| Literature DB >> 30060611 |
Xiaoyong Chen1,2,3, Jing Zhang4, Ruokun Yi5, Jianfei Mu6, Xin Zhao7,8, Zhennai Yang9.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of heat-killed and live Lactobacillus on carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄)-induced acute liver injury mice. The indexes evaluated included liver pathological changes, the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), and malondialdehyde (MDA) in the serum, related gene expression (IL-1β, TNF-α, Bcl-2, and Bax), and related proteins levels (Bax, Bcl-2, Caspase 3, and NF-κB p65). Compared with the model group, the results indicated that the levels of ALT, AST, and MDA in the serum, the expression levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, and Bax, and the protein levels of Bax, Caspase 3, and NF-κB p65 significantly decreased, and the pathologic damage degree all significantly reduced after live Lactobacillus fermentum (L-LF) and live Lactobacillus plantarum (L-LP) treatment. Additionally, the levels of SOD and GSH in the serum, the gene expression of Bcl-2, and the protein level of Bcl-2 significantly increased after L-LF and L-LP treatment. Although HK-LF and HK-LP could also have obvious regulating effects on some of the evaluated indexes (ALT, AST, the expression levels of TNF-α and Bax, and the protein level of Bcl-2) and play an important role in weakening liver damage, the regulating effects of L-LF or L-LP on these indexes were all better compared with the corresponding heat-killed Lactobacillus fermentum (HK-LF) and heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum (HK-LP). Therefore, these results suggested that LF and LP have an important role in liver disease.Entities:
Keywords: CCl4; Lactobacillus fermentum; Lactobacillus plantarum; hepatoprotective effect
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30060611 PMCID: PMC6121558 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Morphology of strains. (A) Colony morphology; (B) Cell morphology.
Figure 216S rDNA sequence analysis. (A) Detection of PCR product using agarose gel electrophoresis; (B) Species analysis using a phylogenetic tree of 16S rDNA sequence.
Figure 3Effects of stimulated gastric juice and bile salt on strains.
Figure 4Histopathology observation of liver.
Figure 5The levels of liver enzymes in serum. ## p < 0.01 compared with the normal group, ** p < 0.01 compared with the model group, and ▲▲ p < 0.01.
Figure 6The levels of antioxidant indexes in serum. ## p < 0.01 compared with the normal group, ** p < 0.01 compared with the model group, ▲ p < 0.05 and ▲▲ p < 0.01.
Figure 7Related gene expression levels in liver injury. ## p < 0.01 compared with the normal group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with the model group, ▲ p < 0.05 and ▲▲ p < 0.01.
Figure 8Related protein levels in liver injury. ## p < 0.01 compared with the normal group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with the model group, ▲ p < 0.05 and ▲▲ p < 0.01.