Literature DB >> 30080467

Encouraging Participation And Transparency In Biobank Research.

Kayte Spector-Bagdady1, Raymond G De Vries2, Michele G Gornick3, Andrew G Shuman4, Sharon Kardia5, Jodyn Platt6.   

Abstract

Medical biobanks often struggle to obtain sustainable funding. Commercialization of specimens is one solution, but disclosure of commercial interests to potential contributors can be dissuasive. Recent revisions to the federal human subjects research regulations will soon mandate such commercialization disclosure in some circumstances, which raises questions about implications for practice. In this nationally representative, probability-based survey sample of the US adult population, we found that 67 percent of participants agreed that clear notification of potential commercialization of biospecimens is warranted, but only 23 percent were comfortable with such use. Sixty-two percent believed that profits should be used only to support future research, and 41 percent supported sharing profits with the public. We also considered other factors related to disclosure in our analysis and argue for a "disclosure plus" standard: informing potential contributors that their biospecimens might be accessed by commercial organizations and explaining how profits would be used to both enhance transparency and facilitate contributors' altruistic motivations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Business Of Health; Ethical Issues; Legal/Regulatory Issues; Public Opinion; Research And Technology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30080467      PMCID: PMC6143362          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  27 in total

1.  Human tissue samples and ethics--attitudes of the general public in Sweden to biobank research.

Authors:  Tore Nilstun; Göran Hermerén
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

2.  The impact of commercialisation on public perceptions of stem cell research: exploring differences across the use of induced pluripotent cells, human and animal embryos.

Authors:  Christine R Critchley; Gordana Bruce; Matthew Farrugia
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  The challenge of sustaining a hospital-based biobank and core molecular laboratory: the Beaumont experience.

Authors:  George D Wilson; Kirsten D'Angelo; Barbara L Pruetz; Timothy J Geddes; Dianna M Larson; Jan Akervall
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Public Trust in Health Information Sharing: A Measure of System Trust.

Authors:  Jodyn E Platt; Peter D Jacobson; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Occupational injury in America: An analysis of risk factors using data from the General Social Survey (GSS).

Authors:  Todd D Smith; David M DeJoy
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2012-01-23

6.  What are your views on commercialization of tissues for research?

Authors:  Kathinka Evers; Joanna Stjernschantz Forsberg; James F Eliason
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 7.  "The Google of Healthcare": enabling the privatization of genetic bio/databanking.

Authors:  Kayte Spector-Bagdady
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Mistrust of health care organizations is associated with underutilization of health services.

Authors:  Thomas A LaVeist; Lydia A Isaac; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  We're not in it for the money-lay people's moral intuitions on commercial use of 'their' biobank.

Authors:  Kristin Solum Steinsbekk; Lars Oystein Ursin; John-Arne Skolbekken; Berge Solberg
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-05

10.  Understanding the Public's Reservations about Broad Consent and Study-By-Study Consent for Donations to a Biobank: Results of a National Survey.

Authors:  Raymond Gene De Vries; Tom Tomlinson; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Chris Krenz; Diana Haggerty; Kerry A Ryan; Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Enhancing Cooperation Between Academic Biobanks and Biomedical Industry: Better Mutual Understanding and New Collaborative Models Are Needed.

Authors:  Daniel Simeon-Dubach; Michael H Roehrl; Paul Hofman; Pascal Puchois
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Implications of Research Biopsies in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Sarah M Dermody; Andrew G Shuman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-08-31

3.  Biospecimens, Research Consent, and Distinguishing Cell Line Research.

Authors:  Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Holly Fernandez Lynch; J Chad Brenner; Andrew G Shuman
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Patient Preferences for Use of Archived Biospecimens from Oncology Trials When Adequacy of Informed Consent Is Unclear.

Authors:  Jeffrey Peppercorn; Eric Campbell; Steve Isakoff; Nora K Horick; Julia Rabin; Katharine Quain; Lecia V Sequist; Aditya Bardia; Deborah Collyar; Fay Hlubocky; Debra Mathews
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-09-06

5.  "My Research Is Their Business, but I'm Not Their Business": Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Commercialization of Precision Oncology Data.

Authors:  Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Chris D Krenz; Collin Brummel; J Chad Brenner; Carol R Bradford; Andrew G Shuman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  Genetic data partnerships: academic publications with privately owned or generated genetic data.

Authors:  Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Amanda Fakih; Chris Krenz; Erica E Marsh; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Translation and validation of the greek version of a questionnaire measuring patient views on participation in clinical trials.

Authors:  Dimitrios Karampatakis; Angeliki Kakavouti-Doudos; Panagiotis Oikonomidis; Polychronis Voultsos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Donors, authors, and owners: how is genomic citizen science addressing interests in research outputs?

Authors:  Christi J Guerrini; Meaganne Lewellyn; Mary A Majumder; Meredith Trejo; Isabel Canfield; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Improving Translation and Cultural Appropriateness of Spanish-Language Consent Materials for Biobanks.

Authors:  Kathleen M Brelsford; Ernesto Ruiz; Catherine M Hammack; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2019-09

10.  Public trust and global biobank networks.

Authors:  Lisa Dive; Christine Critchley; Margaret Otlowski; Paul Mason; Miriam Wiersma; Edwina Light; Cameron Stewart; Ian Kerridge; Wendy Lipworth
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.