Literature DB >> 30059751

Do genetic polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor contribute to breast/ovarian cancer? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Jiaqi Li1, Bo Li2, Qiyu Jiang3, Yingshi Zhang2, Aixia Liu2, Huan Wang2, Juling Zhang2, Qin Qin4, Zhixian Hong5, Bo-An Li6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To identify the most suitable genetic model for detecting the risk of breast cancer (BC)/ovarian cancer (OC) in specific populations.
METHODS: Databases were searched for related studies published up to October 2017. First, VDR genetic polymorphisms were compared in patients with and without cancer. Second, a network meta-analysis was used to reveal the relation between VDR genetic polymorphisms with disease outcomes. Subgroup analyses and a meta-regression were performed according to cancer types, ethnicity and genotypic method. The study is registered in PROSPERO with an ID: CRD42017075505.
RESULTS: Forty-five studies were eligible, which included 65,754 patients and 55 clinical analyses. Of genetic models, results suggested that the recessive model with the CDX2 polymorphism predicted the risk of BC in all cases. The recessive polymorphism model with the rs2228570 (FokI) polymorphism seemed to the best predictor of BC in Caucasian patients, whereas the homozygote model with the CDX2 polymorphism appeared to best predict BC in African-American patients. The homozygote model with the rs2228570 (FokI) polymorphism model appeared to detect the risk of OC in all cases, whereas the heterozygote model with the rs1544410 (BsmI) polymorphism seemed to detect the risk of OC in Caucasian patients.
CONCLUSIONS: By detecting the risk of BC, the recessive model with the rs2228570 (FokI) polymorphism is likely the best genetic model in Caucasian patients, and the homozygote model with the CDX2 polymorphism appears to be best genetic model in African-American patients. Moreover, for detecting clinical risk of OC, heterozygote models with the rs1544410 (BsmI) polymorphism is likely the best genetic model for detecting the risk of OC in Caucasian patients.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Network meta-analysis; Ovarian cancer; Polymorphisms; Vitamin D receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30059751     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.07.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  8 in total

1.  Sun Exposure Is Associated with Reduced Breast Cancer Risk among Women Living in the Caribbean: The Atabey Study in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Cruz M Nazario; Rosa V Rosario-Rosado; Michelle Schelske-Santos; Imar Mansilla-Rivera; Farah A Ramírez-Marrero; Jing Nie; Paola Piovanetti-Fiol; Johan Hernández-Santiago; Jo L Freudenheim
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.090

Review 2.  Vitamin D in Triple-Negative and BRCA1-Deficient Breast Cancer-Implications for Pathogenesis and Therapy.

Authors:  Janusz Blasiak; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Jan Chojnacki; Joanna Szczepanska; Michal Fila; Cezary Chojnacki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  MicroRNA-645 targets urokinase plasminogen activator and decreases the invasive growth of MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Du Meng; Ming Lei; Yaxuan Han; Dongli Zhao; Xiaozhi Zhang; Yunyi Yang; Rui Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Vitamin D and Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature with a Focus on Molecular Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andraž Dovnik; Nina Fokter Dovnik
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  The role of bile acids in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Tadeja Režen; Damjana Rozman; Tünde Kovács; Patrik Kovács; Adrienn Sipos; Péter Bai; Edit Mikó
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 9.207

Review 6.  Vitamin D, Th17 Lymphocytes, and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Beata Filip-Psurska; Honorata Zachary; Aleksandra Strzykalska; Joanna Wietrzyk
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 7.  Vitamin D and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis in Iranian patients.

Authors:  Tayebeh Oghabi Bakhshaiesh; Elahe Nazeri; Narges Jafarbeik-Iravani; Zainab Shirvani-Farsani; Rezvan Esmaeili
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-11

8.  Vitamin D intake, blood vitamin D levels, and the risk of breast cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Dingli Song; Yujiao Deng; Kang Liu; Linghui Zhou; Na Li; Yi Zheng; Qian Hao; Si Yang; Ying Wu; Zhen Zhai; Hongtao Li; Zhijun Dai
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 5.682

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.