Literature DB >> 18295023

Early combined immunosuppression or conventional management in patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease: an open randomised trial.

Geert D'Haens1, Filip Baert2, Gert van Assche3, Philip Caenepeel4, Philippe Vergauwe5, Hans Tuynman6, Martine De Vos7, Sander van Deventer8, Larry Stitt9, Allan Donner10, Severine Vermeire3, Frank J Van De Mierop11, Jean-Charles R Coche12, Janneke van der Woude13, Thomas Ochsenkühn14, Ad A van Bodegraven15, Philippe P Van Hootegem16, Guy L Lambrecht17, Fazia Mana18, Paul Rutgeerts3, Brian G Feagan10, Daniel Hommes19.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most patients who have active Crohn's disease are treated initially with corticosteroids. Although this approach usually controls symptoms, many patients become resistant to or dependent on corticosteroids, and long exposure is associated with an increased risk of mortality. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of early use of combined immunosuppression with conventional management in patients with active Crohn's disease who had not previously received glucocorticoids, antimetabolites, or infliximab.
METHODS: We did a 2-year open-label randomised trial at 18 centres in Belgium, Holland, and Germany between May, 2001, and January, 2004. We randomly assigned 133 patients to either early combined immunosuppression or conventional treatment. The 67 patients assigned to combined immunosuppression received three infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg of bodyweight) at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with azathioprine. We gave additional treatment with infliximab and, if necessary, corticosteroids, to control disease activity. 66 patients assigned to conventional management received corticosteroids, followed, in sequence, by azathioprine and infliximab. The primary outcome measures were remission without corticosteroids and without bowel resection at weeks 26 and 52. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00554710.
FINDINGS: Four patients (two in each group) did not receive treatment as per protocol. At week 26, 39 (60.0%) of 65 patients in the combined immunosuppression group were in remission without corticosteroids and without surgical resection, compared with 23 (35.9%) of 64 controls, for an absolute difference of 24.1% (95% CI 7.3-40.8, p=0.0062). Corresponding rates at week 52 were 40/65 (61.5%) and 27/64 (42.2%) (absolute difference 19.3%, 95% CI 2.4-36.3, p=0.0278). 20 of the 65 patients (30.8%) in the early combined immunosuppression group had serious adverse events, compared with 19 of 64 (25.3%) controls (p=1.0).
INTERPRETATION: Combined immunosuppression was more effective than conventional management for induction of remission and reduction of corticosteroid use in patients who had been recently diagnosed with Crohn's disease. Initiation of more intensive treatment early in the course of the disease could result in better outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18295023     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60304-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  287 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of growth hormone in active pediatric Crohn disease.

Authors:  Lee A Denson; Mi-Ok Kim; Ramona Bezold; Rebecca Carey; Bankole Osuntokun; Cade Nylund; Tara Willson; Erin Bonkowski; Dandan Li; Edgar Ballard; Margaret Collins; M Susan Moyer; David J Klein
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.839

2.  What options do we have for induction therapy for Crohn's disease?

Authors:  Corey A Siegel
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.404

Review 3.  MRI in Crohn's disease--current and future clinical applications.

Authors:  Gionata Fiorino; Cristiana Bonifacio; Alberto Malesci; Luca Balzarini; Silvio Danese
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Current Controversies in Crohn's Disease: A Roundtable Discussion of the BRIDGe Group.

Authors:  Miles P Sparrow; Peter M Irving; Leonard Baidoo; Brian Bressler; Adam S Cheifetz; Shane M Devlin; Laura E Harrell; Jennifer Jones; Patricia L Kozuch; Gil Y Melmed; Fernando S Velayos; Corey A Siegel
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2008-10

5.  Efficacy of early treatment with infliximab in pediatric Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Jong Seung Lee; Jee Hyun Lee; Ji Hyuk Lee; Hye Jin Lee; Mi Jin Kim; Hae Jeong Lee; Yon Ho Choe
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Role of endoscopy in predicting the disease course in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Matthieu Allez; Marc Lémann
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Tailoring the treatment to the individual in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Edouard Louis; Jacques Belaiche; Catherine Reenaers
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  Optimal use of biologics in the management of Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Remo Panaccione; Subrata Ghosh
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.409

9.  Mortality Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case-Control Study of New York State Death Records.

Authors:  Angelica Nocerino; Alexandra Feathers; Elena Ivanina; Laura Durbin; Arun Swaminath
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Mucosal healing and deep remission: what does it mean?

Authors:  Gerhard Rogler; Stephan Vavricka; Alain Schoepfer; Peter L Lakatos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.