Literature DB >> 30069376

Continuous 389 cases of Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: experience in Shanghai Chest Hospital.

Jia Huang1, Jiantao Li1, Hanyue Li1, Hao Lin1, Peiji Lu1, Qingquan Luo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze the perioperative indexes of 389 patients with non-small cell lung cancer in single center after robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) lobectomy, and to summarize the surgical key points in robotic lobectomy.
METHODS: The clinical data of 389 stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent RATS lobectomy from May 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 261 females (67.1%) and 128 males (32.9%); aged from 20-76 years old, with a mean age of 55.01 years; with ASA I in 106 cases, ASA II in 267 cases and ASA III in 16 cases; with BMI from 16.87-34.05, averaged at 23.09±2.79. The largest tumor in preoperative chest CT measurement was 0.3-3.0 cm, ranging from 1.29±0.59 cm; with stage Ia in 153 cases, stage Ib in 148 cases, stage Ic in 32 cases, stage IIb in 26 cases and stage IIIa in 30 cases; including 380 adenocarcinomas and 9 squamous carcinomas.
RESULTS: The operating time was 46-300 min, averaged at 91.51±30.80 min; with a blood loss of 0-100 mL in 371 cases (95.80%), 101-400 mL in 12 cases (3.60%) and >400 mL in 2 cases (0.60%); there were 4 (1.2%) conversions to thoracotomy, in which 2 patients had massive hemorrhage and 2 patients had extensive dense adhesion; there was no mortality during operation and perioperatively. The drainage on the first day after operation was 0-960 mL, averaged at 231.39±141.87 mL; the postoperative chest tube was placed for 2-12 d, averaged at 3.96±1.52 d; the postoperative hospital stay was 2-12 d, averaged at 4.96±1.51 d, with postoperative hospital stay >7 d in 12 cases (3.60%). The postoperative air leakage was the main reason (35 cases, 9%) for prolonged hospital stay, and there was no re-admitted case within 30 days. All the patients underwent systemic lymph node dissection. The total cost of hospitalization was 60,389.66-134,401.65 CNY, averaged at 93,809.23±13,371.26 CNY.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of Da Vinci robot surgery system in resectable non-small cell lung cancer is safe and effective, and could make up for the deficiencies of traditional thoracoscopic surgery. The number and level of robot surgery in our center have reached international advanced level, but the relatively expensive cost has become a major limitation in limiting its widespread use. With continuous improvements in robotic technology, its scope of application will be wider, which will inevitably bring new insights in lung surgical technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Da Vinci robot surgery system; lobectomy; minimally invasive surgery

Year:  2018        PMID: 30069376      PMCID: PMC6051870          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.06.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  25 in total

1.  Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tewari; James Peabody; Richard Sarle; Guruswami Balakrishnan; Ashok Hemal; Alok Shrivastava; Mani Menon
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill.

Authors:  L Chang; R M Satava; C A Pellegrini; M N Sinanan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy.

Authors:  Bernard J Park; Raja M Flores
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

4.  Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: a single-institution case series matching study.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Jang; Hyun-Sung Lee; Seong Yong Park; Jae Ill Zo
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2011-09

5.  Video robotic lobectomy.

Authors:  Franca M A Melfi; Marcello C Ambrogi; Marco Lucchi; Alfredo Mussi
Journal:  Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-01-01

6.  Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure.

Authors:  I Nagahiro; A Andou; M Aoe; Y Sano; H Date; N Shimizu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  VATS is an adequate oncological operation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Thomas; C Doddoli; S Yena; X Thirion; F Sebag; P Fuentes; R Giudicelli
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  J Bodner; H Wykypiel; G Wetscher; T Schmid
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Marta Angelini; Fabio Sbrana; Simone Cecconi; Tommaso Balestracci; Giuseppe Caravaglios
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

10.  Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Farid Gharagozloo; Marc Margolis; Barbara Tempesta; Eric Strother; Farzad Najam
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  6 in total

1.  Current status of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Masato Kanzaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Outcomes and quality of life after Robot-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: both three-port procedures performed by a single surgeon.

Authors:  Liang Zheng; Peng Song; Yanru Jiang; Xiao Fan; Chen Yang; Lei Zhang; Qianyun Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy with lung cancer in a patient with situs inversus totalis.

Authors:  Chen Yang; Wenjian Jin; Xiao Fan; Liang Zheng; Hui Wang; Qianyun Wang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Propensity score-matched comparison of robotic- and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 75 years or older.

Authors:  Hanbo Pan; Zenan Gu; Yu Tian; Long Jiang; Hongda Zhu; Junwei Ning; Jia Huang; Qingquan Luo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  [Robot-assisted Lobectomy under Port-only Mode with Artificial Pneumothorax].

Authors:  Lianmin Zhang; Xiaoliang Zhao; Feng Xu; Yu Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Jian You
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-20

6.  Report on 153 sequential three-incision robotic-assisted pulmonary resections by a single surgeon: technical details and learning curve.

Authors:  Muyun Peng; Xiang Wang; Chen Chen; Sichuang Tan; Wenliang Liu; Fenglei Yu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.