Literature DB >> 23394777

Use of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: clinical results.

Carmen Rubio1, Lorena Rodrigo, Pere Mir, Emilia Mateu, Vanessa Peinado, Miguel Milán, Nasser Al-Asmar, Inmaculada Campos-Galindo, Sandra Garcia, Carlos Simón.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening. Most methods of embryo viability assessment involve morphologic evaluation at different preimplantation developmental stages. A weak association between blastocyst morphology and aneuploidy has been described, supporting the basis for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for assessment of embryo viability. The expected improvement in reproductive outcome rates has been reached with the application of microarrays based on comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in clinical routine PGS.
DESIGN: Review of published studies and own unpublished data.
SETTING: University-affiliated private institution. PATIENT(S): IVF patients undergoing PGS at different stages. INTERVENTION(S): PGS with polar body, cleavage-stage, and blastocyst biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Aneuploidy, implantation, and pregnancy rates.
RESULTS: The clinical outcome after analysis of all 24 chromosomes improved pregnancy and implantation rates for different indications to a higher degree than the previously available technology, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), in which only a limited number of chromosomes could be analyzed. CONCLUSION(S): Most of the data regarding the controversy of day-3 biopsy come from FISH cycles, and the utility of day-3 biopsy with new array-CGH technology should be further evaluated through randomized controlled trials. The current trend is blastocyst biopsy with a fresh transfer or vitrification for transfer in a nonstimulated cycle.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23394777     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

1.  Confirmation rates of array-CGH in day-3 embryo and blastocyst biopsies for preimplantation genetic screening.

Authors:  P Mir; E Mateu; A Mercader; R Herrer; L Rodrigo; M Vera; V Peinado; M Milán-Sánchez; I Campos-Galindo; S García-Herrero; C Simón; C Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Live births after simultaneous avoidance of monogenic diseases and chromosome abnormality by next-generation sequencing with linkage analyses.

Authors:  Liying Yan; Lei Huang; Liya Xu; Jin Huang; Fei Ma; Xiaohui Zhu; Yaqiong Tang; Mingshan Liu; Ying Lian; Ping Liu; Rong Li; Sijia Lu; Fuchou Tang; Jie Qiao; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Freeze-all policy: is it time for that?

Authors:  Matheus Roque
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Pre-implantation genetic testing: decisional factors to accept or decline among in vitro fertilization patients.

Authors:  Brandy Lamb; Erin Johnson; Leslie Francis; Melinda Fagan; Naomi Riches; Isabella Canada; Alena Wilson; Amber Mathiesen; Maya Sabatello; Shawn Gurtcheff; Erica Johnstone; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Evaluation of the endometrial receptivity assay and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy in overcoming recurrent implantation failure.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzolino; Patricia Diaz-Gimeno; Antonio Pellicer; Nicolas Garrido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection?

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Can Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Technology Improve IVF/ICSI Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Minghao Chen; Shiyou Wei; Junyan Hu; Song Quan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Randomized comparison of next-generation sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization for preimplantation genetic screening: a pilot study.

Authors:  Zhihong Yang; James Lin; John Zhang; Wai Ieng Fong; Pei Li; Rong Zhao; Xiaohong Liu; William Podevin; Yanping Kuang; Jiaen Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Preimplantation genetic screening of blastocysts by multiplex qPCR followed by fresh embryo transfer: validation and verification.

Authors:  Yu-Shih Yang; Shun-Ping Chang; Hsin-Fu Chen; Gwo-Chin Ma; Wen-Hsiang Lin; Chi-Fang Lin; Feng-Po Tsai; Cheng-Hsuan Wu; Horng-Der Tsai; Tsung-Hsien Lee; Ming Chen
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Comparative genomic hybridization selection of blastocysts for repeated implantation failure treatment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Sara Bono; Alessandra Ruberti; Anna Maria Lobascio; Pierfrancesco Greco; Anil Biricik; Letizia Spizzichino; Alessia Greco; Jan Tesarik; Maria Giulia Minasi; Francesco Fiorentino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.