Yi Zheng1, Yong Zhang1, Yichun Zheng1, Nan Zhang1. 1. Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou 310009, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury, which is caused by renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), occurs in several clinical situations and causes severe renal damage. There is no effective therapeutic agent available for renal IRI at present. In this study, we performed an experiment based on an in vivo murine model of renal IRI to examine the effect of carnosol. Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three groups (10 rats in each group): the sham, IRI, and carnosol groups. Rats in the carnosol group were injected intravenously with 3 mg/kg of carnosol, and those in the sham and IRI groups were injected intravenously with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide 1 h before ischemia. Rats were sacrificed after 24 h of reperfusion. The blood and kidneys were harvested, renal function was assessed, and histologic evaluation was performed to analyze renal injury. A renal myeloperoxidase activity assay, in-situ apoptosis examination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunohistochemical assay, and western blot were also performed. Carnosol pretreatment significantly reduced renal dysfunction and histologic damage induced by renal IRI. Carnosol pretreatment suppressed renal inflammatory cell infiltration and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. In addition, carnosol markedly inhibited apoptotic tubular cell death, caspase-3 activation, and activation of the p38 pathway. Carnosol pretreatment protects rats against renal IRI by inhibiting inflammation and apoptosis. Although future investigation is needed, carnosol may be a potential therapeutic agent for preventing renal IRI.
Acute kidney injury, which is caused by renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), occurs in several clinical situations and causes severe renal damage. There is no effective therapeutic agent available for renal IRI at present. In this study, we performed an experiment based on an in vivo murine model of renal IRI to examine the effect of carnosol. Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three groups (10 rats in each group): the sham, IRI, and carnosol groups. Rats in the carnosol group were injected intravenously with 3 mg/kg of carnosol, and those in the sham and IRI groups were injected intravenously with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide 1 h before ischemia. Rats were sacrificed after 24 h of reperfusion. The blood and kidneys were harvested, renal function was assessed, and histologic evaluation was performed to analyze renal injury. A renal myeloperoxidase activity assay, in-situ apoptosis examination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunohistochemical assay, and western blot were also performed. Carnosol pretreatment significantly reduced renal dysfunction and histologic damage induced by renal IRI. Carnosol pretreatment suppressed renal inflammatory cell infiltration and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. In addition, carnosol markedly inhibited apoptotic tubular cell death, caspase-3 activation, and activation of the p38 pathway. Carnosol pretreatment protects rats against renal IRI by inhibiting inflammation and apoptosis. Although future investigation is needed, carnosol may be a potential therapeutic agent for preventing renal IRI.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) has frequently
been reported by urologists and nephrologists in many clinical situations in the last 2
decades. Nowadays, AKI has become a big problem for both urologists and nephrologists, since
it has prolonged the time of hospital stays, reduced the survival rates, and increased the
cost of patient cares [3, 15, 28]. Scientists have taken
great effort to examine the effect of diverse agents on AKI. However, to our knowledge,
there is no effective therapeutic agent available for AKI at present [1, 22]. In consideration of the
high accidence of renal IRI in urologic surgeries and renal transplantation, new therapeutic
agents are urgently needed to attenuate organ damage induced by AKI.Recently, a series of natural products obtained from plants or traditional Chinese
medicines have been used to prevent renal IRI in diverse experimental studies [8, 17, 32]. The mechanisms of renal IRI are known to be related
to renal inflammation, oxidative stress, and tubular cell necrosis and/or apoptosis [6, 15, 22]. Thus, natural products that possess
anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, or antioxidative activities are worth being examined as
potential therapeutic agents in experimental AKI studies. Carnosol (Fig. 1), which is a phenolic diterpene extracted from several dietary herbs, including
rosemary, has been reported to possess anticancer activity in a series of studies [11, 24]. Recent
reports demonstrated that carnosol may have significant anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory
effects and may protect diverse organs against IRI [18, 25, 31]. Yao et al. [30]
reported that carnosol attenuated intestinal IRI-induced hepatic damage through the
attenuation of inflammatory mediator production. Tian et al. [27] reported that carnosol markedly ameliorated lung
injury induced by intestinal IRI, by inhibiting inflammatory cell infiltration in lung
tissues. Therefore, we hypothesized that carnosol may provide a protective effect against
renal IRI through its anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic activities. To examine our
hypothesis, we performed an experiment based on an in vivo murine model of
renal IRI to investigate the potential effect and mechanisms of carnosol.
Fig. 1.
Chemical structure of carnosol. Carnosol is a phenolic diterpene extracted from
several dietary herbs, including rosemary. Its molecular formula is
C20H26O4. The formula weight is 330.4.
Chemical structure of carnosol. Carnosol is a phenolic diterpene extracted from
several dietary herbs, including rosemary. Its molecular formula is
C20H26O4. The formula weight is 330.4.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
Carnosol was purchased from the Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Anti-cleaved
caspase-3 antibody (rabbit anti-rat) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology
(1:3,000; Beverly, MA, USA). Anti-ED-1 antibody was purchased from AbD Serotec (1:25;
Oxford, UK ). The rabbit polyclonal anti-ratp38 or phosphorylated-p38 antibodies were
purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (1:1,000; Beverly, MA, USA).
Animals and experimental protocol
All experimental procedures were performed according to the National Institutes of Health
(NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) guidelines for the use of laboratory animals and approved by the
Ethics Committee of Experimental Animals of Zhejiang University (No. SYXK-2015-0010).
Thirty male Sprague Dawley rats (200–260 g) with a mean age of 6 weeks were given free
access to rodent diet and water. Rats were randomly assigned to three groups: the sham
group (Sham, n=10), IRI group (IRI, n=10), and carnosol group (Car, n=10). Rats in the
carnosol group were injected intravenously with 3 mg/kg of carnosol, and those in the sham
and IRI groups were injected intravenously with 3 mg/kg of 10% dimethyl sulfoxide 1 h
before renal ischemia. The dose and route of carnosol in this study were chosen based on
previous reports and a preliminary study we conducted [27, 30].
Renal IRI model
The renal IRI model was previously described [5].
In brief, rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium
(45 mg/kg). A midline abdominal incision was made, followed by right nephrectomy. The left
renal artery was occluded with a nontraumatic microvascular clamp for 45 min, followed by
reperfusion for 24 h. Rats in the sham group underwent the same procedure without clamping
the left renal artery. During the experiment, we used a heating pad to maintain the body
temperature of rats between 36 and 37°C. Rats were then sacrificed 24 h after reperfusion,
and the blood and left kidney were collected for analysis.
Renal function assessment
We examined serum creatinine (Scr) and blood ureanitrogen (BUN) levels to evaluate renal
function. The samples were measured using an Olympus analyzer (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Renal histologic evaluation
Kidney tissues were fixed using 4% buffered paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin.
Tissue sections (4 µm in thickness) were stained with hematoxylin and
eosin (H&E) for routine histopathologic examination. Semiquantitative evaluation of
tissue damage was performed by a pathologist in a blind manner, based on previously
described criteria [16, 20]. Ten randomly selected high-power fields (magnification, ×400) per
section were evaluated and scored. The total histologic score for each section was
calculated by adding all the scores.
Renal myeloperoxidase activity assessment
Renal myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity is known as a marker of inflammatory cell
infiltration [5]. Thus, we examined it using a
commercial assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) as
previously described [8].
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Kidney tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) levels were measured
using ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the instructions of
the manufacturer.
Apoptosis assessment
Apoptosis in the kidneys was examined using a terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay with a commercial kit (Roche
Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) based on the manufacturer’s guidelines. The number of
apoptotic cells was counted in ten randomly selected high-power fields (magnification,
×400) per section in a blinded manner.
Immunohistochemical analysis
We used paraffin-embedded renal tissue sections to perform the immunohistochemical
analysis. Briefly, 4-µm paraffin sections were deparaffinized, heated in
citrate buffer (0.01 M, pH=6.0) for 10 min using a microwave oven, and then incubated in
3% hydrogen peroxide. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies
against ED-1 (1:25, Serotec, Oxford, UK ) or cleaved caspase-3 (rabbit anti-rat) (1:3,000,
Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). Antibody binding was detected using an
EnVision Detection Kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Positively stained cells were quantified
by counting cells in ten randomly selected high-power fields (magnification, ×400) per
section in a blinded manner.
Western blot
Kidney p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression was detected using a
Western blot assay. The primary antibody was rabbit polyclonal anti-ratp38 or
phosphorylated-p38. The secondary antibody was peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit
antibody. Proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence technology and analyzed with the
Image J software.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 software (IBM
corp., Armonk, NY, USA). All values were reported as means ± SE of the mean (SEM) values.
In group comparisons, one-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey post hoc test and
nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used. P-values less than 0.05 were considered
statistically significant.
Results
Effect of carnosol on renal IRI-induced renal damage
To evaluate the effect of carnosol on IRI-induced renal damage, we examined BUN and Scr
levels, the major markers of renal function, in all three groups. Our data showed that
renal IRI significantly elevated both BUN and Scr levels of rats
(P<0.05). A single dose of carnosol markedly attenuated renal function
of rats, which was reflected by the substantial reduction of BUN and Scr levels, compared
with those of the IRI group (P<0.05, Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on renal function. (A) Serum creatinine levels.
(B) Blood urea nitrogen levels. Bars represent means ± SE; N=10 rats per group. *
P<0.05 vs. the sham group; ** P<0.01 vs.
the sham group; # P<0.05 vs. the IRI group.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on renal function. (A) Serum creatinine levels.
(B) Blood ureanitrogen levels. Bars represent means ± SE; N=10 rats per group. *
P<0.05 vs. the sham group; ** P<0.01 vs.
the sham group; # P<0.05 vs. the IRI group.The results of histologic examination further confirmed the attenuation of renal damage
by carnosol. H&E-stained sections of rat kidneys from the sham group had a normal
tubular appearance, whereas those from the IRI group showed changes indicative of severe
tubular cell necrosis, including tubular cell dilation, medullary hemorrhage, and tubular
destruction. On the other hand, sections of rat kidneys from the carnosol group displayed
less extensive areas of tubular cell necrosis (Fig.
3A). The appearance of tubular cells was also improved by carnosol pretreatment. The
results of semiquantitative histologic evaluation showed that carnosol markedly reduced
the tubular injury score, from 6.4 ± 0.6 to 4.7 ± 0.4 (P<0.05, Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on renal damage. (A) Photos of H&E staining
of kidney tissue sections from the sham group, IRI group, and Car group
(magnification: ×400). Sections from the sham group had a normal tubular appearance,
whereas sections from the IRI group showed severe tubular epithelial cell necrosis.
Pretreatment with carnosol significantly improved the above histologic changes. (B)
The results of semiquantitative histopathological evaluation confirmed that carnosol
significantly reduced the tubular injury score. Bars represent means ± SE; N=10 rats
per group. ** P<0.01 vs. the sham group; ##
P<0.01 vs. the IRI group.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on renal damage. (A) Photos of H&E staining
of kidney tissue sections from the sham group, IRI group, and Car group
(magnification: ×400). Sections from the sham group had a normal tubular appearance,
whereas sections from the IRI group showed severe tubular epithelial cell necrosis.
Pretreatment with carnosol significantly improved the above histologic changes. (B)
The results of semiquantitative histopathological evaluation confirmed that carnosol
significantly reduced the tubular injury score. Bars represent means ± SE; N=10 rats
per group. ** P<0.01 vs. the sham group; ##
P<0.01 vs. the IRI group.
Effect of carnosol on renal IRI-induced inflammatory cell infiltration in
kidneys
To evaluate the effect of carnosol on renal IRI-induced inflammation, we examined the
level of renal MPO, a major marker of inflammatory cell infiltration. Our data
demonstrated that renal IRI induced a substantial increase in the renal MPO level from 1.2
± 0.2 U/g to 6.1 ± 0.7 U/g compared with that in the sham group
(P<0.01). Carnosol pretreatment significantly attenuated the renal MPO
level to 3.8 ± 0.5 U/g compared with that in the IRI group (P<0.05,
Fig. 4A).
Fig. 4.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on renal inflammation. (A) Renal MPO levels.
(B) TNF-α levels and (C) IL-1β levels in kidney tissues were examined by ELISA
assay. (D) Photos of immunohistochemical staining of ED-1 in rats from the sham
group, IRI group, and Car group (magnification: ×400). Bars represent means ± SE;
N=10 rats per group. ** P<0.01 vs. the sham group; #
P<0.05 vs. the IRI group.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on renal inflammation. (A) Renal MPO levels.
(B) TNF-α levels and (C) IL-1β levels in kidney tissues were examined by ELISA
assay. (D) Photos of immunohistochemical staining of ED-1 in rats from the sham
group, IRI group, and Car group (magnification: ×400). Bars represent means ± SE;
N=10 rats per group. ** P<0.01 vs. the sham group; #
P<0.05 vs. the IRI group.We then examined renal monocyte/macrophage infiltration using ED-1 (a specific
monocyte/macrophage marker) immunostaining. As shown in Fig. 4D, the number of cells positively stained for ED-1 was markedly increased
in the kidneys of rats in the IRI group, whereas carnosol pretreatment significantly
reduced the number of cells positively stained for ED-1.
Effect of carnosol on renal IRI-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in the
kidneys
We examined the renal expression of TNF-α and IL-1β, which have been considered the most
prominent pro-inflammatory cytokines, using ELISA. Our data showed that renal IRI caused
markedly higher expression of both TNF-α and IL-1β in kidney tissues compared with the
levels in the sham group (P<0.01). On the other hand, carnosol
pretreatment significantly attenuated the increase in TNF-α and IL-1β expression in kidney
tissues compared with the levels in the IRI group (P<0.05, Figs. 4B and C).
Effect of carnosol on renal IRI-induced tubular apoptosis
To evaluate the effect of carnosol on renal IRI-induced tubular apoptosis, we performed a
TUNEL assay. Our data showed that the kidneys of rats in the IRI group exhibited a
significant increase in the number of TUNEL-positive cells compared with those of rats in
the sham group (P<0.01). On the other hand, few TUNEL-positive tubular
cells were found in the kidneys of rats pretreated with carnosol
(P<0.01, Figs. 5A and C).
Fig. 5.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on apoptotic renal tubular death. (A) Photos of
TUNEL staining of kidney tissue sections from rats in the sham group, IRI group, and
Car group (magnification: ×400). (B) Photos of immunohistochemical staining of
cleaved caspase-3 in rats from the sham group, IRI group, and Car group
(magnification: ×400). (C) The quantitative evaluation of apoptotic tubular cells.
(D) The quantitative evaluation of cleaved caspase-3 positive cells. Bars represent
means ± SE; N=10 rats per group. * P<0.05 vs. the sham group; **
P<0.01 vs. the sham group; # P<0.05 vs.
the IRI group; ## P<0.01 vs. the IRI group.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on apoptotic renal tubular death. (A) Photos of
TUNEL staining of kidney tissue sections from rats in the sham group, IRI group, and
Car group (magnification: ×400). (B) Photos of immunohistochemical staining of
cleaved caspase-3 in rats from the sham group, IRI group, and Car group
(magnification: ×400). (C) The quantitative evaluation of apoptotic tubular cells.
(D) The quantitative evaluation of cleaved caspase-3 positive cells. Bars represent
means ± SE; N=10 rats per group. * P<0.05 vs. the sham group; **
P<0.01 vs. the sham group; # P<0.05 vs.
the IRI group; ## P<0.01 vs. the IRI group.Caspase-3 has been reported to be cleaved and activated during apoptosis [29]. To confirm the role of carnosol in inhibiting
apoptosis during renal IRI, we examined renal cleaved caspase-3 expression with an
immunohistochemical assay. As shown in Fig. 5B,
the number of cells stained positively for cleaved caspase-3 was markedly increased in the
kidneys of rats in the IRI group, whereas carnosol pretreatment significantly reduced the
number of cells stained positively for cleaved caspase-3 (P<0.05,
Fig. 5D).
Effect of carnosol on renal IRI-induced p38 MAPK activation
As shown in Fig. 6, the expression of renal phosphorylated p38 MAPK, which is the active form of p38
MAPK, significantly increased in rats in the IRI group compared with that in rats in the
sham group (P<0.05). On the other hand, carnosol pretreatment markedly
reduced phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression in kidney tissues
(P<0.05).
Fig. 6.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on p38 MAPK activation. (A) Immunoblots of
phosphorylated p38 (p-p38) MAPK in kidney tissues. (B) Immunoblots of total p38
(t-p38) MAPK in kidney tissues. (C) Immunoblots of β-actin. (D) Densitometric data
of p-p38 MAPK (relative to t-p38 MAPK). Bars represent means ± SE; N=10 rats per
group. * P<0.05 vs. the sham group; # P<0.05
vs. the IRI group.
The effect of carnosol pretreatment on p38 MAPK activation. (A) Immunoblots of
phosphorylated p38 (p-p38) MAPK in kidney tissues. (B) Immunoblots of total p38
(t-p38) MAPK in kidney tissues. (C) Immunoblots of β-actin. (D) Densitometric data
of p-p38 MAPK (relative to t-p38 MAPK). Bars represent means ± SE; N=10 rats per
group. * P<0.05 vs. the sham group; # P<0.05
vs. the IRI group.
Discussion
Carnosol is a phenolic diterpene extracted from several natural sources, including
rosemary. Previous studies have shown that carnosol possesses anticancer activity, and could
be used as a therapeutic agent in patients with various cancers including prostate, colon,
and breast cancer [10, 11, 24]. In addition, carnosol
possesses anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic action and significantly reduces free radical
formation in the mammalian body [18, 25, 31, 33]. Recently, a report has demonstrated that carnosol
improved hepatic damage induced by intestinal IRI by reducing inflammatory mediators and
free radicals [30]. Tian et al.
[27] also reported that carnosol markedly
attenuated intestinal IRI-induced lung injury by inhibiting inflammatory responses in lung
tissues. In this study, we examined the potential effect of carnosol on renal IRI. Our data
demonstrated that pretreatment with a single dose of carnosol significantly improved
IRI-induced renal tubular damage, which was reflected by improved renal function and
histologic features. Previous studies have shown that renal IRI is responsible for the high
morbidity and mortality of patients with AKI in both urology and nephrology departments
[15, 28].
Based on the fact that no effective therapeutic agent has been available for patients with
AKI until recently, we believe that the results of this study are promising, as a single
dose of carnosol pretreatment protected kidneys from renal IRI, by significantly suppressing
renal inflammation and tubular apoptotic death.Inflammation, which is considered an important factor in the initiation and maintenance of
IRI, is usually characterized by several processes, such as inflammatory cell infiltration,
inflammatory cytokine activation, and adhesion molecule overexpression [13, 23]. In
addition, inflammation has been reported to influence apoptosis through diverse signaling
pathways during IRI [5, 13]. Therefore, the inhibition of inflammation is considered an effective
intervention to improve renal IRI. Previous studies have demonstrated that carnosol
significantly reduced inflammatory responses in vitro and in
vivo [21, 27, 30]. Consistent with the results of
those studies, our data showed that carnosol pretreatment markedly reduced renal MPO, which
is widely used as a marker of inflammatory cell infiltration. Moreover, carnosol
significantly reduced the number of ED-1-positive cells in kidney tissues, which were mainly
macrophages and monocytes. Inflammatory cell infiltration plays a crucial role in the
development of inflammation by producing cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and proteases.
TNF-α and IL-1β are known as the most important pro-inflammatory cytokines, which may cause
tissue damage directly and lead to the overexpression of other inflammatory mediators [5, 26]. Our data
showed that the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β in kidney tissues was also reduced by
carnosol. Reports have shown that depletion of inflammatory cell infiltration improved
IRI-induced renal damage [12, 26]. Therefore, the inhibition of inflammatory cell infiltration may be
partly linked to the anti-inflammatory action of carnosol during renal IRI.Previous studies have reported that carnosol significantly suppressed cell apoptosis [14, 33]. Our data
showed that carnosol markedly reduced the expression of renal TNF-α, which has been
demonstrated to play a key role in the initiation of apoptosis [5, 6]. Therefore, we investigated
the effect of carnosol on tubular apoptotic death during renal IRI. In our study, we
observed severe tubular cell apoptosis, which was reflected by the widespread distribution
of TUNEL-positive cells, in the kidneys of rats in the IRI group 24 h after reperfusion. In
contrast, carnosol pretreatment significantly reduced the number of TUNEL-positive cells in
the kidneys. Apoptosis is a crucial factor in the whole process of reperfusion. Reports have
shown that apoptosis is one of the most important mechanisms of renal IRI [4, 6]. Therefore,
the renoprotective action of carnosol may be partly related to its inhibition of tubular
apoptotic death. To further investigate the mechanism of the anti-apoptotic effect of
carnosol, we examined caspase-3 activation in kidney tissues using a special antibody which
could detect the activated caspase-3, i.e., the cleaved caspase-3. Caspase-3 is usually
activated during IRI and contributes to the whole process of apoptosis induced by IRI [29]. Alternatively, inhibition of caspase-3 activation
significantly attenuates cell apoptosis [2, 13]. Our data showed that the kidneys of rats in the IRI
group exhibited significantly higher expression of cleaved caspase-3, whereas carnosol
pretreatment markedly attenuated the increase. This result is consistent with a previous
study reporting that carnosol treatment markedly reduced caspase-3 activation in neuronal
cells [14].The p38 MAPK signaling pathway has been reported to play an important role in the
initiation and maintenance of IRI. Since the p38 MAPK pathway contributes to both
inflammation and apoptosis, it is obvious that p38 MAPK activation aggravates renal IRI
[5, 6, 19]. On the other hand, downregulation of activated p38
MAPK (the phosphorylated p38) leads to the attenuation of renal IRI [7]. Previous studies have demonstrated that carnosol inhibited p38 MAPK
activation in mousemelanoma cells and macrophages [9,
18]. Consistent with these results, our data showed
that renal IRI caused a significant increase in the phosphorylated p38 in kidney tissues,
whereas carnosol pretreatment markedly attenuated the increase. This result may be related
to the anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effect of carnosol, although the precise
mechanisms need further investigations.In summary, our data demonstrated that a single dose of carnosol before renal ischemia
significantly attenuated renal damage by improving inflammatory cell infiltration, apoptotic
tubular cell death, and p38 MAPK activation in kidney tissues. Although the precise
mechanisms and dose limit of carnosol need to be determined in future research, carnosol may
be worth developing as a potential therapeutic agent for patients with AKI.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Authors: M A Daemen; C van 't Veer; G Denecker; V H Heemskerk; T G Wolfs; M Clauss; P Vandenabeele; W A Buurman Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Daniel Poeckel; Christine Greiner; Moritz Verhoff; Oliver Rau; Lars Tausch; Christina Hörnig; Dieter Steinhilber; Manfred Schubert-Zsilavecz; Oliver Werz Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Michele Andreucci; Teresa Faga; Antonio Pisani; Massimo Sabbatini; Ashour Michael Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Vafa Baradaran Rahimi; Mohammad Amin Momeni-Moghaddam; Maria Giovanna Chini; Anella Saviano; Francesco Maione; Giuseppe Bifulco; Pouria Rahmanian-Devin; Ali Jebalbarezy; Vahid Reza Askari Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Samia Adel Abd El-Baset; Manal R Abd El-Haleem; Rehab S Abdul-Maksoud; Asmaa A A Kattaia Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 4.379