| Literature DB >> 30065480 |
Sibel Caglar Okur1, Yasemin Pekin Dogan1, Murat Mert2, Ozge Aksu1, Ozer Burnaz1, Nil Sayiner Caglar1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of musculoskeletal complications in diabetes mellitus (DM) increases with the duration of disease and with poor glycemic control. Our aim was to evaluate lower extremity musculoskeletal complications in patients with DM using the Glasgow Ultrasound Enthesitis Scoring System, and to reveal the relationship between clinical and sono-graphic findings.Entities:
Keywords: Glasgow Ultrasound Enthesitis Scoring System; diabetes mellitus; enthesitis; lower limb; ultrasound
Year: 2017 PMID: 30065480 PMCID: PMC6029304 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmu.2017.03.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ultrasound ISSN: 0929-6441
Glasgow Ultrasound Enthesitis Scoring System.
| Superior pole of the patella—quadriceps tendon enthesis |
| Quadriceps tendon thickness >6.1 mm |
| Suprapatellar bursitis |
| Superior pole of patella erosion |
| Superior pole of patella enthesophyte |
| Inferior pole of the patella—proximal patellar ligament enthesis |
| Patellar ligament thickness >4mm |
| Inferior pole of patella erosion |
| Inferior pole of patella enthesophyte |
| Tibial tuberosity—distal patellar ligament enthesis |
| Patellar ligament thickness >4mm |
| Infrapatellar bursitis |
| Tibial tuberosity erosion |
| Tibial tuberosity enthesophyte |
| Superior pole of the calcaneus—Achilles tendon enthesis |
| Achilles tendon thickness >5.29 mm |
| Retrocalcaneal bursitis |
| Posterior pole of calcaneus erosion |
| Posterior pole of calcaneus enthesophyte |
| Inferior pole of the calcaneus—plantar aponeurosis enthesis |
| Plantar aponeurosis thickness >4.4 mm |
| Inferior pole of calcaneus erosion |
| Inferior pole of calcaneus enthesophyte |
Each item scores 1 point. The total possible score for both lower extremities is 36.
Figure 1Inferior pole of the patella–proximal patellar ligament enthesis: enthesophyte at the inferior pole of the patella and thickening of the patellar tendon.
Figure 4Tibial tuberosity–distal patellar ligament enthesis: enthesophyte at the attaching point of patellar tendon to tuberositas tibia thickening of the patellar tendon. TBS = tuberositas.
Patient characteristics.
| Duration of diabetes (y) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3–5 | 5–10 | 10–20 | >20 | ||
| No. of patients | 14 | 23 | 15 | 14 | |
| Sex (female/male) | 9/5 | 15/8 | 8/7 | 9/5 | >0.001 |
| Age (min/max) | 55 (38–67) | 63 (48–82) | 64 (56–72) | 71 (66–77) | <0.001 |
ANOVA = analysis of variance; max = maximum; min = minimum.
aANOVA test.
Sonographic findings at entheseal sites by duration of diabetes mellitus.
| Duration of diabetes(y) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3–5 | 5–10 | 10–20 | >20 | ||
| Total GUESS score | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 3.7 ± 2.1 | 5.3 ± 2.3 | 10.1 ± 1.2 | 12.2 ±2 | |
| Min–Max | 1–8 | 1–8 | 8–12 | 9–16 | |
| Total enthesophyte score | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 2 ±1.2 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | |
| Min–Max | 1–3 | 0–5 | 2–5 | 4–5 | |
| Total erosion score | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.6± 0.8 | 1.4±1.7 | 2.1 ±1.3 | 3.3±1.1 | |
| Min–Max | 0–2 | 0–4 | 0–4 | 1–5 | |
| Quadriceps tendon thickness (mm) | >0.001 | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 5.6 ±0.3 | 5.9 ±0.4 | 5.6 ± 0.7 | 5.4 ± 0.4 | |
| Min–Max | 5.3–6.3 | 4.6–6.3 | 4.7 ± 6.3 | 5.0 ± 5.8 | |
| Proximal patellar tendon thickness (mm) | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 3.7 ±0.5 | 4.0± 0.2 | 4.0± 0.2 | 4.2 ±0.3 | |
| Min–Max | 2.3–4.2 | 3.7–4.5 | 3.6–4.3 | 3.7–4.6 | |
| Distal patellar ligament thickness (mm) | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 4 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | |
| Min–Max | 3.6–4.3 | 3.2–4.9 | 3.6–4.4 | 3.7–4.5 | |
| Achilles tendon thickness (mm) | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean ±SD | 4.9 ±0.5 | 4.1 ±0.3 | 4.7±0.5 | 5.1±0.7 | |
| Min–Max | 3.8–5.6 | 3.6–4.7 | 3.8–5.4 | 4–6.1 | |
| Plantar fascia thickness (mm) | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 4.1± 0.3 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 4.4±0.4 | 4.4 ±0.5 | |
| Min–Max | 3.7–4.8 | 3.5–4.7 | 3.6–4.9 | 3.7–5.9 | |
| Glycosylated hemoglobin | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 6.4 ± 0.8 | 6.9 ± 0.6 | 7.4 ± 1.1 | |
| Min–Max | 5.1–6.6 | 5.1–7.8 | 6.1–7.9 | 5.9–9.2 | |
ANOVA= analysis of variance; GUESS = Glasgow Ultrasound Enthesitis Enthesitis Scoring System; max = maximum min = minimum; SD= standard deviation.
aANOVA test
Comparison of GUESS scores between groups by Tukey’s test.
| Groups | Mean diff. | Q | p | 95% CI of diff. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups 1 & 2 | −4.18 | 3.62 | <0.01>** | −5.73 to –2.3 |
| Groups 1 & 3 | −3.31 | 2.91 | <0.01** | −4.71 to –1.8 |
| Groups 1 & 4 | −5.27 | 4.31 | <0.001*** | −6.34 to –2.5 |
| Groups 2 & 3 | −1.21 | 0.95 | <0.01** | −4.34 to –0.85 |
| Groups 2 & 4 | −3.91 | 2.87 | <0.01** | −5.51 to –0.87 |
| Groups 3 & 4 | −1.23 | 0.91 | <0.01** | −2.87 to –0.15 |
** p < 0.01, moderately significant.
*** p < 0.001, highly significant.
CI = confidence interval; diff. = difference; GUESS =Glasgow Ultrasound Enthesitis Scoring System.