram Kilambi; Kevin Bui; Gordon B Hazen; John J Friedewald; Daniela P Ladner; Bruce Kaplan; Sanjay Mehrotra Journal: Transplantation Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Krista L Lentine; Tarek Alhamad; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Jane C Tan; Su-Hsin Chang; Matthew Cooper; Darshana M Dadhania; David A Axelrod; Mark A Schnitzler; Rosemary Ouseph; Franco H Cabeza Rivera; Bertram L Kasiske; Kenneth J Woodside; Ronald F Parsons Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2020-08-21
Authors: Meera N Harhay; Maya K Rao; Kenneth J Woodside; Kirsten L Johansen; Krista L Lentine; Stefan G Tullius; Ronald F Parsons; Tarek Alhamad; Joseph Berger; XingXing S Cheng; Jaqueline Lappin; Raymond Lynch; Sandesh Parajuli; Jane C Tan; Dorry L Segev; Bruce Kaplan; Jon Kobashigawa; Darshana M Dadhania; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Nadia M Chu; Xiaomeng Chen; Sunjae Bae; Daniel C Brennan; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Transplantation Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 5.385