| Literature DB >> 30080467 |
Kayte Spector-Bagdady1, Raymond G De Vries2, Michele G Gornick3, Andrew G Shuman4, Sharon Kardia5, Jodyn Platt6.
Abstract
Medical biobanks often struggle to obtain sustainable funding. Commercialization of specimens is one solution, but disclosure of commercial interests to potential contributors can be dissuasive. Recent revisions to the federal human subjects research regulations will soon mandate such commercialization disclosure in some circumstances, which raises questions about implications for practice. In this nationally representative, probability-based survey sample of the US adult population, we found that 67 percent of participants agreed that clear notification of potential commercialization of biospecimens is warranted, but only 23 percent were comfortable with such use. Sixty-two percent believed that profits should be used only to support future research, and 41 percent supported sharing profits with the public. We also considered other factors related to disclosure in our analysis and argue for a "disclosure plus" standard: informing potential contributors that their biospecimens might be accessed by commercial organizations and explaining how profits would be used to both enhance transparency and facilitate contributors' altruistic motivations.Entities:
Keywords: Business Of Health; Ethical Issues; Legal/Regulatory Issues; Public Opinion; Research And Technology
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30080467 PMCID: PMC6143362 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 6.301