Literature DB >> 30068542

Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds.

James J Waggitt1, Pierre W Cazenave2, Leigh M Howarth3, Peter G H Evans3,4, Jeroen van der Kooij5, Jan G Hiddink3.   

Abstract

Understanding links between habitat characteristics and foraging efficiency helps predict how environmental changes influence populations of top predators. This study examines whether measurements of prey (clupeids) availability varied over stratification gradients, and determined if any of those measurements coincided with aggregations of foraging seabirds (common guillemot Uria aalge and Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus) in the Celtic Sea, UK. The probability of encountering foraging seabirds was highest around fronts between mixed and stratified water. Prey were denser and shallower in mixed water, whilst encounters with prey were most frequent in stratified water. Therefore, no single measurement of increased prey availability coincided with the location of fronts. However, when considered in combination, overall prey availability was highest in these areas. These results show that top predators may select foraging habitats by trading-off several measurements of prey availability. By showing that top predators select areas where prey switch between behaviours, these results also identify a mechanism that could explain the wider importance of edge habitats for these taxa. As offshore developments (e.g. marine renewable energy installations) change patterns of stratification, their construction may have consequences on the foraging efficiency of seabirds.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  edge habitats; foraging efficiency; fronts; marine renewable energy installations; stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30068542      PMCID: PMC6127128          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  2 in total

1.  Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds.

Authors:  James J Waggitt; Pierre W Cazenave; Leigh M Howarth; Peter G H Evans; Jeroen van der Kooij; Jan G Hiddink
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Prey patch patterns predict habitat use by top marine predators with diverse foraging strategies.

Authors:  Kelly J Benoit-Bird; Brian C Battaile; Scott A Heppell; Brian Hoover; David Irons; Nathan Jones; Kathy J Kuletz; Chad A Nordstrom; Rosana Paredes; Robert M Suryan; Chad M Waluk; Andrew W Trites
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Combined measurements of prey availability explain habitat selection in foraging seabirds.

Authors:  James J Waggitt; Pierre W Cazenave; Leigh M Howarth; Peter G H Evans; Jeroen van der Kooij; Jan G Hiddink
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Oceanic thermal structure mediates dive sequences in a foraging seabird.

Authors:  Xavier Meyer; Andrew J J MacIntosh; Andre Chiaradia; Akiko Kato; Francisco Ramírez; Cédric Sueur; Yan Ropert-Coudert
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Environmental heterogeneity decreases reproductive success via effects on foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Alice M Trevail; Jonathan A Green; Jonathan Sharples; Jeff A Polton; Peter I Miller; Francis Daunt; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Kendrew Colhoun; Stephen Newton; Gail Robertson; Samantha C Patrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Localised anthropogenic wake generates a predictable foraging hotspot for top predators.

Authors:  Lilian Lieber; W Alex M Nimmo-Smith; James J Waggitt; Louise Kregting
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-04-04

5.  Drivers of concentrated predation in an Antarctic marginal-ice-zone food web.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saenz; David G Ainley; Kendra L Daly; Grant Ballard; Erin Conlisk; Megan L Elrod; Stacy L Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Ecological costs of climate change on marine predator-prey population distributions by 2050.

Authors:  Dinara Sadykova; Beth E Scott; Michela De Dominicis; Sarah L Wakelin; Judith Wolf; Alexander Sadykov
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  A bird's-eye view on turbulence: seabird foraging associations with evolving surface flow features.

Authors:  Lilian Lieber; Roland Langrock; W Alex M Nimmo-Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Consistent concentrations of critically endangered Balearic shearwaters in UK waters revealed by at-sea surveys.

Authors:  Jessica Ann Phillips; Alex N Banks; Mark Bolton; Tom Brereton; Pierre Cazenave; Natasha Gillies; Oliver Padget; Jeroen van der Kooij; James Waggitt; Tim Guilford
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.