Literature DB >> 30068600

Preferences in a trait decision determined by transcription factor variants.

Michael W Dorrity1,2, Josh T Cuperus1,3, Jolie A Carlisle1, Stanley Fields4,3,5, Christine Queitsch4.   

Abstract

Few mechanisms are known that explain how transcription factors can adjust phenotypic outputs to accommodate differing environments. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the decision to mate or invade relies on environmental cues that converge on a shared transcription factor, Ste12. Specificity toward invasion occurs via Ste12 binding cooperatively with the cofactor Tec1. Here, we determine the range of phenotypic outputs (mating vs. invasion) of thousands of DNA-binding domain variants in Ste12 to understand how preference for invasion may arise. We find that single amino acid changes in the DNA-binding domain can shift the preference of yeast toward either mating or invasion. These mutations define two distinct regions of this domain, suggesting alternative modes of DNA binding for each trait. We characterize the DNA-binding specificity of wild-type Ste12 to identify a strong preference for spacing and orientation of both homodimeric and heterodimeric sites. Ste12 mutants that promote hyperinvasion in a Tec1-independent manner fail to bind cooperative sites with Tec1 and bind to unusual dimeric Ste12 sites composed of one near-perfect and one highly degenerate site. We propose a model in which Ste12 alone may have evolved to activate invasion genes, which could explain how preference for invasion arose in the many fungal pathogens that lack Tec1.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolutionary trade-off; fungal invasion; fungal mating; transcription factor; yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30068600      PMCID: PMC6112720          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805882115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  52 in total

1.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server.

Authors:  L J McGuffin; K Bryson; D T Jones
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Program-specific distribution of a transcription factor dependent on partner transcription factor and MAPK signaling.

Authors:  Julia Zeitlinger; Itamar Simon; Christopher T Harbison; Nancy M Hannett; Thomas L Volkert; Gerald R Fink; Richard A Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Fungal mating pheromones: choreographing the dating game.

Authors:  Stephen K Jones; Richard J Bennett
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  HSP90 Shapes the Consequences of Human Genetic Variation.

Authors:  Georgios I Karras; Song Yi; Nidhi Sahni; Máté Fischer; Jenny Xie; Marc Vidal; Alan D D'Andrea; Luke Whitesell; Susan Lindquist
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Combinatorial control required for the specificity of yeast MAPK signaling.

Authors:  H D Madhani; G R Fink
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Multiplexed massively parallel SELEX for characterization of human transcription factor binding specificities.

Authors:  Arttu Jolma; Teemu Kivioja; Jarkko Toivonen; Lu Cheng; Gonghong Wei; Martin Enge; Mikko Taipale; Juan M Vaquerizas; Jian Yan; Mikko J Sillanpää; Martin Bonke; Kimmo Palin; Shaheynoor Talukder; Timothy R Hughes; Nicholas M Luscombe; Esko Ukkonen; Jussi Taipale
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Modularity of MAP kinases allows deformation of their signalling pathways.

Authors:  Areez Mody; Joan Weiner; Sharad Ramanathan
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Inhibitory and activating functions for MAPK Kss1 in the S. cerevisiae filamentous-growth signalling pathway.

Authors:  J G Cook; L Bardwell; J Thorner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights.

Authors:  Raluca Gordân; Kevin F Murphy; Rachel P McCord; Cong Zhu; Anastasia Vedenko; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Conformational control of the Ste5 scaffold protein insulates against MAP kinase misactivation.

Authors:  Jesse G Zalatan; Scott M Coyle; Saravanan Rajan; Sachdev S Sidhu; Wendell A Lim
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The Boggarts of biology: how non-genetic changes influence the genotype.

Authors:  Laasya Samhita
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 2.  Functional assays for transcription mechanisms in high-throughput.

Authors:  Chenxi Qiu; Craig D Kaplan
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Binding and Regulation of Transcription by Yeast Ste12 Variants To Drive Mating and Invasion Phenotypes.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Michael W Dorrity; Kerry L Bubb; Christine Queitsch; Stanley Fields
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  GroEL/S Overexpression Helps to Purge Deleterious Mutations and Reduce Genetic Diversity during Adaptive Protein Evolution.

Authors:  Bharat Ravi Iyengar; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 8.800

5.  MaveDB: an open-source platform to distribute and interpret data from multiplexed assays of variant effect.

Authors:  Daniel Esposito; Jochen Weile; Jay Shendure; Lea M Starita; Anthony T Papenfuss; Frederick P Roth; Douglas M Fowler; Alan F Rubin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 13.583

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.