Literature DB >> 30069535

The K-line in the cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament is different on plain radiographs and CT images.

Yasushi Ijima1, Takeo Furuya1, Mitsutoshi Ota1, Satoshi Maki1, Junya Saito1, Mitsuhiro Kitamura1, Takuya Miyamoto1, Seiji Ohtori1, Sumihisa Orita1, Kazuhide Inage1, Takane Suzuki2, Masashi Yamazaki3, Masao Koda1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The K-line, which is a virtual line between the midpoints of the antero-posterior canal diameter at C2 and C7, can be useful for determination of surgical procedures for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Although K-line is originally measured with plain radiogram, computed tomography multiplanar reconstruction (CT-MPR) is applied for K-line measurement by several surgeons. The purpose of the present study was to analyze whether there is a difference in K-lines obtained from radiographs of standing patients and those obtained from CT-MPR images of supine patients.
METHODS: The present study included 65 patients with cervical OPLL underwent surgical treatment. We investigated the K-line (+ or -) before surgery, measured from lateral cervical spine radiographs taken in standing patients in a neutral position (X-P-based K-line) and CT-MPR mid-sagittal images obtained in supine patients (CT-based K-line). The X-P-based and CT-based K-lines were compared and differences between them were assessed.
RESULTS: The-X-P-based K-line was found to be (+) in 35 patients and (-) in 30 patients. Four of 35 patients with an X-P-based K-line (11%) showed a change from K-line (+) to (-) in CT-based K-line measurements. One of 30 patients with an X-P-based K-line (3%) showed a change from (-) to (+) in CT-based measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The K-line should be measured with plain radiogram of standing patients because X-P-based K-line and CT-based K-line can be different.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT images; K-line; cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30069535      PMCID: PMC6046332          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.05.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  19 in total

1.  Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Eun-Seok Son; Eun-Min Seo; Kyung-Soo Suk; Ki-Tack Kim
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with an occupying ratio of 60% or more.

Authors:  Takahito Fujimori; Motoki Iwasaki; Shinya Okuda; Shota Takenaka; Masafumi Kashii; Takashi Kaito; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Posterior movement and enlargement of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  I Aita; K Hayashi; Y Wadano; T Yabuki
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

4.  Is it possible to evaluate the parameters of cervical sagittal alignment on cervical computed tomographic scans?

Authors:  Hyo Sub Jun; In Bok Chang; Joon Ho Song; Tae Hwan Kim; Moon Soo Park; Seok Woo Kim; Jae Keun Oh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Masao Koda; Makondo Mochizuki; Hiroaki Konishi; Atsuomi Aiba; Ryo Kadota; Taigo Inada; Koshiro Kamiya; Mitsutoshi Ota; Satoshi Maki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Chikato Mannoji; Takeo Furuya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine (OPLL). The Investigation Committee on OPLL of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1981-04

Review 7.  Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: pathogenesis, management, and current surgical approaches. A review.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Colin C Buchanan; Dan Raphael; Larry T Khoo
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Toshikazu Tani; Takahiro Ushida; Kenji Ishida; Hiroyuki Iai; Takamasa Noguchi; Hiroshi Yamamoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kenichiro Sakai; Atsushi Okawa; Makoto Takahashi; Yoshiyasu Arai; Shigenori Kawabata; Mitsuhiro Enomoto; Tsuyoshi Kato; Takashi Hirai; Kenichi Shinomiya
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Morphologic limitations of posterior decompression by midsagittal splitting method for myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine.

Authors:  A Yamazaki; T Homma; S Uchiyama; Y Katsumi; H Okumura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Surgical Approaches and Associated Complications.

Authors:  Jeffery Head; George Rymarczuk; Geoffrey Stricsek; Lohit Velagapudi; Christopher Maulucci; Christian Hoelscher; James Harrop
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

2.  Influence of K-line on intraoperative and hidden blood loss in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament when undergoing unilateral open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yipeng Li; Jia Li; Feng Wang; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 3.  Surgical decision-making for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament versus other types of degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approaches.

Authors:  Suzanna Sum Sum Kwok; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Classification of expert-level therapeutic decisions for degenerative cervical myelopathy using ensemble machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Dougho Park; Jae Man Cho; Joong Won Yang; Donghoon Yang; Mansu Kim; Gayeoul Oh; Heum Dai Kwon
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-06

5.  Posterior Decompression and Fusion with Vertical Pressure Procedure in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical OPLL with Kyphotic Deformity.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Yunli Mei; Lei Li; Zeqing Li; Shuai Huang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.