STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the long-term outcomes of laminoplasty versus anterior decompression and fusion in the treatment of cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and to ascertain what factors should be considered in selecting appropriate surgical procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are little data about long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to OPLL with an occupying ratio 60% or more. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 27 patients having OPLL with an occupying ratio 60% or more and a follow-up period of at least 2 years. Clinical outcome was evaluated using Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores and recovery rates (≥75%, excellent; 50%-74%, good; 25%-50%, fair; and <25%, poor). RESULTS: The mean age and the mean duration of follow-up were 57 years and 10.2 years. The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was 9.3 before surgery and 12.4 at the final follow-up examination. There were 15 patients in the laminoplasty group (LAM group) and 12 patients in the anterior decompression and fusion group (ADF group). The ADF group had a significantly better recovery rate at final evaluation (53% vs. 30%; P = 0.04), a longer duration of surgery (314 vs. 128 min; P < 0.01), and greater blood loss (600 vs. 240 mL; P < 0.01) than did the LAM group. In the LAM group, 4 patients with excellent or good results had a significantly larger degree of cervical lordosis (30°vs. 10°; P = 0.002) than others. CONCLUSION: The ADF group had a significantly better recovery rate than the LAM group, although the degree of surgical invasiveness was high. ADF is generally recommended for OPLL with an occupying ratio 60% or more. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the long-term outcomes of laminoplasty versus anterior decompression and fusion in the treatment of cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and to ascertain what factors should be considered in selecting appropriate surgical procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are little data about long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to OPLL with an occupying ratio 60% or more. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 27 patients having OPLL with an occupying ratio 60% or more and a follow-up period of at least 2 years. Clinical outcome was evaluated using Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores and recovery rates (≥75%, excellent; 50%-74%, good; 25%-50%, fair; and <25%, poor). RESULTS: The mean age and the mean duration of follow-up were 57 years and 10.2 years. The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was 9.3 before surgery and 12.4 at the final follow-up examination. There were 15 patients in the laminoplasty group (LAM group) and 12 patients in the anterior decompression and fusion group (ADF group). The ADF group had a significantly better recovery rate at final evaluation (53% vs. 30%; P = 0.04), a longer duration of surgery (314 vs. 128 min; P < 0.01), and greater blood loss (600 vs. 240 mL; P < 0.01) than did the LAM group. In the LAM group, 4 patients with excellent or good results had a significantly larger degree of cervical lordosis (30°vs. 10°; P = 0.002) than others. CONCLUSION: The ADF group had a significantly better recovery rate than the LAM group, although the degree of surgical invasiveness was high. ADF is generally recommended for OPLL with an occupying ratio 60% or more. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.