Literature DB >> 30067169

Epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in agricultural areas.

Milton N Schroth1, John J Cho1, Sylvia K Green1, Spyros D Kominos2.   

Abstract

A prevailing opinion is that the strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa that infects both plants and humans are two separate species. This study strongly disputes that notion until the modern molecular technology proves otherwise. This paper examines a spectrum of strains occurring in nature, their habitats, dissemination, their relationship to clinical strains, and the environmental conditions that favor their colonization of plants. The isolates were obtained from clinical specimens, plants, soil, and water. The identity of these strains was confirmed using pyocin typing and biochemical assays. The data reveal that agricultural soils, potted ornamental plants, hoses, fountains, and faucets frequently harbored P. aeruginosa. However, it was not commonly found in semi-arid areas, suggesting that moisture and high humidity is necessary for colonization and survival. Though found in soil, P. aeruginosa was seldom isolated on edible plant parts. The pathogenicity of various strains on plants was tested by inoculating vegetables, lettuce slices (Lactuca sativa L. "Great Lakes"), celery stalks (Apium graveolens L. var. Dulce], potato tuber slices (Solanum tuberosum L. "Whiterose"), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. Mill), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), rutabaga (Brassica campestris L.), and carrot (Daucus carota L. var sativa). There was considerable variation in the strains' ability to cause rot, but no difference was observed between clinical isolates and others from agricultural fields, water, and soil. Two of the clinical isolates from burn patients, P. aeruginosa PA13 and PA14, exhibited the greatest virulence in causing rot in all the plants that were tested, especially on cucumber, lettuce, potato, and tomato. The study discusses how closely the epidemiology of P. aeruginosa relates to many plant pathogens, and the ability of human isolates to colonize plants and food material under favorable conditions. The biochemical and phenotypic similarity among strains from the clinical and agricultural material is strongly indicative that they are the same species and that plants and soil are natural reservoirs for P. aeruginosa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PA13; PA14; Pseudomonas reservoirs; burn isolates; clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates; ornamental plants; plant model; pyocin typing; virulence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30067169     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  13 in total

1.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Detection Using Conventional PCR and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Based on Species-Specific Novel Gene Targets Identified by Pangenome Analysis.

Authors:  Chufang Wang; Qinghua Ye; Aiming Jiang; Jumei Zhang; Yuting Shang; Fan Li; Baoqing Zhou; Xinran Xiang; Qihui Gu; Rui Pang; Yu Ding; Shi Wu; Moutong Chen; Qingping Wu; Juan Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  What Makes Pseudomonas aeruginosa a Pathogen?

Authors:  Burkhard Tümmler
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Extracellular DNA Promotes Efficient Extracellular Electron Transfer by Pyocyanin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.

Authors:  Scott H Saunders; Edmund C M Tse; Matthew D Yates; Fernanda Jiménez Otero; Scott A Trammell; Eric D A Stemp; Jacqueline K Barton; Leonard M Tender; Dianne K Newman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Impairment in inflammasome signaling by the chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients results in an increase in inflammatory response.

Authors:  Melissa S Phuong; Rafael E Hernandez; Daniel J Wolter; Lucas R Hoffman; Subash Sad
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 8.469

5.  Novel Immune Modulators Enhance Caenorhabditis elegans Resistance to Multiple Pathogens.

Authors:  Nicholas A Hummell; Alexey V Revtovich; Natalia V Kirienko
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.389

6.  Phenotypic and Genomic Comparison of the Two Most Common ExoU-Positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clones, PA14 and ST235.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; Sarah Dethlefsen; Jens Klockgether; Burkhard Tümmler
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.496

7.  Direct RNA Nanopore Sequencing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clone C Transcriptomes.

Authors:  Marie-Madlen Pust; Colin Francis Davenport; Lutz Wiehlmann; Burkhard Tümmler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Competitive Fitness of Essential Gene Knockdowns Reveals a Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Inhibitor of the Cell Division Protein FtsZ.

Authors:  Andrew M Hogan; Viola C Scoffone; Vadim Makarov; April S Gislason; Haben Tesfu; Maria S Stietz; Ann Karen C Brassinga; Michael Domaratzki; Xuan Li; Alberto Azzalin; Marco Biggiogera; Olga Riabova; Natalia Monakhova; Laurent R Chiarelli; Giovanna Riccardi; Silvia Buroni; Silvia T Cardona
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  The Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lipopolysaccharide in Bacterial Pathogenesis and Physiology.

Authors:  Steven M Huszczynski; Joseph S Lam; Cezar M Khursigara
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2019-12-19

10.  Why? - Successful Pseudomonas aeruginosa clones with a focus on clone C.

Authors:  Changhan Lee; Jens Klockgether; Sebastian Fischer; Janja Trcek; Burkhard Tümmler; Ute Römling
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 16.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.