| Literature DB >> 30069261 |
Sonia E Fosch1,2, Cecilia A Ficoseco3, Antonella Marchesi3, Silvina Cocucci4, Maria E F Nader-Macias3, Beatriz E Perazzi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The vaginal microbiome is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including contraceptive methods. AIM: To evaluate the effect of contraceptive methods on vaginal microbiota and to compare MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rDNA sequencing for lactobacilli identification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and one (101) women consulting for birth control were included in a prospective study. Their vaginal content was sampled and analyzed once before they started using the contraceptive method of their choice, and twice after the initiation of contraception, at three months (94/101 women attended) and at six months (89/101 women attended). The relative frequencies of yeasts and trichomonas were analyzed. MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rDNA sequence analysis were applied for the identification of lactobacilli in their vaginal microbiota. The following contraceptive methods were assessed: Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill (COCP), Condom (CON) and The Rhythm Method (RHYT). McNemar's statistical test was applied.Entities:
Keywords: Basic vaginal states; Contraception; Immune activation; Lactobacilli; Probiotic; Vaginal microbiota
Year: 2018 PMID: 30069261 PMCID: PMC6047200 DOI: 10.2174/1874285801812010218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Microbiol J ISSN: 1874-2858
Criteria for the definition of the basic vaginal states (BVSs).
| 0 to 3 | No | |
| 0 to 3 | Yes | |
| 4 to 6 | No | |
|
| 7 to 10 | No |
| 4 to 10 | Yes |
BVSs: Basic Vaginal States; NV: Numerical Value (Nugent Criteria); VIR: Vaginal Inflammatory Reaction.
Evaluation of three months of contraception: Distribution of basic vaginal states (BVSs) according to the contraception method.
| I normal microbiota | 41 | I = 34 | I = 2 | I = 5 | ||
| I = 2 | II = 2 | I = 1 | ||||
| - | ||||||
| - | IV = 1 | |||||
| V = 1 | - | |||||
| - | ||||||
1BVSs: Basic Vaginal States - COCP: Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill (levonorgestrel-ethinylestradiol) - CON: Condom - RHYT: Rhythm Method -*Metronidazole Treatment.
Evaluation of six months of contraception: Distribution of basic vaginal states (BVSs) according to the contraception method.
| I = 33 | I = 2 | I = 4 | ||||
| I = 6 | II = 1 | I = 1 | ||||
| - | ||||||
| IV = 1 | ||||||
| V = 1 | - | |||||
| - | ||||||
BVSs: Basic Vaginal States - COCP: Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill (levonorgestrel-ethinylestradiol) - CON: Condom - RHYT: Rhythm Method -*Metronidazole Treatment
Distribution of yeasts associated with basic vaginal states (BVSs) at 3 and 6 months after the initiation of COCP.
| Initial Study (n) | After 3 Months ( | Initial Study (n) | After 6 Months (n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 8 | 9 | 5 | |
| 9 | 13 | 6 | 7 | |
| 1 | - | - | - | |
| 2 | - | 2 | - | |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | - | |
| 22 | 12 | |||
1BVSs: Basic Vaginal States 2COCP: Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill (Levonorgestrel-Ethinylestradiol) *Treated with antifungals **Undetected at the beginning of contraceptive method used
Degree of agreement in the identification of lactobacilli with MALDI-TOF MS and Rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting.
| - | - | - | - | |||
| 1 | 5 | - | - | |||
| - | - | - | - | |||
| - | - | - | - | |||
| - | - | - | - | |||