| Literature DB >> 30072897 |
Junjie Liu1, Chun Yin2, Chenxi Liu1, Yuqing Tang1, Xinping Zhang1.
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an international problem. Emergence and spread of AMR are strongly associated with overuse or inappropriate use of antimicrobials. Antimicrobial stewardship ensures the appropriate use of antimicrobials, and is an effective approach to control AMR. This study aims to understand the relationship between medical staffing and antimicrobial stewardship performance in China.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial stewardship; dynamic model; fixed-effect model; medical staffing; panel data econometrics; production function
Year: 2018 PMID: 30072897 PMCID: PMC6060732 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Variable definitions and sources.
| (1) Methicillin resistance rate of | CHINET Surveillance Reports of Bacterial | |
| The number of infectious diseases physicians in hospitals per 100,000 populations | China's Statistics Yearbooks of Health and Family Planning | |
| The number of pharmacists physicians in hospitals per 100,000 populations | China's Statistics Yearbooks of Health and Family Planning | |
| The number of clinical microbiologists in hospitals per 100,000 populations | China's Statistics Yearbooks of Health and Family Planning | |
| The number of nurses in hospitals per 100,000 populations | China's Statistics Yearbooks of Health and Family Planning | |
| The number of hospital beds per 100,000 populations | China's Statistics Yearbooks of Health and Family Planning | |
| Time index ( | – | |
S. aureus refers to Staphylococcus aureus.
Figure 1Time series of average methicillin resistance rates of S. aureus and CoNS. Data sources: CHINET Surveillance Reports of Bacterial Resistance 2009–2016.
Summary statistics of the input variables.
| 0.908 | 0.336 | 0.508 | 2.426 | |
| 20.485 | 6.903 | 10.278 | 41.312 | |
| 0.430 | 0.157 | 0.211 | 0.952 | |
| 168.669 | 61.632 | 69.693 | 361.565 | |
| 363.814 | 88.514 | 181.708 | 546.711 |
Std. dev. refers to standard deviation.
Figure 2Linear relationships between medical staffing and methicillin resistance rates of S. aureus. The red line in each plot denotes the fitted line. (A) The linear relationship between the staffing of infectious diseases physicians and the methicillin resistance rate of S. aureus. (B) The linear relationship between the staffing of pharmacists and the methicillin resistance rate of S. aureus. (C) The linear relationship between the staffing of clinical microbiologists and the methicillin resistance rate of S. aureus. (D) The linear relationship between the staffing of nurses and the methicillin resistance rate of S. aureus.
Figure 3Linear relationships between medical staffing and methicillin resistance rates of CoNS. The red line in each plot denotes the fitted line. (A) The linear relationship between the staffing of infectious diseases physicians and the methicillin resistance rate of CoNS. (B) The linear relationship between the staffing of pharmacists and the methicillin resistance rate of CoNS. (C) The linear relationship between the staffing of clinical microbiologists and the methicillin resistance rate of CoNS. (D) The linear relationship between the staffing of nurses and the methicillin resistance rate of CoNS.
Relationship between medical staffing and methicillin resistance of S. aureus.
| ln | 0.307 | 0.287 | ||
| (0.254) | (0.270) | |||
| ln | 0.140 | |||
| (0.133) | ||||
| ln | −0.036 | −0.165 | −0.184 | −0.405 |
| (0.339) | (0.275) | (0.292) | (0.318) | |
| ln | −0.147 | −0.602 | −3.5 | 0.106 |
| (0.398) | (0.630) | (0.510) | (0.465) | |
| ln | −0.282 | −0.422 | −0.463 | −0.561 |
| (0.367) | (0.318) | (0.259) | (0.350) | |
| ln | 0.512 | −0.350 | 0.394 | 0.648 |
| (0.468) | (0.571) | (0.385) | (0.322) | |
| ln | −0.371 | 1.256 | 0.272 | 0.337 |
| (0.255) | (0.598) | (0.399) | (0.346) | |
| −0.084 | −0.074 | −0.088 | −0.105 | |
| (0.046) | (0.041) | (0.054) | (0.059) | |
| Constant | −0.677 | −4.699 | −4.158 | −6.096 |
| (3.47) | (3.084) | (3.237) | (2.947) | |
| No. obs. | 100 | 100 | 78 | 64 |
| 14.74 | 5.70 | |||
| Wald χ2 | 46.49 | 104.86 | ||
| Arellano-Bond test | ||||
| AR(1) ( | 0.039 | 0.009 | ||
| AR(2) ( | 0.029 | 0.360 | ||
| Sargan test ( | 0.436 | 0.168 | ||
Significance:
p < 0.01,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.10.
Robust standard errors in parentheses. Column (1) employs pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) model, while column (2) employs fixed–effect (FE) model. Column (3) and (4) employ dynamic models: Column (3) enrolls one lag of the dependent variable, while column (4) enrolls two lags. AR (1) and AR (2) examine the serial correlations of residuals in first and second differences, respectively.
Relationship between medical staffing and methicillin resistance of CoNS.
| ln | 0.055 | 0.009 | ||
| (0.086) | (0.133) | |||
| ln | −0.246 | |||
| (0.088) | ||||
| ln | −0.042 | 0.050 | −0.059 | 0.017 |
| (0.132) | (0.183) | (0.087) | (0.163) | |
| ln | 0.178 | 0.231 | 0.075 | 0.184 |
| (0.158) | (0.260) | (0.244) | (0.165) | |
| ln | −0.169 | −0.063 | −0.191 | −0.351 |
| (0.134) | (0.234) | (0.105) | (0.123) | |
| ln | −0.133 | 0.186 | 0.123 | 0.019 |
| (0.123) | (0.281) | (0.164) | (0.184) | |
| ln | 0.087 | −0.362 | −0.114 | 3.0 |
| (0.092) | (0.227) | (0.219) | (0.181) | |
| 0.007 | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.001 | |
| (0.013) | (0.018) | (0.011) | (0.010) | |
| Constant | −0.800 | 0.122 | −0.616 | −1.251 |
| (1.301) | (1.569) | (1.055) | (0.754) | |
| No. obs. | 100 | 100 | 78 | 64 |
| 6.56 | 13.60 | |||
| Wald χ2 | 45.04 | 86.00 | ||
| Arellano-Bond test | ||||
| AR(1) ( | 0.066 | 0.011 | ||
| AR(2) ( | 0.261 | 0.582 | ||
| Sargan test ( | 0.968 | 0.875 | ||
Significance:
p < 0.01,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.10.
Robust standard errors in parentheses. Column (1) employs pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) model, while column (2) employs fixed-effect (FE) model. Column (3) and (4) employ dynamic models: Column (3) enrolls one lag of the dependent variable, while column (4) enrolls two lags. AR (1) and AR (2) examine the serial correlations of residuals in first and second differences, respectively.