Literature DB >> 30064319

Deep brain stimulation of the cerebellum for poststroke motor rehabilitation: from laboratory to clinical trial.

Connor A Wathen1, Leonardo A Frizon2, Tanmoy K Maiti3, Kenneth B Baker4, Andre G Machado3.   

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with profound economic costs. Poststroke motor impairment is the most commonly encountered deficit resulting in significant disability and is the primary driver of stroke-associated healthcare expenditures. Although many patients derive some degree of benefit from physical rehabilitation, a significant proportion continue to suffer from persistent motor impairment. Noninvasive brain stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation, epidural cortical stimulation, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) have all been studied as potential modalities to improve upon the benefits derived from physical therapy alone. These neuromodulatory therapies aim primarily to augment neuroplasticity and drive functional reorganization of the surviving perilesional cortex. The authors have proposed a novel and emerging therapeutic approach based on cerebellar DBS targeted at the dentate nucleus. Their rationale is based on the extensive reciprocal connectivity between the dentate nucleus and wide swaths of cerebral cortex via the dentatothalamocortical and corticopontocerebellar tracts, as well as the known limitations to motor rehabilitation imposed by crossed cerebellar diaschisis. Preclinical studies in rodent models of ischemic stroke have shown that cerebellar DBS promotes functional recovery in a frequency-dependent manner, with the most substantial benefits of the therapy noted at 30-Hz stimulation. The improvements in motor function are paralleled by increased expression of markers of synaptic plasticity, synaptogenesis, and neurogenesis in the perilesional cortex. Given the findings of preclinical studies, a first-in-human trial, Electrical Stimulation of the Dentate Nucleus Area (EDEN) for Improvement of Upper Extremity Hemiparesis Due to Ischemic Stroke: A Safety and Feasibility Study, commenced in 2016. Although the existing preclinical evidence is promising, the results of this Phase I trial and subsequent clinical trials will be necessary to determine the future applicability of this therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCD = crossed cerebellar diaschisis; CPC = cerebropontocerebellar; DBS = deep brain stimulation; DN = dentate nucleus; DTC = dentatothalamocortical; ECS = epidural cortical stimulation; EDEN = Electrical Stimulation of the Dentate Nucleus Area; LCN = lateral cerebellar nucleus; LTP = long-term potentiation; MEP = motor evoked potential; NIBS = noninvasive brain stimulation; NMDA = N-methyl-d-aspartate; VNS = vagal nerve stimulation; cerebellum; deep brain stimulation; rehabilitation; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30064319     DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.FOCUS18164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  13 in total

1.  Excitation, but not inhibition, of the fastigial nucleus provides powerful control over temporal lobe seizures.

Authors:  Martha L Streng; Esther Krook-Magnuson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Luana Billeri; Antonino Naro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Time and Brain Region-Dependent Excitatory Neurochemical Alterations in Bilateral Common Carotid Artery Occlusion Global Ischemia Model.

Authors:  Olubukola Benedicta Ojo; Zainab Abiola Amoo; Mary Tolulope Olaleye; Sushil Kumar Jha; Afolabi Clement Akinmoladun
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.414

4.  Cortico-cerebellar connectivity underlying motor control in chronic post-stroke individuals.

Authors:  R Gopalakrishnan; D A Cunningham; O Hogue; M Schroedel; B A Campbell; E B Plow; K B Baker; A G Machado
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Charlotte Rosso; Eric Jr Moulton; Claire Kemlin; Sara Leder; Jean-Christophe Corvol; Sophien Mehdi; Mickael A Obadia; Mickael Obadia; Marion Yger; Elena Meseguer; Vincent Perlbarg; Romain Valabregue; Serena Magno; Pavel Lindberg; Sabine Meunier; Jean-Charles Lamy
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.088

6.  Cerebellar Neuromodulation for Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica Cooperrider; Arbaz Momin; Kenneth B Baker; Andre G Machado
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-02-20

Review 7.  The cerebellum and epilepsy.

Authors:  Martha L Streng; Esther Krook-Magnuson
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 8.  Rewiring the Lesioned Brain: Electrical Stimulation for Post-Stroke Motor Restoration.

Authors:  Shi-Chun Bao; Ahsan Khan; Rong Song; Raymond Kai-Yu Tong
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.967

9.  Entrainment of Network Activity by Closed-Loop Microstimulation in Healthy Ambulatory Rats.

Authors:  Alberto Averna; Page Hayley; Maxwell D Murphy; Federico Barban; Jimmy Nguyen; Stefano Buccelli; Randolph J Nudo; Michela Chiappalone; David J Guggenmos
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.861

10.  Electrical stimulation of the lateral cerebellar nucleus promotes neurogenesis in rats after motor cortical ischemia.

Authors:  Zheng Wu; Fangling Sun; Zijie Li; Min Liu; Xin Tian; Deyu Guo; Penghu Wei; Yongzhi Shan; Tingting Liu; Min Guo; Zixin Zhu; Wenrong Zheng; Yufeng Wang; Guoguang Zhao; Wen Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.