Literature DB >> 30069848

Variations in the endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) may actually represent test error.

Michael H Dahan1, Seang Lin Tan2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 30069848      PMCID： PMC6150883          DOI： 10.1007/s10815-018-1279-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN： 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Inter-cycle consistency versus test compliance in endometrial receptivity analysis test.

Authors:  Tiffany Stankewicz; Diana Valbuena; Maria Ruiz-Alonso
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Intra-patient variability in the endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) test.

Authors:  Kristy Cho; SeangLin Tan; William Buckett; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Patricia Díaz-Gimeno; Maria Ruiz-Alonso; David Blesa; Nuria Bosch; José A Martínez-Conejero; Pilar Alamá; Nicolás Garrido; Antonio Pellicer; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 7.329
  3 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  15 years of transcriptomic analysis on endometrial receptivity: what have we learnt?

Authors:  Soumaya Messaoudi; Imane El Kasmi; Amelie Bourdiec; Kimberley Crespo; Laurence Bissonnette; Cecile Le Saint; François Bissonnette; Isaac-Jacques Kadoch
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2019-08-05

2.  Transcriptomic analysis of human endometrial stromal cells during early embryo invasion.

Authors:  Shuo Han; Minghui Liu; Shan Liu; Yuan Li
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.