| Literature DB >> 30084166 |
Jun-Il Yoo1,2,3, Mi-Ji Kim4,2,3, Jae-Bum Na5,2, Yun-Hong Chun6,2, Young-Jin Park1,2, Yongwhi Park7,2,3, Young-Sool Hah2, Yong-Chan Ha8, Ki Soo Park4,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine whether there is correlation between endothelial function and skeletal muscle function measured by hand grip strength in elderly women.Entities:
Keywords: EndoPAT; Endothelial function; Sarcopenia
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30084166 PMCID: PMC6240755 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ISSN: 2190-5991 Impact factor: 12.910
Figure 1(A) Analysis of endothelial function using reactive hyperaemia‐peripheral arterial tonometry index (RHI). (B) Calculation of endothelial function using RHI.
Characteristics of elderly women older than 65 years with the presence or absence of low hand grip strength
| Variables | Normal hand grip strength ( | Low hand grip strength ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 71.4 ± 4.4 | 75.3 ± 4.5 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.4 ± 2.9 | 23.6 ± 3.1 | 0.032 |
| ASM (kg/m2) | 6.0 ± 0.8 | 5.8 ± 1.5 | 0.192 |
| Radiologic knee osteoarthritis (%) | 36 (31.3%) | 43 (35.5%) | 0.491 |
| Osteoporosis (%) | 16 (13.9%) | 44 (36.4%) | <0.001 |
| Gait speed (<0.8 m/s) | 65 (56.5%) | 95 (78.5%) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol (%) | 5 (4.3%) | 11 (9.1%) | 0.147 |
| Current smoking (%) | 4 (3.5%) | 7 (5.8%) | 0.401 |
| Hypertension (%) | 65 (56.5%) | 71 (58.7%) | 0.738 |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 33 (28.7%) | 23 (19%) | 0.080 |
| Hypercholesterolaemia (%) | 17 (14.8%) | 14 (11.6%) | 0.465 |
| Poor nutritional status (%) | 20 (17.4%) | 42 (34.7%) | 0.003 |
| Laboratory findings | |||
| Haemoglobin (mg/dL) | 12.9 ± 1.2 | 12.6 ± 1.1 | 0.018 |
| HOMA IR | 1.7 ± 1.3 | 1.5 ± 1.1 | 0.262 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 1.3 ± 2.2 | 2.6 ± 8.9 | 0.132 |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 9.4 ± 0.4 | 9.3 ± 0.3 | 0.013 |
| 25‐OH vitamin D (ng/mL) | 23.4 ± 9.2 | 26.2 ± 10 | 0.029 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 191.6 ± 41.6 | 201.2 ± 35.6 | 0.058 |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 7.1 ± 0.4 | 7.0 ± 0.4 | 0.037 |
ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle index; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C‐reactive protein; HOMA IR, homoeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance.
Characteristics of elderly women older than 65 years with the presence or absence of endothelial dysfunction
| Variables | Normal endothelial function ( | Endothelial dysfunction ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 72.9 ± 4.5 | 73.7 ± 5 | 0.212 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.0 ± 3.1 | 23.9 ± 3.1 | 0.816 |
| ASM (kg/m2) | 6.0 ± 1.7 | 5.9 ± 0.7 | 0.298 |
| Radiologic knee osteoarthritis (%) | 30 (33.7%) | 49 (33.3%) | 0.953 |
| Osteoporosis (%) | 18 (20.2%) | 42 (28.6%) | 0.154 |
| Hand grip strength (kg) | 20.3 ± 5.4 | 18.1 ± 4.8 | 0.002 |
| Low hand grip strength (%) | 35 (39.3%) | 86 (58.5%) | 0.004 |
| Gait speed (< 0.8 m/s) | 57 (64%) | 103 (70.1%) | 0.337 |
| Alcohol (%) | 6 (6.7%) | 10 (6.8%) | 0.986 |
| Current smoking (%) | 7 (7.9%) | 4 (2.7%) | 0.108 |
| Hypertension (%) | 48 (53.9%) | 88 (59.9%) | 0.371 |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 25 (28.1%) | 31 (21.1%) | 0.220 |
| Hypercholesterolaemia (%) | 15 (16.9%) | 16 (10.9%) | 0.188 |
| Poor nutritional status (%) | 26 (29.2%) | 36 (24.5%) | 0.424 |
| Laboratory findings | |||
| Haemoglobin (mg/dL) | 12.7 ± 1.2 | 12.8 ± 1.1 | 0.704 |
| HOMA IR | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 0.771 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 1.8 ± 6.2 | 2 ± 6.9 | 0.849 |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 9.4 ± 0.4 | 9.3 ± 0.4 | 0.858 |
| 25‐OH vitamin D (ng/mL) | 23.7 ± 9.6 | 25.5 ± 9.8 | 0.159 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 197.2 ± 43 | 196.1 ± 36.2 | 0.838 |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 7.0 ± 0.4 | 7.0 ± 0.4 | 0.259 |
ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle index; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C‐reactive protein; HOMA IR, homoeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance.
Stepwise logistic regression analysis for low hand grip strength
| B | SE | Exp(B) | 95% CI |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| Endothelial dysfunction | 0.703 | 0.306 | 2.019 | 1.107 | 3.682 | 0.022 |
| Age (year) | 0.158 | 0.036 | 1.171 | 1.092 | 1.257 | <0.001 |
| Osteoporosis (yes/no) | 0.775 | 0.371 | 2.171 | 1.048 | 4.495 | 0.037 |
| Gait speed (≥0.8 m/s) | −0.841 | 0.331 | 0.431 | 0.226 | 0.825 | 0.011 |
CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Difference of endothelial function between the normal hand grip strength (HGS) group and low hand grip strength group.
Figure 3Correlation between hand grip strength and reactive hyperaemia index.