Literature DB >> 30074131

Pre-implantation genetic testing: decisional factors to accept or decline among in vitro fertilization patients.

Brandy Lamb1, Erin Johnson1, Leslie Francis1, Melinda Fagan1, Naomi Riches1, Isabella Canada1, Alena Wilson1, Amber Mathiesen1, Maya Sabatello2, Shawn Gurtcheff3, Erica Johnstone1, Erin Rothwell4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Embryo testing to improve pregnancy outcomes among individuals who are seeking assisted reproduction technologies is increasing. The purpose of this study was to assess decisional factors through in-depth interviews for why women would accept or decline preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with in vitro fertilization (IVF).
METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 37 women who were offered PGT-A with IVF during the summer 2017. Interviews lasted on average 40 min and were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a content analysis.
RESULTS: Results identified a number of decisional factors related to values about conception, disability, and pregnancy termination, past pregnancy experiences, optimism toward technology, and cost. Other key issues that were identified include the use of expanded carrier screening prior to IVF, maternal age, and limited education about PGT-A due to the complexity about education for IVF alone.
CONCLUSION: There is a need to develop decision support tools for the increasing choices of genetic testing options for patients seeking IVF. Including patients' values, past pregnancy experiences and attitudes toward science into the decision-making process may help promote a more informed decision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; In vitro fertilization (IVF); Interviews; Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS); Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30074131      PMCID: PMC6133803          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1278-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  23 in total

1.  Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study.

Authors:  Richard T Scott; Kathleen Ferry; Jing Su; Xin Tao; Katherine Scott; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an excellent tool, but not perfect: a guide to counseling patients considering PGS.

Authors:  Paul R Brezina; William H Kutteh; Amelia P Bailey; Raymond W Ke
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Counselling considerations for chromosomal mosaicism detected by preimplantation genetic screening.

Authors:  Andria G Besser; Emily L Mounts
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 5.  The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection.

Authors:  J C Harper; L Wilton; J Traeger-Synodinos; V Goossens; C Moutou; S B SenGupta; T Pehlivan Budak; P Renwick; M De Rycke; J P M Geraedts; G Harton
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 15.610

6.  Increased susceptibility to maternal aneuploidy demonstrated by comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human MII oocytes and first polar bodies.

Authors:  E Fragouli; D Wells; K M Whalley; J A Mills; M J W Faed; J D A Delhanty
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 7.  Use of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: clinical results.

Authors:  Carmen Rubio; Lorena Rodrigo; Pere Mir; Emilia Mateu; Vanessa Peinado; Miguel Milán; Nasser Al-Asmar; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Sandra Garcia; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates.

Authors:  E J Forman; X Tao; K M Ferry; D Taylor; N R Treff; R T Scott
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Preimplantation genetic screening: a practical guide.

Authors:  Paul R Brezina; Raymond W Ke; William H Kutteh
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2013-02-27

10.  Optimistic update bias holds firm: Three tests of robustness following Shah et al.

Authors:  Neil Garrett; Tali Sharot
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2016-11-09
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Does theFMR1 gene affect IVF success?

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Mindy S Christianson; Bailey McGuinness; Kamaria Cayton Vaught; Jacqueline Y Maher; William G Kearns
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Brandy Lamb; Erin Johnson; Shawn Gurtcheff; Naomi Riches; Melinda Fagan; Maya Sabatello; Erica Johnstone
Journal:  Ther Adv Reprod Health       Date:  2020-04-16

3.  Clinical utility of combined preimplantation genetic testing methods in couples at risk of passing on beta thalassemia/hemoglobin E disease: A retrospective review from a single center.

Authors:  Chonthicha Satirapod; Matchuporn Sukprasert; Bhakbhoom Panthan; Angkana Charoenyingwattana; Pawares Chitayanan; Wasun Chantratita; Wicharn Choktanasiri; Objoon Trachoo; Suradej Hongeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.