Siddharth Singh1,2. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, 9452 Medical Center Drive, ACTRI 1W 501, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. sis040@ucsd.edu. 2. Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. sis040@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the first clinical trial of cortisone in ulcerative colitis in 1955, remarkable progress has been made in the design and conduct of clinical trials in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In this review article, we will discuss evolution of clinical trials in IBD over the last 3-5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: Recognizing limitations intrinsic to clinical disease activity indices in IBD, regulatory authorities have recommended evaluating co-primary endpoints of patient-reported outcomes and endoscopic disease activity in clinical trials. Biomarker-enriched trial enrolment and central endoscopy reading have emerged as critical events in trial recruitment and outcome assessment and have driven placebo response rates down. While trials of novel biologic therapies and advanced small molecules continue at an accelerated pace, pragmatic comparative efficacy trials of treatment strategy aimed at optimizing current therapies (such as early combined immunosuppression [REACT], tight disease control [CALM], therapeutic drug monitoring [TAXIT, TAILORIX]) have directly informed clinical practice. With emphasis on value-based care and population health management, multi-pronged remote monitoring, self-management, and telemedicine approaches in the era of smartphones have re-emerged with promise. Non-conventional therapies such as fecal microbiota transplantation, though still experimental, have provided insight into disease pathogenesis and offered hope for microbial manipulation strategies for treating these complex diseases. Clinical trials have rapidly evolved over the last 5 years not only focusing on novel therapies but also optimizing existing treatment approaches and population health management. Over the next decade, these trials will continue to advance the field, and be readily translatable into clinical practice.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the first clinical trial of cortisone in ulcerative colitis in 1955, remarkable progress has been made in the design and conduct of clinical trials in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In this review article, we will discuss evolution of clinical trials in IBD over the last 3-5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: Recognizing limitations intrinsic to clinical disease activity indices in IBD, regulatory authorities have recommended evaluating co-primary endpoints of patient-reported outcomes and endoscopic disease activity in clinical trials. Biomarker-enriched trial enrolment and central endoscopy reading have emerged as critical events in trial recruitment and outcome assessment and have driven placebo response rates down. While trials of novel biologic therapies and advanced small molecules continue at an accelerated pace, pragmatic comparative efficacy trials of treatment strategy aimed at optimizing current therapies (such as early combined immunosuppression [REACT], tight disease control [CALM], therapeutic drug monitoring [TAXIT, TAILORIX]) have directly informed clinical practice. With emphasis on value-based care and population health management, multi-pronged remote monitoring, self-management, and telemedicine approaches in the era of smartphones have re-emerged with promise. Non-conventional therapies such as fecal microbiota transplantation, though still experimental, have provided insight into disease pathogenesis and offered hope for microbial manipulation strategies for treating these complex diseases. Clinical trials have rapidly evolved over the last 5 years not only focusing on novel therapies but also optimizing existing treatment approaches and population health management. Over the next decade, these trials will continue to advance the field, and be readily translatable into clinical practice.
Authors: Geert D'Haens; Filip Baert; Gert van Assche; Philip Caenepeel; Philippe Vergauwe; Hans Tuynman; Martine De Vos; Sander van Deventer; Larry Stitt; Allan Donner; Severine Vermeire; Frank J Van De Mierop; Jean-Charles R Coche; Janneke van der Woude; Thomas Ochsenkühn; Ad A van Bodegraven; Philippe P Van Hootegem; Guy L Lambrecht; Fazia Mana; Paul Rutgeerts; Brian G Feagan; Daniel Hommes Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-02-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Simon P L Travis; Dan Schnell; Piotr Krzeski; Maria T Abreu; Douglas G Altman; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Brian G Feagan; Stephen B Hanauer; Gary R Lichtenstein; Philippe R Marteau; Walter Reinisch; Bruce E Sands; Bruce R Yacyshyn; Patrick Schnell; Christian A Bernhardt; Jean-Yves Mary; William J Sandborn Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Christopher Ma; Remo Panaccione; Richard N Fedorak; Claire E Parker; Tran M Nguyen; Reena Khanna; Corey A Siegel; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Geert D'Haens; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Vipul Jairath Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Jean-Frederic Colombel; Remo Panaccione; Peter Bossuyt; Milan Lukas; Filip Baert; Tomas Vaňásek; Ahmet Danalioglu; Gottfried Novacek; Alessandro Armuzzi; Xavier Hébuterne; Simon Travis; Silvio Danese; Walter Reinisch; William J Sandborn; Paul Rutgeerts; Daniel Hommes; Stefan Schreiber; Ezequiel Neimark; Bidan Huang; Qian Zhou; Paloma Mendez; Joel Petersson; Kori Wallace; Anne M Robinson; Roopal B Thakkar; Geert D'Haens Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nadia Mohammed Vashist; Mark Samaan; Mahmoud H Mosli; Claire E Parker; John K MacDonald; Sigrid A Nelson; G Y Zou; Brian G Feagan; Reena Khanna; Vipul Jairath Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-01-16
Authors: Reena Khanna; Brian Bressler; Barrett G Levesque; Guangyong Zou; Larry W Stitt; Gordon R Greenberg; Remo Panaccione; Alain Bitton; Pierre Paré; Séverine Vermeire; Geert D'Haens; Donald MacIntosh; William J Sandborn; Allan Donner; Margaret K Vandervoort; Joan C Morris; Brian G Feagan Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Konstantinos Papamichael; Ravy K Vajravelu; Byron P Vaughn; Mark T Osterman; Adam S Cheifetz Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 9.071