| Literature DB >> 21138564 |
Michele Abate1, Cosima Schiavone, Vincenzo Salini.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of rotator cuff tears increases with age and several studies have shown that diabetes is associated with symptomatic shoulder pathologies. Aim of our research was to evaluate the prevalence of shoulder lesions in a population of asymptomatic elderly subjects, normal and with non insulin - dependent diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21138564 PMCID: PMC3019220 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Demography and associated diseases
| Controls | Diabetics | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70.7 ± 4.5 (65 - 82) | 71.5 ± 4.8 (65 - 84) | ns | |
| 20 : 12 | 30 : 18 | ns | |
| - Heavy work | 10 (31.25%) | 12 (25%) | Ns |
| - Light work | 22 (68.75%) | 36 (75%) | ns |
| 10 (31.2%) | 29 (60.4%) | ||
| 6 (18.7%) | 18 (37.5%) | ||
| 5 (15.6%) | 12 (25%) | ns | |
Figure 1Ultrasound appearance of normal and degenerated Supraspinatus Tendon. Panel a) Transverse scan: a normal fibrillar pattern and thickness of Supraspinatus Tendon is observed (between calipers). Panel b) Supraspinatus Tendon is thickened (calipers), hypoechoic, dishomogeneous, with loss of the normal fibrillar pattern. In this picture, an effusion in the subacromial bursa is present (*). 1) Supraspinatus tendon; 2) Biceps tendon; H) Humeral head; D) Deltoid muscle.
Sonographic findings in diabetics and control subjects
| DOMINANT SIDE | NON DOMINANT SIDE | BOTH SHOULDERS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Diabetics | p | Controls | Diabetics | p | Controls | Diabetics | p | |
| Thickness (mm) | 5.2 ± 0.7 | 6.2 ± 0.9 | 4.7 ± 0.6 | 5.6 ± 0.6 | 0.08 | ||||
| Minor lesions | 1 (3.1%) | 10 (20.8%) | 1 (3.1%) | 5 (10.4%) | 0.22 | 2 (3.1%) | 15 (15.8%) | ||
| Major lesions | 3 (9.3%) | 10 (20.8%) | 0.17 | 2 (6.2%) | 5 (10.4%) | 0.5 | 5 (7.8%) | 15 (15.8%) | 0.14 |
| Thickness (mm) | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 4 ± 0.8 | 3 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | |||||
| Minor lesions | 1 (3.1%) | 2 (4.1%) | 0.06 | 1 (3.1%) | 1 (2%) | 0.09 | 2 (3.1%) | 3 (3.1%) | 0.00 |
| Major lesions | 1 (3.1%) | 3 (6.2%) | 0.39 | 1 (3.1%) | 2 (4.1%) | 0.06 | 2 (3.1%) | 5 (5.1%) | 0.37 |
| Rotator cuff | 7 (21.8%) | 22 (45.8%) | 6 (18.7%) | 19 (39.5%) | 13 (20.3%) | 41 (42.7%) | |||
| BT | 3 (9.3%) | 17 (35.4%) | 2 (6.2%) | 9 (28.1%) | 0.11 | 5 (7.8%) | 26 (27.8%) | ||
| SAD | 4 (12.5%) | 16 (33.3%) | 3 (9.3%) | 7 (14.5%) | 7 (10.9%) | 23 (23.9%) | |||
| BT | 5 (15.6%) | 21 (43.7%) | 2 (6.2%) | 11 (22.9%) | 7 (10.9%) | 32 (33.3%) | |||
Figure 2Supraspinatus Tendon tears. Panel a) Longitudinal scan: an intratendinous partial thickness tear is reported as focal hypoechoic discontinuity (calipers) with irregular margins. Panel b) Transverse scan: a full defect in the tendon from the bursal to the articular margin, filled with anechoic fluid, is observed (calipers). 1) Supraspinatus tendon; H) Humeral head; D) Deltoid muscle.
Figure 3Tenosynovitis of the Biceps tendon. Panel a) Biceps tendon into the bicipital groove (transverse scan): the fibrillar pattern and thickness are normal. Panel b) Fluid around the tendon (*) expands the synovial sheet (arrows) expression of tenosynovitis. A mild thickening of Biceps tendon is observed. 1) Biceps tendon; BG) Bicipital groove; D) Deltoid muscle.