Literature DB >> 23410778

Patients with type A acute aortic dissection presenting with major brain injury: should we operate on them?

Marco Di Eusanio1, Himanshu J Patel, Christoph A Nienaber, Daniel M Montgomery, Amit Korach, Thoralf M Sundt, Carlo Devincentiis, Matthias Voehringer, Mark D Peterson, Truls Myrmel, Gianluca Folesani, Magnus Larsen, Nimesh D Desai, Joseph E Bavaria, Jehangir J Appoo, Teresa M Kieser, Rossella Fattori, Kim Eagle, Roberto Di Bartolomeo, Santi Trimarchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The management strategy remains controversial for patients presenting with type A acute aortic dissection with cerebrovascular accident or coma. The present study aimed to help guide surgeons treating these high-risk patients.
METHODS: Of 1873 patients with type A acute aortic dissection enrolled in the International Registry for Acute Dissection, 87 (4.7%) presented with cerebrovascular accident and 54 (2.9%) with coma. The hospital and 5-year results were stratified by the presence and type of brain injury (no injury vs stroke vs coma) and management type (medical vs surgical). Independent predictors of short- and mid-term survival were identified.
RESULTS: Presentation with shock, hypotension, or tamponade (46.8% vs 25.2%; P < .001) and arch vessel involvement (55.0% vs 36.1%; P < .001) was more likely in patients with brain injury. Surgical management was avoided more often in patients with coma (33.3%) or cerebrovascular accident (24.1%) than in those without brain injury (11.1%; P < .001). The overall hospital mortality was 22.7% without brain injury, 40.2% with cerebrovascular accident, and 63.0% with coma (P < .001). Mortality varied among the management types for both cerebrovascular accident (76.2% medical vs 27.0% surgical; P < .001) and coma (100% medical vs 44.4% surgical; P < .001). Postoperatively, cerebrovascular accident and coma resolved in 84.3% and 78.8% of cases, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, surgery was protective against mortality in patients presenting with brain injury (odds ratio 0.058; P < .001). The 5-year survival of patients presenting with cerebrovascular accident and coma was 23.8% and 0% after medical management versus 67.1% and 57.1% after surgery (log rank, P < .001), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Brain injury at presentation adversely affects hospital survival of patients with type A acute aortic dissection. In the present observational study, the patients selected to undergo surgery demonstrated improved late survival and frequent reversal of neurologic deficits.
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23410778     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  16 in total

1.  eComment. Rationale for operating on the elderly with acute type A dissection.

Authors:  Jamil Hajj-Chahine
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 2.  Cerebral perfusion issues in type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Davide Pacini; Giacomo Murana; Luca Di Marco; Marianna Berardi; Carlo Mariani; Giuditta Coppola; Mariafrancesca Fiorentino; Alessandro Leone; Roberto Di Bartolomeo
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-04-24

Review 3.  Surgery for thoracic aortic disease in Japan: evolving strategies toward the growing enemies.

Authors:  Yutaka Okita
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-07

4.  Direct perfusion of the carotid artery in patients with brain malperfusion secondary to acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Yutaka Okita; Yuki Ikeno; Koki Yokawa; Yojiro Koda; Soichiro Henmi; Yasuko Gotake; Hidekazu Nakai; Takashi Matsueda; Takeshi Inoue; Hiroshi Tanaka
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-12-28

Review 5.  Malperfusion syndromes in type A aortic dissection: what we have learned from IRAD.

Authors:  Paolo Berretta; Santi Trimarchi; Himanshu J Patel; Thomas G Gleason; Kim A Eagle; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-31

6.  Painless Acute Aortic Dissection May Present as a Stroke; Risky Markers that Could be Identified on Hospital Arrival.

Authors:  Ying Chieh Huang; Sheng Feng Sung; Kuan Ting Liu
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 7.  Malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection: how we handle the challenge?

Authors:  Paneer Selvam Krishna Moorthy; Abdul Samad Sakijan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-01-28

8.  IRAD experience on surgical type A acute dissection patients: results and predictors of mortality.

Authors:  Paolo Berretta; Himanshu J Patel; Thomas G Gleason; Thoralf M Sundt; Truls Myrmel; Nimesh Desai; Amit Korach; Antonello Panza; Joe Bavaria; Ali Khoynezhad; Elise Woznicki; Dan Montgomery; Eric M Isselbacher; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Rossella Fattori; Christoph A Nienaber; Kim A Eagle; Santi Trimarchi; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07

9.  Effect of Retrograde Cerebral Protection Strategy on Outcome of Patients with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Ming-Yuan Kang; Shih-Rong Hsieh; Hung-Wen Tsai; Hao-Ji Wei; Chung-Chi Wang; Chu-Leng Yu; Chung-Lin Tsai
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.672

10.  Initial experience with the new type A arch dissection stent: restoration of supra-aortic vessel perfusion.

Authors:  Matteo Montagner; Markus Kofler; Roland Heck; Semih Buz; Christoph Starck; Stephan Kurz; Volkmar Falk; Jörg Kempfert
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.