Gregg C Fonarow1,2, Anthony C Keech3, Terje R Pedersen4, Robert P Giugliano5, Peter S Sever6, Peter Lindgren7, Ben van Hout8, Guillermo Villa9, Yi Qian10, Ransi Somaratne10, Marc S Sabatine5,11. 1. Division of Cardiology, Ronald Reagan University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center. 2. Associate Editor. 3. National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 4. Center for Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 5. TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 7. The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund and Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 8. ScHARR School for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England. 9. Economic Modeling CoE, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland. 10. Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California. 11. Deputy Editor.
Abstract
Importance: The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor evolocumab has been demonstrated to reduce the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. To our knowledge, long-term cost-effectiveness of this therapy has not been evaluated using clinical trial efficacy data. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease when added to standard background therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A Markov cohort state-transition model was used, integrating US population-specific demographics, risk factors, background therapy, and event rates along with trial-based event risk reduction. Costs, including price of drug, utilities, and transitional probabilities, were included from published sources. Exposures: Addition of evolocumab to standard background therapy including statins. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke and cardiovascular death, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and net value-based price. Results: In the base case, using US clinical practice patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of at least 70 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259) and an annual events rate of 6.4 per 100 patient-years, evolocumab was associated with increased cost and improved QALY: incremental cost, $105 398; incremental QALY, 0.39, with an ICER of $268 637 per QALY gained ($165 689 with discounted price of $10 311 based on mean rebate of 29% for branded pharmaceuticals). Sensitivity and scenario analyses demonstrated ICERs ranging from $100 193 to $488 642 per QALY, with ICER of $413 579 per QALY for trial patient characteristics and event rate of 4.2 per 100 patient-years ($270 192 with discounted price of $10 311) and $483 800 if no cardiovascular mortality reduction emerges. Evolocumab treatment exceeded $150 000 per QALY in most scenarios but would meet this threshold at an annual net price of $9669 ($6780 for the trial participants) or with the discounted net price of $10 311 in patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of at least 80 mg/dL. Conclusions and Relevance: At its current list price of $14 523, the addition of evolocumab to standard background therapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease exceeds generally accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds. To achieve an ICER of $150 000 per QALY, the annual net price would need to be substantially lower ($9669 for US clinical practice and $6780 for trial participants), or a higher-risk population would need to be treated.
Importance: The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor evolocumab has been demonstrated to reduce the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. To our knowledge, long-term cost-effectiveness of this therapy has not been evaluated using clinical trial efficacy data. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease when added to standard background therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A Markov cohort state-transition model was used, integrating US population-specific demographics, risk factors, background therapy, and event rates along with trial-based event risk reduction. Costs, including price of drug, utilities, and transitional probabilities, were included from published sources. Exposures: Addition of evolocumab to standard background therapy including statins. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke and cardiovascular death, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and net value-based price. Results: In the base case, using US clinical practice patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of at least 70 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259) and an annual events rate of 6.4 per 100 patient-years, evolocumab was associated with increased cost and improved QALY: incremental cost, $105 398; incremental QALY, 0.39, with an ICER of $268 637 per QALY gained ($165 689 with discounted price of $10 311 based on mean rebate of 29% for branded pharmaceuticals). Sensitivity and scenario analyses demonstrated ICERs ranging from $100 193 to $488 642 per QALY, with ICER of $413 579 per QALY for trial patient characteristics and event rate of 4.2 per 100 patient-years ($270 192 with discounted price of $10 311) and $483 800 if no cardiovascular mortality reduction emerges. Evolocumab treatment exceeded $150 000 per QALY in most scenarios but would meet this threshold at an annual net price of $9669 ($6780 for the trial participants) or with the discounted net price of $10 311 in patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of at least 80 mg/dL. Conclusions and Relevance: At its current list price of $14 523, the addition of evolocumab to standard background therapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease exceeds generally accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds. To achieve an ICER of $150 000 per QALY, the annual net price would need to be substantially lower ($9669 for US clinical practice and $6780 for trial participants), or a higher-risk population would need to be treated.
Authors: Jeffrey L Anderson; Paul A Heidenreich; Paul G Barnett; Mark A Creager; Gregg C Fonarow; Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan L Halperin; Mark A Hlatky; Alice K Jacobs; Daniel B Mark; Frederick A Masoudi; Eric D Peterson; Leslee J Shaw Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Peter P Toth; Mark Danese; Guillermo Villa; Yi Qian; Anne Beaubrun; Armando Lira; Jeroen P Jansen Journal: J Med Econ Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 2.448
Authors: Dhruv S Kazi; Andrew E Moran; Pamela G Coxson; Joanne Penko; Daniel A Ollendorf; Steven D Pearson; Jeffrey A Tice; David Guzman; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael J Koren; Marc S Sabatine; Robert P Giugliano; Gisle Langslet; Stephen D Wiviott; Helina Kassahun; Andrea Ruzza; Yuhui Ma; Ransi Somaratne; Frederick J Raal Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Jordan Fulcher; Rachel O'Connell; Merryn Voysey; Jonathan Emberson; Lisa Blackwell; Borislava Mihaylova; John Simes; Rory Collins; Adrienne Kirby; Helen Colhoun; Eugene Braunwald; John La Rosa; T R Pedersen; Andrew Tonkin; Barry Davis; Peter Sleight; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Colin Baigent; Anthony Keech Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C Baigent; L Blackwell; J Emberson; L E Holland; C Reith; N Bhala; R Peto; E H Barnes; A Keech; J Simes; R Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Brian A Ference; Jennifer G Robinson; Robert D Brook; Alberico L Catapano; M John Chapman; David R Neff; Szilard Voros; Robert P Giugliano; George Davey Smith; Sergio Fazio; Marc S Sabatine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas S G Sehested; Jenny Bjerre; Seul Ku; Andrew Chang; Alison Jahansouz; Douglas K Owens; Mark A Hlatky; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Marc S Sabatine; Stephen D Wiviott; KyungAh Im; Sabina A Murphy; Robert P Giugliano Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 14.676