Literature DB >> 30063191

Radiomic Machine Learning for Characterization of Prostate Lesions with MRI: Comparison to ADC Values.

David Bonekamp1, Simon Kohl1, Manuel Wiesenfarth1, Patrick Schelb1, Jan Philipp Radtke1, Michael Götz1, Philipp Kickingereder1, Kaneschka Yaqubi1, Bertram Hitthaler1, Nils Gählert1, Tristan Anselm Kuder1, Fenja Deister1, Martin Freitag1, Markus Hohenfellner1, Boris A Hadaschik1, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer1, Klaus H Maier-Hein1.   

Abstract

Purpose To compare biparametric contrast-free radiomic machine learning (RML), mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and radiologist assessment for characterization of prostate lesions detected during prospective MRI interpretation. Materials and Methods This single-institution study included 316 men (mean age ± standard deviation, 64.0 years ± 7.8) with an indication for MRI-transrectal US fusion biopsy between May 2015 and September 2016 (training cohort, 183 patients; test cohort, 133 patients). Lesions identified by prospective clinical readings were manually segmented for mean ADC and radiomics analysis. Global and zone-specific random forest RML and mean ADC models for classification of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason grade group ≥ 2) were developed on the training set and the fixed models tested on an independent test set. Clinical readings, mean ADC, and radiomics were compared by using the McNemar test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results In the test set, radiologist interpretation had a per-lesion sensitivity of 88% (53 of 60) and specificity of 50% (79 of 159). Quantitative measurement of the mean ADC (cut-off 732 mm2/sec) significantly reduced false-positive (FP) lesions from 80 to 60 (specificity 62% [99 of 159]) and false-negative (FN) lesions from seven to six (sensitivity 90% [54 of 60]) (P = .048). Radiologist interpretation had a per-patient sensitivity of 89% (40 of 45) and specificity of 43% (38 of 88). Quantitative measurement of the mean ADC reduced the number of patients with FP lesions from 50 to 43 (specificity 51% [45 of 88]) and the number of patients with FN lesions from five to three (sensitivity 93% [42 of 45]) (P = .496). Comparison of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the mean ADC (AUCglobal = 0.84; AUCzone-specific ≤ 0.87) vs the RML (AUCglobal = 0.88, P = .176; AUCzone-specific ≤ 0.89, P ≥ .493) showed no significantly different performance. Conclusion Quantitative measurement of the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) improved differentiation of benign versus malignant prostate lesions, compared with clinical assessment. Radiomic machine learning had comparable but not better performance than mean ADC assessment. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30063191     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018173064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  46 in total

1.  Use of radiomics based on 18F-FDG PET/CT and machine learning methods to aid clinical decision-making in the classification of solitary pulmonary lesions: an innovative approach.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Xue-Lei Ma; Ting Zhang; Jian Wang; Tao Zhang; Rong Tian
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Donghyun Kim; Ho Sung Kim; Seo Young Park; Jung Youn Kim; Se Jin Cho; Jae Ho Shin; Jeong Hoon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Machine learning and multiparametric MRI for early diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  D Bonekamp; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Quantitative MRI or Machine Learning for Prostate MRI: Which Should You Use?

Authors:  Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Simon Hein; Gerd Reis; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  A radiomics machine learning-based redefining score robustly identifies clinically significant prostate cancer in equivocal PI-RADS score 3 lesions.

Authors:  Ying Hou; Mei-Ling Bao; Chen-Jiang Wu; Jing Zhang; Yu-Dong Zhang; Hai-Bin Shi
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-01

7.  Implementation and design of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Hailey H Choi; Silvia D Chang; Marc D Kohli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

Review 8.  [Artificial intelligence and radiomics in MRI-based prostate diagnostics].

Authors:  Charlie Alexander Hamm; Nick Lasse Beetz; Lynn Jeanette Savic; Tobias Penzkofer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Radiomics prediction model for the improved diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI.

Authors:  Mengjuan Li; Tong Chen; Wenlu Zhao; Chaogang Wei; Xiaobo Li; Shaofeng Duan; Libiao Ji; Zhihua Lu; Junkang Shen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-02

10.  Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Gianluca Giannarini; Caroline M Moore; Anwar R Padhani; Valeria Panebianco; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Georg Salomon; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.