Literature DB >> 30065571

Effect of Retrograde Cerebral Protection Strategy on Outcome of Patients with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.

Ming-Yuan Kang1, Shih-Rong Hsieh1, Hung-Wen Tsai1, Hao-Ji Wei1, Chung-Chi Wang1, Chu-Leng Yu1, Chung-Lin Tsai1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neurological complications are an important concern in the repair of type A aortic dissection. Supra-aortic involvement is considered to be an important risk factor for neurological injuries. However, the optimal brain protection strategy still remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and short-term results of retrograde cerebral protection techniques in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection.
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2013, 185 patients who underwent repair of acute type A aortic dissection were enrolled in this study, all of whom received retrograde cerebral perfusion. The patients were divided into two group: 102 patients who had at least one carotid artery involved as the carotid dissection group, and 83 patients who had no carotid artery involvement as the non-carotid dissection group.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 57.8 years and 69% were male. The 30-day mortality rate was 10.3%, and the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 11.9%. Eight patients (4.3%) developed new permanent neurological deficits (PNDs) including two in the non-carotid dissection group and six in the carotid dissection group. Although new PND was milder in the carotid dissection group, there was no significant difference (p = 0.248). The proportion of patients who received a coronary artery bypass graft was significantly higher in the carotid dissection group (1 vs. 8, p = 0.037).
CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, the retrograde cerebral perfusion technique is an easy and safe procedure, especially for patients with concomitant carotid dissection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral perfusion; Type A aortic dissection

Year:  2018        PMID: 30065571      PMCID: PMC6066949          DOI: 10.6515/ACS.201807_34(4).20180301B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin        ISSN: 1011-6842            Impact factor:   2.672


  17 in total

1.  Contemporary results following surgical repair of acute type a aortic dissection (AAAD): a single centre experience.

Authors:  Andrew J M Campbell-Lloyd; Julie Mundy; Nigel Pinto; Annabelle Wood; Elaine Beller; Stephen Strahan; Pallav Shah
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.975

2.  Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Presenting as ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Referred for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Jian-Liung Wang; Chun-Chi Chen; Chao-Yung Wang Wang; Ming-Jer Hsieh; Shang-Hung Chang; Cheng-Hung Lee; Dong-Yi Chen; I-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  Pearls & Oy-sters: a stroke of luck: detecting type A aortic dissection by MRA.

Authors:  Megan H Hyland; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Cerebral protection during surgery for acute aortic dissection type A: results of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA).

Authors:  Tobias Krüger; Ernst Weigang; Isabell Hoffmann; Maria Blettner; Hermann Aebert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Comparative study of brain protection in ascending aorta replacement for acute type A aortic dissection: retrograde cerebral perfusion versus selective antegrade cerebral perfusion.

Authors:  Tadahisa Sugiura; Kiyotaka Imoto; Keiji Uchida; Tomoyuki Minami; Shota Yasuda
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-08-18

6.  The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease.

Authors:  P G Hagan; C A Nienaber; E M Isselbacher; D Bruckman; D J Karavite; P L Russman; A Evangelista; R Fattori; T Suzuki; J K Oh; A G Moore; J F Malouf; L A Pape; C Gaca; U Sechtem; S Lenferink; H J Deutsch; H Diedrichs; J Marcos y Robles; A Llovet; D Gilon; S K Das; W F Armstrong; G M Deeb; K A Eagle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Patients with type A acute aortic dissection presenting with major brain injury: should we operate on them?

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Himanshu J Patel; Christoph A Nienaber; Daniel M Montgomery; Amit Korach; Thoralf M Sundt; Carlo Devincentiis; Matthias Voehringer; Mark D Peterson; Truls Myrmel; Gianluca Folesani; Magnus Larsen; Nimesh D Desai; Joseph E Bavaria; Jehangir J Appoo; Teresa M Kieser; Rossella Fattori; Kim Eagle; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Santi Trimarchi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Acute type A aortic dissection: 18 years of experience in one center (Hospital 12 de Octubre).

Authors:  Alberto Forteza; Carlos Martín; Jorge Centeno; María Jesús López; Enrique Pérez; Javier de Diego; Violeta Sánchez; José Cortina
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-06-05

9.  Evaluation of risk factors for transient neurological dysfunction and adverse outcome after repair of acute type A aortic dissection in 122 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Peter L Haldenwang; Thorsten Wahlers; Anja Himmels; Jens Wippermann; Mohamed Zeriouh; Axel Kröner; Kathrin Kuhr; Justus T Strauch
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Antegrade cerebral perfusion for acute type A aortic dissection in 120 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Farhad Bakhtiary; Selami Dogan; Andreas Zierer; Omer Dzemali; Feyzan Oezaslan; Panagiotis Therapidis; Faisal Detho; Thomas Wittlinger; Sven Martens; Peter Kleine; Anton Moritz; Tayfun Aybek
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  4 in total

1.  Early and late outcomes of non-total aortic arch replacement for repair of acute Stanford Type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Zhifa Zheng; Lingbo Yang; Zhongjie Zhang; Dong Wang; Junqing Zong; Likui Zhang; Xuening Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  From Real-World Evidence to Consensus of Renal Denervation in Taiwan: A Call for the Incorporation of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring after Witnessed Intake of Medications.

Authors:  Tzung-Dau Wang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  Dissection of Arch Branches Alone: An Indication for Aggressive Arch Management in Type A Dissection?

Authors:  Elizabeth L Norton; Xiaoting Wu; Linda Farhat; Karen M Kim; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb; Bo Yang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Endovascular Aortic Arch Reconstruction with Parallel Grafts: A Dilemma of Excessive Endograft Oversizing.

Authors:  Huey-Shiuan Kuo; Kun-Cheng Tsai; Jer-Shen Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.672

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.