Literature DB >> 30073601

Evolution of a Novel Robotic Training Curriculum in a Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship.

L Mark Knab1, Mazen S Zenati1, Anton Khodakov1, Maryjoe Rice1, Amr Al-Abbas1, David L Bartlett1, Amer H Zureikat1, Herbert J Zeh2, Melissa E Hogg3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is increasingly being used for complex oncologic operations, although currently there is no standardized curriculum in place for surgical oncologists. We describe the evolution of a proficiency-based robotic training program implemented for surgical oncology fellows, and demonstrate the outcomes of the program.
METHODS: A 5-step robotic curriculum began integration in July 2013. Fellows from July 2013 to August 2017 were included. An education portfolio was created for each fellow, including pre-fellowship experience, fellowship experience with data from robotic curriculum and operative experience, and post-fellowship practice information.
RESULTS: Of 30 fellows, 20% completed a prior fellowship, 97% trained at an academic residency, 57% had prior robotic training (median 5 h), and 43% had performed robotic surgery (median 0 cases). In fellowship, on average, fellows spent 5 h on the virtual reality curriculum and performed 19 biotissue anastomoses. For total surgeries, fellows operating from the console increased over time (p = 0.005). For pancreas, the average percentage of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) steps completed increased (p < 0.011), as did the number of PDs in which the fellow completed the entire resection (p = 0.013). Fellows were 10 times more likely to complete the entire distal than PD from the console (p < 0.01). Post-fellowship, 83% of fellows obtained an academic position, 88% utilized robotics, and 91% performed pancreatic surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: With dedicated training, fellows can safely primarily perform complex gastrointestinal robotic surgeries and, after graduation, take jobs incorporating this skill set. In this era of scrutiny on cost and outcomes, specialized training programs offer a safe integration option for complex technical skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30073601     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6686-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  How I Do It: Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Gregory C Wilson; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  State of the art robotic distal pancreatectomy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Amr I Al Abbas; Herbert J Zeh Iii; Patricio M Polanco
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-29

3.  ASO Author Reflections: Optimizing End-of-Life Care for Patients Dying from Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel R Rice; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  National Trends in Robotic Pancreas Surgery.

Authors:  Richard S Hoehn; Ibrahim Nassour; Mohamed A Adam; Sharon Winters; Alessandro Paniccia; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Association of Mentorship and a Formal Robotic Proficiency Skills Curriculum With Subsequent Generations' Learning Curve and Safety for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  MaryJoe K Rice; Jacob C Hodges; Johanna Bellon; Jeffrey Borrebach; Amr I Al Abbas; Ahmad Hamad; L Mark Knab; A James Moser; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: trends in technique and training challenges.

Authors:  Catherine H Davis; Miral S Grandhi; Victor P Gazivoda; Alissa Greenbaum; Timothy J Kennedy; Russell C Langan; H Richard Alexander; Henry A Pitt; David A August
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Robot-Assisted Pancreatic Surgery: A Structured Approach to Standardization of a Program and of the Operation.

Authors:  Charlotte Friederieke Müller-Debus; Michael Thomaschewski; Markus Zimmermann; Ulrich F Wellner; Dirk Bausch; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-03-17

Review 8.  Robotic pancreas surgery: an overview of history and update on technique, outcomes, and financials.

Authors:  Hussein H Khachfe; Joseph R Habib; Salem Al Harthi; Amal Suhool; Ali H Hallal; Faek R Jamali
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-06

9.  Learning curve of three European centers in laparoscopic, hybrid laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Pavel Tyutyunnik; Sjors Klompmaker; Carlo Lombardo; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Francesca Menonna; Niccolò Napoli; Ulrich Wellner; Roman Izrailov; Magomet Baychorov; Mark G Besselink; Moh'd Abu Hilal; Abe Fingerhut; Ugo Boggi; Tobias Keck; Igor Khatkov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Formal robotic training diminishes the learning curve for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: Implications for new programs in complex robotic surgery.

Authors:  Carl R Schmidt; Britney R Harris; Kelsey A Musgrove; Pavan Rao; J Wallis Marsh; Alan A Thomay; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat; Brian A Boone
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.