Literature DB >> 30080029

Detecting Biothreat Agents: From Current Diagnostics to Developing Sensor Technologies.

Scott A Walper1, Guillermo Lasarte Aragonés1,2, Kim E Sapsford3, Carl W Brown1,2, Clare E Rowland1,4, Joyce C Breger1, Igor L Medintz1.   

Abstract

Although a fundamental understanding of the pathogenicity of most biothreat agents has been elucidated and available treatments have increased substantially over the past decades, they still represent a significant public health threat in this age of (bio)terrorism, indiscriminate warfare, pollution, climate change, unchecked population growth, and globalization. The key step to almost all prevention, protection, prophylaxis, post-exposure treatment, and mitigation of any bioagent is early detection. Here, we review available methods for detecting bioagents including pathogenic bacteria and viruses along with their toxins. An introduction placing this subject in the historical context of previous naturally occurring outbreaks and efforts to weaponize selected agents is first provided along with definitions and relevant considerations. An overview of the detection technologies that find use in this endeavor along with how they provide data or transduce signal within a sensing configuration follows. Current "gold" standards for biothreat detection/diagnostics along with a listing of relevant FDA approved in vitro diagnostic devices is then discussed to provide an overview of the current state of the art. Given the 2014 outbreak of Ebola virus in Western Africa and the recent 2016 spread of Zika virus in the Americas, discussion of what constitutes a public health emergency and how new in vitro diagnostic devices are authorized for emergency use in the U.S. are also included. The majority of the Review is then subdivided around the sensing of bacterial, viral, and toxin biothreats with each including an overview of the major agents in that class, a detailed cross-section of different sensing methods in development based on assay format or analytical technique, and some discussion of related microfluidic lab-on-a-chip/point-of-care devices. Finally, an outlook is given on how this field will develop from the perspective of the biosensing technology itself and the new emerging threats they may face.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ebola; FDA; assay; bacteria; biosensor; biothreat; diagnostic; pandemic; toxin; virus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30080029     DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.8b00420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Sens        ISSN: 2379-3694            Impact factor:   7.711


  22 in total

1.  Isomorphic Fluorescent Nucleosides Facilitate Real-Time Monitoring of RNA Depurination by Ribosome Inactivating Proteins.

Authors:  Deyuan Cong; Yao Li; Paul T Ludford; Yitzhak Tor
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.020

2.  An anti-BSA antibody-based immunochromatographic assay for chloramphenicol and aflatoxin M1 by using carboxy-modified CdSe/ZnS core-shell nanoparticles as label.

Authors:  Zhiwei Qie; Wenliang Yan; Zichen Gao; Wu Meng; Rui Xiao; Shengqi Wang
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.833

3.  Poly(indole-5-carboxylic acid)/reduced graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles/phage-based electrochemical biosensor for highly specific detection of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis.

Authors:  Qiaoli Yang; Sangsang Deng; Jingjing Xu; Umer Farooq; Taotao Yang; Wei Chen; Lei Zhou; Meiying Gao; Shenqi Wang
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.833

4.  Rapid Detection of Clostridium botulinum in Food Using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP).

Authors:  Yufei Chen; Hao Li; Liu Yang; Lei Wang; Ruyi Sun; Julia E S Shearer; Fengjie Sun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Imaging-based spectrometer-less optofluidic biosensors based on dielectric metasurfaces for detecting extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Yasaman Jahani; Eduardo R Arvelo; Filiz Yesilkoy; Kirill Koshelev; Chiara Cianciaruso; Michele De Palma; Yuri Kivshar; Hatice Altug
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  The Growing Development of DNA Nanostructures for Potential Healthcare-Related Applications.

Authors:  Divita Mathur; Igor L Medintz
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 11.092

Review 7.  DNA Microsystems for Biodiagnosis.

Authors:  Alana Torres Vidal; Igor L Medintz; Hieu Bui
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Multiplex Detection of Different Magnetic Beads Using Frequency Scanning in Magnetic Frequency Mixing Technique.

Authors:  Stefan Achtsnicht; Ali Mohammad Pourshahidi; Andreas Offenhäusser; Hans-Joachim Krause
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Seed-mediated Electrochemically Developed Au Nanostructures with Boosted Sensing Properties: An Implication for Non-enzymatic Glucose Detection.

Authors:  Hossein Siampour; Sara Abbasian; Ahmad Moshaii; Kobra Omidfar; Mosslim Sedghi; Hossein Naderi-Manesh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Optical Interrogation Techniques for Nanophotonic Biochemical Sensors.

Authors:  Filiz Yesilkoy
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.