Literature DB >> 30079636

Proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim shows similarity in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to reference pegfilgrastim in healthy subjects.

Roumen Nakov1, Sreekanth Gattu1, Jessie Wang2, Maria Velinova3, Gregor Schaffar1, Andrej Skerjanec4.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study aimed to demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of Sandoz proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) matches reference pegfilgrastim (Neulasta® ) in healthy subjects. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed.
METHODS: The phase I, randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study consisted of two treatment periods separated by an 8-week washout period. Healthy subjects aged 18-45 were randomized to either proposed biosimilar/reference pegfilgrastim or reference pegfilgrastim/proposed biosimilar. Proposed biosimilar and reference pegfilgrastim were administered on Day 1 of each treatment period (single 6 mg subcutaneous injection). Blood samples for PK/PD analysis were taken predose and ≤336 h postdose. PK/PD similarity was claimed if 90% (PK) and 95% (PD) confidence intervals (CI) for geometric mean ratios of the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time of dosing and extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf ), or to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-last ), maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax ), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) area under the effect curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration (AUEC0-last ) and ANC maximum effect attributable to the therapy under investigation (Emax ) were completely contained within the predefined margin (0.8 to 1.25).
RESULTS: Overall, 169 subjects completed the study. PK/PD similarity was demonstrated; 90% CIs of geometric mean ratio of proposed biosimilar/reference for PK: AUC0-inf (1.0559-1.2244), AUC0-last (1.0607-1.2328), Cmax (1.0312-1.1909) and 95% CIs for PD (ANC): AUEC0-last (0.9948-1.0366), Emax (0.9737-1.0169) were completely contained within predefined margin of 0.8 to 1.25. Both biologics had similar safety profiles, were well tolerated and had low incidence of anti-drug antibodies. No neutralizing or clinically relevant antibodies were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: PK/PD similarity of Sandoz proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim and reference pegfilgrastim was confirmed. No clinically meaningful differences in safety, tolerability and immunogenicity were observed in healthy subjects.
© 2018 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug development < phase I; oncology < chemotherapy; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30079636      PMCID: PMC6256001          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety of pegfilgrastim administered by two delivery methods: on-body injector and manual injection with a prefilled syringe.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Phuong Khanh Morrow; Xikun Wu; Michael Moxness; Desmond Padhi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Anna Kido
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) compared with reference pegfilgrastim in Asian patients with breast cancer: an exploratory comparison from two Phase III trials.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Pere Gascon; Clyde M Jones; Allen Nixon; Andriy Krendyukov; Roumen Nakov; Yuhan Li; Kimberly Blackwell
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.404

4.  Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  F A Holmes; S E Jones; J O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; T George; M Savin; D Richards; J Glaspy; L Meza; G Cohen; M Dhami; D R Budman; J Hackett; M Brassard; B B Yang; B C Liang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alena M Pfeil; Kim Allcott; Ruth Pettengell; Gunter von Minckwitz; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Zsolt Szabo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Human preleukemia: cellular, molecular and clinical aspects.

Authors:  H Mayani
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice.

Authors:  Derek Weycker; Xiaoyan Li; Rich Barron; Yanli Li; Maureen Reiner; Alex Kartashov; Jacqueline Figueredo; Spiros Tzivelekis; Jacob Garcia
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar LA-EP2006 and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (Supportive Care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment (PROTECT-2), a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

Authors:  Kimberly Blackwell; Roman Donskih; C Michael Jones; Allen Nixon; Maria J Vidal; Roumen Nakov; Pritibha Singh; Gregor Schaffar; Pere Gascón; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-04-18

9.  Randomized, double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Oleg Lipatov; Mona Frolova; Dmitry Udovitsa; Eldar Topuzov; Doina Elena Ganea-Motan; Roumen Nakov; Pritibha Singh; Anita Rudy; Kimberly Blackwell
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind trials comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer.

Authors:  K Blackwell; P Gascon; C M Jones; A Nixon; A Krendyukov; R Nakov; Y Li; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  6 in total

1.  Proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim shows similarity in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to reference pegfilgrastim in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Roumen Nakov; Sreekanth Gattu; Jessie Wang; Maria Velinova; Gregor Schaffar; Andrej Skerjanec
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of pegfilgrastim in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving ramucirumab plus docetaxel in Japan.

Authors:  Yu Kondo; Tomoya Tachi; Takayoshi Sakakibara; Jun Kato; Aki Kato; Takahito Mizuno; Yoshio Miyake; Hitomi Teramachi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Sensitivity of Pegfilgrastim Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Parameters to Product Differences in Similarity Studies.

Authors:  Ari Brekkan; Luis Lopez-Lazaro; Elodie L Plan; Joakim Nyberg; Suresh Kankanwadi; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  A large multicentre, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in healthy volunteers to compare pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of a pegfilgrastim biosimilar with its US- and EU-reference biologics.

Authors:  Anne Bellon; Jessie Wang; Andrej Skerjanec; Maria Velinova; Daniel Dickerson; Ahad Sabet; Ly Ngo; Terry O'Reilly; Charles Tomek; Steven Schussler; Stefanie Schier-Mumzhiu; Sreekanth Gattu; Sven D Koch; Celine Schelcher; Miryana Dobreva; Anca Boldea; Roumen Nakov; Gordon P Otto
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Meta-analysis of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Results of 3 Phase 1 Studies with Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  Sreekanth Gattu; Jessie Wang; Anne Bellon; Celine Schelcher; Roumen Nakov; Ramin Arani
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2021-08-04

6.  Is PEGylated G-CSF superior to G-CSF in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Huan Zheng; Man-Cheng Yu; Wei Wang; Xin-Hong Wu; Dong-Mei Yang; Juan Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.