Literature DB >> 29380278

Intra-patient variability in the endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) test.

Kristy Cho1, SeangLin Tan2,3, William Buckett2, Michael H Dahan4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29380278      PMCID： PMC5984876          DOI： 10.1007/s10815-018-1125-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN： 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Implantation failure of endometrial origin: it is not pathology, but our failure to synchronize the developing embryo with a receptive endometrium.

Authors:  Cecilia T Valdes; Amy Schutt; Carlos Simon
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Local and systemic factors and implantation: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Chelsea Fox; Scott Morin; Jae-Wook Jeong; Richard T Scott; Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Detection of the smaller window of maximal receptivity: timing isn't everything.

Authors:  Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Patricia Díaz-Gimeno; Maria Ruiz-Alonso; David Blesa; Nuria Bosch; José A Martínez-Conejero; Pilar Alamá; Nicolás Garrido; Antonio Pellicer; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Recurrent implantation failure: the role of the endometrium.

Authors:  Tanya Timeva; Atanas Shterev; Stanimir Kyurkchiev
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2014-10
  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Inter-cycle consistency versus test compliance in endometrial receptivity analysis test.

Authors:  Tiffany Stankewicz; Diana Valbuena; Maria Ruiz-Alonso
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Variations in the endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) may actually represent test error.

Authors:  Michael H Dahan; Seang Lin Tan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  15 years of transcriptomic analysis on endometrial receptivity: what have we learnt?

Authors:  Soumaya Messaoudi; Imane El Kasmi; Amelie Bourdiec; Kimberley Crespo; Laurence Bissonnette; Cecile Le Saint; François Bissonnette; Isaac-Jacques Kadoch
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2019-08-05

4.  Customized Frozen Embryo Transfer after Identification of the Receptivity Window with a Transcriptomic Approach Improves the Implantation and Live Birth Rates in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure.

Authors:  Delphine Haouzi; Frida Entezami; Antoine Torre; Charlène Innocenti; Yannick Antoine; Charlotte Mauries; Claire Vincens; Sophie Bringer-Deutsch; Anna Gala; Alice Ferrieres-Hoa; Jeanine Ohl; Beatriz Gonzalez Marti; Sophie Brouillet; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Transcriptomic analysis of human endometrial stromal cells during early embryo invasion.

Authors:  Shuo Han; Minghui Liu; Shan Liu; Yuan Li
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.